Comparisons of long-term effects of lisinopril vs nifedipine vs conventional therapy in the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Chinese Medical Journal (Taipei)

Volumn 57, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 392-400

  Lin, Mike ^a   Yang, Yung Fu ^b   Lee, Derek ^b   Chiang, Hung Ting ^b  

^a CHANG GUNG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^b KAOHSIUNG VETERANS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; conventional therapy; hypertension; renin angiotensin system

Indexed keywords

AMILORIDE; AMILORIDE PLUS HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE; ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENT; ATENOLOL; BETA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; DIURETIC AGENT; HYDRALAZINE; HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE; ISOSORBIDE DINITRATE; LISINOPRIL; NIFEDIPINE; VASODILATOR AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE LUNG DISEASE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG EFFICACY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; ORAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RENIN ANGIOTENSIN ALDOSTERONE SYSTEM; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; ANGIOTENSIN-CONVERTING ENZYME INHIBITORS; CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION; LISINOPRIL; LUNG DISEASES, OBSTRUCTIVE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NIFEDIPINE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 0029764126     PISSN: 05781337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Moterson BJ, Reda DJ, Gushman WC, Massie BM, Freis ED, Kochar MS, Hamburger RJ, Fye CF, Lakshman R, Gottdiener J, Ramirez EA, Henderson WG. Single-drug therapy for hypertension in men: a comparison of six antihypertensive agents with placebo. N Engl J Med 1993;328:914-21.
2. Lin M, Chiang HT, Chen CY. Comparisons of long-term effects between converting enzyme inhibitors and conventional therapy in treating mild to moderate hypertesion. Chin Med J (Taipei) 1991;48:339-50.
3. Lin M, Chiang HT, Yang YF, Lin SL, Chen CY, Kong CW, Wang SP, Chang MS. Long-term beneficial effects of converting enzyme inhibitors in patients with moderate hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy. Acta Cardiol Sin 1993;9:254-63.
4. Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group on Antihypertensive Agents. Comparison of propranolol and hydrochlorothiazide for the initial treatment of hypertension. I. Results of short-term titration with emphasis on racial differences in response. JAMA 1982;248:1996-2003.
5. Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group on Antihypertensive Agents. Comparison of propranolol and hydrochlorothiazide for the initial treatment of hypertension. II. Results of long-term therapy. JAMA 1982;248:2004-11.
6. Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group on Antihypertensive Agents. Low-dose captopril for the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension. Hypertension 1985;5(suppl III):139-44.
7. Materson BJ, Cushman WC, Goldstein G, Pool JL. Treatment of hypertension in the elderly. I. Blood pressure and clinical changes: results of a Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study. Hypertension 1990;15:348-60.
8. Lin M, Chiang HT, Chen CY, Chiang BN. Comparison of enalapril and conventional vasodilator therapy in patients with chronic congestive heart failure. J Formosan Med Assoc 1991;90:452-9.
9. Dickstein K, Aarsland T, Woie L. Acute hemodynamic and hormonal effects of lisinopril (MK 521) in congestive heart failure. Am Heart J 1986;112:121-9.
10. Dickstein K, Aarasland T, Tjelta K, Cirillo VJ, Gomez HJ. A comparison of hypotensive responses after oral and intravenous administration of enalapril and lisinopril in chronic heart failure. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1987;9:705-10.
11. The National High Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinating Committee. The Fifth report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC V). Arch Int Med 1993;153:154-83.
12. Elliott WJ. Controversies regarding the recommendations of the Fifth Report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Compr Ther 1994;20:181-5.
13. Alderman MH. A review of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. The Fifth Report, 1993. Am J Hypertens 1993;6:896-8.
14. Task Force on the Availability of Cardiovascular Drugs to the Medically Indigent. Report of the Task Force on the Availability of Cardiovascular Drugs to the Medically Indigent. Circulation 1992;85:850-60.
15. Martin TR. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In: Cummins RO, ed. Blue Blook of Medical Diagnosis. Philadelphia; WB Saunders, 1986;18:145-50.
16. Marshall HJ, Beevers DG. Lisinopril in the treatment of uncomplicated essential hypertension. Rev Contemp Pharmacother 1993;4:81-6.
17. Pool JL, Gennari J, Goldstein R. Controlled multicenter study of the antihypertensive effects of lisinopril, hydrochlorothiazide and lisinopril plus hydrochlorothiazide in the treatment of 394 patients with mild to moderate hypertension. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1987;9(suppl 3):36-42.
18. Messerli FH, Kaesser UR. Lisinopril in the treatment of hypertension. J Human Hypertens 1989;3:17-21.
19. Cappucio FP, Markandu ND, Singer DRJ, MacOregor GA. ACE inhibitors and calcium antagonists combined with sodium restriction in essential hypertension. Am J Hypertens 1990;3:112-8A.
20. Cappucio FP, Markandu ND, Singer DRJ, Macgregor GA. Amlodipine and lisinopril in combination of moderate to severe hypertension. J Hypertens 1992;10(suppl 4):S147-52.
21. Dahlof B, Pennert K, Hansson L. Reversal of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients. A meta-analysis of 109 treatment studies. Am J Hypertens 1992;5:95-110.
22. Morlin C, Baglivo H, Boeijinga JK. Comparative trial of lisinopril and nifedipine in mild to severe essential hypertension. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1987;9(suppl 3):S48-52.
23. Richardson PJ, Meany B, Bredkenridge AM, Grimmer SFM, Johnston G, Kondowe G. Lisinopril in essential hypertension: a six month comparative study with nifedipine. J Human Hypertens 1987;1:175-9.
24. Ds I, Bratland B, Dahlof B, Gisholt K, Syvertsen JO, Tretli S. Lisinopril or nifedipine in essential hypertension? A Norwegian multicenter study on efficacy, tolerability and quality of life in 828 patients. J Hypertens 1991;9:1097-104.