Monitoring and analysis of outcome studies

International Anesthesiology Clinics

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 263-277

  Lagasse, Robert S ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ANESTHESIA; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE; LIFE EXPECTANCY; META ANALYSIS; MONITORING; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0029764875     PISSN: 00205907     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004311-199603430-00014     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Duncan PG, Cohen MM. Pulse oximetry and capnography in anaesthetic practice: an epidemiological appraisal. Can J Anaesth 1991;38:619-625
2. Orkin FK, Cohen MM, Duncan PG. The quest for meaningful outcomes (editorial). Anesthesiology 1993;78:417-422
3. Orkin FK. Patient monitoring during anesthesia as an exercise in technology assessment. In: Saidman LJ, ed. Monitoring in anesthesia, 3rd ed. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1993:439-455
4. Byrick RJ, Cohen MM. Technology assessment of anaesthesia monitors: problems and future directions. Can J Anaesth 1995;42:234-239
5. Feinstein AR. An additional basic science for clinical medicine: II. The limitations of randomized trials. Ann Intern Med 1983;99:544
6. Pearson KS, Moyers JR. To monitor or not to monitor: the cost. In: Day LK, ed. Anesthesiology clinics of North America. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1994:323-344
7. Vitez TS. Principles of cost analysis. J Clin Anesth 1994;6:357-363
8. Gabel R. Evolution of Joint Commission Anesthesia Clinical Indicators. American Society of Anesthesiologists Newsletter 1994;58:24-28
9. Nadzam DM, Turpin R, Hanold LS, White RE. Data-driven performance improvement in health care: the Joint Commission's indicator measurement system. J Qual Improv 1993;19:492-500
10. Cooper JB, Cullen DJ, Nemeskal R, et al. Effects of information feedback and pulse oximetry on the incidence of anesthesia complications. Anesthesiology 1987;67:686-694
11. Eichhorn JH. Effect of monitoring standards on anesthesia outcome. Int Anesthesiol Clin 1993;31:181-196
12. Gore JH, Goldberg RJ, Spodick DH, et al. A community-wide assessment of the use of pulmonary artery catheters in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Chest 1987;92:721-727
13. Keats AS. Anesthesia mortality in perspective. Anesth Anal 1990;71:113-119
14. Moller JT, Johannessen NW, Espersen K, et al. Randomized evaluation of pulse oximetry in 20,802 patients: II. Perioperative events and postoperative complications. Anesthesiology 1993;78:445-453
15. Eichhorn JH. Pulse oximetry as a standard of practice in anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1993;78:423-426
16. Moller JT, Pedersen T, Rasmussen LS, et al. Randomized evaluation of pulse oximetry in 20,802 patients: I. Design, demography, pulse oximetry failure rate, and overall complication rate. Anesthesiology 1993;78:436-444
17. Tiret L, Desmonts JM, Hatton F, Vourc'h G. Complications associated with anaesthesia - a prospective survey in France. Can Anaesth Soc J 1986;33:336-344
18. Keenan RL, Boyan CP. Cardiac arrests due to anesthesia: a study of the incidence and causes. JAMA 1985;253:2373-2377
19. Eichhorn JH. Prevention of intraoperative anesthesia accidents and related severe injury through safety monitoring. Anesthesiology 1989;70:572-577
20. Laupacis A, Sacken DL, Roberts RS, An assessment of clinically useful measures of the consequences of treatment. N Engl J Med 1989;318:1728-1733
21. Cohen DE, Downes JJ, Raphaely RC. What difference does pulse oximetry make? Anesthesiology 1988;68:181-183
22. Lagasse RS, Steinberg ES, Katz RI, Saubermann AJ. Defining quality of perioperative care by statistical process control of adverse outcomes. Anesthesiology 1995;82:1181-1188
23. O'Neil AC, Petersen LA, Cook EF, et al. Physician reporting compared with medical-record review to identify adverse medical events. Ann Intern Med 1993;119:370-376
24. Cullen DJ, Bates DW, Small SD, et al. The incident reporting system does not detect adverse drug events: a problem for quality improvement. J Qual Improv 1995;21:541-548
25. Tinker JH, Dull DL, Caplan RA, et al. Role of monitoring devices in prevention of anesthetic mishaps: a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology 1989;71:541-546
26. Goldman R. The reliability of peer assessments of quality of care. JAMA 1992;267:958-960
27. Pierce ECJ. The development of anesthesia guidelines and standards. Qual Rev Bull 1990;16:61-64
28. Gravenstein JS, deVeris A, Beneken JE. Sampling interval for clinical monitoring of variables during anesthesia. J Clin Monit 1989;5:17-21
29. Block FE. Normal fluctuation of physiologic cardiovascular parameters and the phenomenon "smoothing." J Clin Monit 1991;7:141-145
30. Gardner RM, Prakash O. Challenges and opportunities for computerizing the anesthesia record. J Clin Anesth 1994;6:333-341
31. Edsall DW, Jones BR, Smith NT. The anesthesia database, the automated record, and the quality assurance process. Int Anesthesiol Clin 1992;30:71-92
32. Block FE. The anesthesia database: knowledge is power. Anesthesiol Clin North Am 1994;12:371-381
33. Hasselblad V, McCrory DC. Meta-analytic tools for medical decision making: a practical guide. Med Decis Making 1995;15:81-96
34. Deming WE. Out of the crisis. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute for Technology, Center for Advanced Engineering, 1986:309-370
35. Arens JF. A practice parameters overview. Anesthesiology 1993;78:229-230
36. Maklan CW, Greene R, Cummings MA. Methodological challenges and innovations in patient outcomes research. Med Care 1994;32:JS13-JS21
37. Roizen MF. Practice guidelines for pulmonary artery catheterization: a report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Pulmonary Artery catheterization. Anesthesiology 1993;78:380-394