Preoperative needle core biopsy useful in palpable breast masses highly suspicious for malignancy;Preoperatieve naaldbiopsie: Een aanwinst bij palpabele mammatumoren met sterke aanwijzingen voor maligniteit

Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde

Volumn 140, Issue 39, 1996, Pages 1952-1956

  Zonderland, H M ^a   Van De Velde, C J H ^a   Van De Vijver, M J ^a   Hermans, J ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CLINICAL TRIAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; NEEDLE BIOPSY; ULTRASOUND;

BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COHORT STUDIES; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 0029769268     PISSN: 00282162     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Hermansen C, Skovgaard Poulsen H, Jensen J, Langfeldt B, Steenskov V, Frederiksen P, et al. Diagnostic reliability of combined physical examination, mammography, and fine needle puncture ('triple test') in breast tumors. A prospective study. Cancer 1987;60:1866-71.
2. Langmuir VK, Cramer SF, Hood ME. Fine needle aspiration cytology in the management of palpable benign and malignant breast disease Correlation with clinical and mammographic findings. Acta Cytol 1989;33:93-8.
3. Kaufman Z, Shpitz B, Shapiro M, Rona R, Lew S, Dinbar A. Triple approach in the diagnosis of dominant breast masses: combined physical examination, mammography, and fine-needle aspiration. J Surg Oncol 1994;56:254-7
4. Kaplan SS, Racenstein MJ, Wong WS, Hansen GC, McCombs MM, Bassett LW. US-guided core biopsy of the breast with a coaxial system. Radiology 1995;194:573-5.
5. Schütte HE Herziening consensus beeldvormende diagnostiek van de mamma. Utrecht: Centraal Begeleidingsorgaan voor de Intercollegiate Toetsing, 1993.
6. Layfield LJ, Glasgow BJ, Cramer H. Fine-needle aspiration in the management of breast masses. Pathol Annu 1989;24:23-62.
7. Parker SH, Lovin JD, Jobe WE, Luethke JM, Hopper KD, Yakes WF, et al. Stereotactic breast biopsy with a biopsy gun. Radiology 1990;176 741-7
8. McMahon AJ, Lutty AM, Matthew A, Walls ADF, McOrmick JS, Henderson MA, et al. Needle core biopsy of the breast with a spring-loaded device. Br J Surg 1992,79:1042-5.
9. Parker SH, Jobe WE, Dennis MA, Stavros AT, Johnson KK, Yakes WF, et al. US-guided automated large-core breast biopsy Radiology 1993;187:507-11.
10. Fornage BD, Coan JD, David CL Ultrasound-guided needle biopsy of the breast and other interventional procedures. Radiol Clin North Am 1992;30.167-85.
11. Harter LP, Curtis JS, Ponto GP, Graig PH. Malignant seeding of the needle track during stereotaxic core needle breast biopsy. Radiology 1992;185:713-4.
12. Berg WA. When is core breast biopsy or fine-needle aspiration not enough? Radiology 1996;198:313-5.
13. Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Rosen PP, Abramson AF, Deutch BM, Hann LE. Stereotaxic 14-gauge breast biopsy: how many core biopsy specimens are needed? Radiology 1994;192 793-5.
14. Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Rosen PP, Giess CS, Cohen MA, Abramson AF, et al. Stereotaxic core biopsy of breast carcinoma: accuracy at predicting invasion. Radiology 1995;194:379-81.