Wound coverage: Is there a difference?

Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 416-420

  Hastings, Barry ^a   Roth, Adam ^b   Nolan, Dan ^b   Miller, Sidney ^b  

^a WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLOGRAFT; AMNION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BURN DRESSING; CADAVER; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST; NONHUMAN; RABBIT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WOUND DRESSING; WOUND HEALING; WOUND INFECTION; XENOGRAFT;

EID: 0029758897     PISSN: 02738481     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004630-199609000-00008     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Mardovin W, Miller SF, Eppinger M, Finley R. Micrografts: the "super" expansion graft. J Burn Care Rehabil 1992;13: 556-9.
2. Alsbjorn BF. Biologic wound coverings in burn treatment. World J Surg 1992;16:43-6.
3. Clarke JA. HIV transmission and skin grafts [Letter]. Lancet 1987;1:983.
4. Pruitt BA, Levine NS. Characteristics and uses of biologic dressings and skin substitutes. Arch Surg 1984;119:312-22.
5. Barnett A, Berkowitz RL, Mills RM, Vistnes LM. Comparison of synthetic adhesive moisture vapor permeable and fine mesh gauze dressings for split-thickness skin graft donor sites. Am J Sur 1983;145:379-81.
6. Purdue GF, Hunt JL, Gillespie RW, et al. Biosynthetic skin substitute versus frozen human cadaver allograft for temporary coverage of excised burn wounds. J Trauma 1987;27: 155-7.
7. Gerding RL, Emerman CL, Effron D, et al. Outpatient management of partial-thickness burns: biobrane® versus 1% silver sulfadiazine. Ann Emerg Med 1990;19:121-4.
8. Feldman DL, Rogers A, Karpinski RHS. A prospective trial comparing biobrane®, duoderm, and xeroform for skin graft donor sites. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1991;173:1-5.
9. Stair TO, D'Orta J, Altieri TF, Lippe MS. Polyurethane and silver sulfadiazine dressings in treatment of partial-thickness burns and abrasions. Am J Emerg Med 1986;4:214-7.
10. Kraft MR, Lawson L, Pohlmann B, Reid-Lokos C, Barder L. A comparison of epi-lock® and saline dressings in the treatment of pressure ulcers. Decubitus 1993;6:42-8.
11. Wayne MA. Clinical evaluation of epi-lock® - a semiocclusive dressing. Ann Emerg Med 1985;14:20-4.
12. Etris MB, Smith JA, Pasceri P, Punchello M. Case studies: considering dressing options. Ostomy Wound Manage 1994; 40:46-52.
13. Ainsworth P, Blache C, Dyess DL, Luterman A. The evaluation of the unna boot in lower leg autografts. Wounds 1991; 3:195-7.
14. Dillon ME, Okunski WJ. Silon non-adherent film dressings on autograft and donor sites. Wounds 1992;4:203-7.