Appropriateness of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: Are there geographic differences? [1]

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 97-98

  Eckardt, V F ^a   Kanzler, G ^a   Minoli, G ^a   Prado, A ^a   Adang, R P ^a   Stockbrugger, R W ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DUODENOSCOPY; DYSPEPSIA; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; GASTROSCOPY; HUMAN; LETTER; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0029760520     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0016-5107(96)70241-9     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. G Minoli A Prada G Gambetta The ASGE guidelines for the appropriate use of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in an open access system Gastrointest Endosc 42 1995 387 389
2. RP Adang JF-JFE Vismans JL Talmon A Hasman AW Ambergen RW Stockbrödugger Appropriateness of indications for diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: association with relevant endoscopic disease Gastrointest Endosc 42 1995 390 397
3. JL. Achord Physician or technician? Gastrointest Endosc 42 1995 490 491
4. ATR Axon GD Bell RH Jones MA Quine RF. McCloy Guidelines on appropriate indications for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy BMJ 310 1995 853 856