Relationship between flowering phenology of perennial herbs and meteorological data in deciduous forests of Sweden

Canadian Journal of Botany

Volumn 74, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 528-537

  Diekmann, Martin ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Degree days; Full flowering; Photoperiod; Solar radiation; Temperature sum

Indexed keywords

DECIDUOUS FOREST; FLOWERING; PHENOLOGY; PHOTOPERIOD; TEMPERATURE;

SWEDEN, UPPSALA;

EID: 0029752524     PISSN: 00084026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/b96-067     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Anstey, T.H. 1966. Prediction of full bloom date for apple, pear, cherry, peach and apricot from air temperature data. Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 88: 57-66.
2. Arnell, H.W. 1923. Vegetationens årliga utvecklingsgång i Svealand. Medd. Stat. Meteorol.-Hydr. Anstalt, 2(1): 1-80.
3. Arnold, C.Y. 1959. The determination and the significance of the base temperature in a linear heat unit system. Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 74: 430-445.
4. Arnold, S.M., and Monteith, J.L. 1974. Plant development and mean temperature in a Teesdale habitat. J. Ecol. 62: 711-720.
5. Beaubien, E.G., and Johnson, D.L. 1994. Flowering plant phenology and weather in Alberta, Canada. Int. J. Biometeorol. 38: 23-27.
6. Cannell, M.G.R., and Smith, R.I. 1983. Thermal time, chill days and prediction of bud burst in Picea sitchensis. J. Appl. Ecol. 20: 951-963.
7. Caprio, J.M. 1974. The solar thermal unit concept in problems related to plant development and potential evapotranspiration. In Phenology and seasonality modelling. Edited by H. Lieth. Ecol. Stud. Anal. Synth. 8: 353-364.
8. Carlson, J.D., and Hancock, J.F., Jr. 1991. A methodology for determining suitable heat-unit requirements for harvest of highbush blueberry. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 116: 774-779.
9. de Réaumur, R.A.F. 1735. Observations du thermomètre, faites à Paris pendant l'année 1735, comparée avec celles qui ont été faites sous la ligne, à l'Ile de France, à Alger et quelques-unes de nos isles de l'Amérique. Mém. Acad. R. Sci. Pays-Bas, 1735: 737-754.
10. Diekmann, M. 1994. Deciduous forest vegetation in Boreo-nemoral Scandinavia. Acta Phytogeogr. Suec. 80: 1-112.
11. Dierschke, H. 1983. Symphänologische Artengruppen sommergrüner Laubwälder und verwandter Gesellschaften Mitteleuropas. Verh. Ges. Ökol. 11: 71- 87.
12. Dierschke, H. 1989. Symphänologischer Aufnahme- und Bestimmungsschlüssel für Blütenpflanzen und ihre Gesellschaften in Mitteleuropa. Tuexenia, 9: 477-484.
13. Due, G., Morris, M., Pattison, S., and Coombe, B.G. 1993. Modelling grapevine phenology against weather: considerations based on a large data set. Agric. For. Meteorol. 65: 91-106.
14. Fitter, A.H., Fitter, R.S.R., Harris, I.T.B., and Williamson, M.H. 1995. Relationships between first flowering date and temperature in the flora of a locality in central England. Funct. Ecol. 9: 55-60.
15. Hopp, R.J. 1974. Plant phenology observation networks. In Phenology and seasonality modelling. Edited by H. Lieth. Ecol. Stud. Anal. Synth. 8: 25-43.
16. Kish, A.J., Ogle, W.L., and Loadholt, C.B. 1972. A prediction technique for snap bean maturity incorporating soil moisture with the heat unit system. Agric. Meteorol. 10: 203-209.
17. Lappalainen, H. 1994. Examples of plant phenological events in Finland and their relation to temperature. Memo. Soc. Fauna Flora Fenn. 70: 105-121.
18. Lauscher, A., Lauscher, F., and Printz, H. 1955. Die Phänologie Norwegens; Teil I: Allgemeine Übersicht. Skr. Nor. Vidensk. Akad. Oslo I Mat. Naturvidensk. Kl. 1: 1-99.
19. Lettau, K. 1965. A new method for predicting the blooming date of spring flowers. Append. Trans. Wisc. Acad. Sci. Arts Lett. 54: 135-142.
20. Lindsey, A.A. 1963. Accuracy of duration temperature summing and its use for Prunus serrulata. Ecology, 44: 149-151.
21. Lindsey, A.A., and Newman, J.E. 1956. Use of official weather data in spring time: temperature analysis of an Indiana phenological record. Ecology, 37: 812-823.
22. Linnaeus, C. 1751. Philosophia botanica. Kiesewetter, Stockholm.
23. Linnemann, A.R., and Craufurd, P.Q. 1994. Effects of temperature and photoperiod on phenological development in three genotypes of Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea). Ann. Bot. (Lond.), 74: 675-681.
24. Perry, K.B., Wehner, T.C., and Johnson, G.L. 1986. Comparison of 14 methods to determine heat unit requirements for cucumber harvest. HortScience, 21: 419-423.
25. Podolsky, A.S. 1984. New phenology. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
26. Rathcke, B., and Lacey, E.P. 1985. Phenological patterns of terrestrial plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16: 179-214.
27. Reuter, M. 1928. Pflanzenphänologische Beobachtungen in Finnland 1924, 1925 und 1926. Bidrag till kännedom af Finlands natur och folk, 80(9): 5-46.
28. Sauer, R.H. 1976. The relationship of cumulative sums and moving averages of temperature to reproductive phenology in Clarkia. Am. Midl. Nat. 95: 144-158.
29. Schnelle, F. 1955. Pflanzen-Phänologie. Geest und Portig K.-G., Leipzig.
30. Schrödter, H. 1952. Untersuchungen über die "Temperatursummenregel" an Hand der phänologischen Beobachtungen in Wernigerode 1854-1884. Angew. Meteorol. 1: 225-234.
31. Tuhkanen, S. 1980. Climatic parameters and indices in plant geography. Acta Phytogeogr. Suec. 67: 1-105.
32. van der Weide, R.Y. 1992. Phenology of arable and hedgerow populations of Galium aparine L. in relation to climate and soil conditions. Weed Res. 32: 249-258.
33. Wang, J.Y. 1960. A critique of the heat unit approach to plant response studies. Ecology, 41: 785-790.
34. White, L.M. 1979. Relationship between meteorological measurements and flowering of index species to flowering of 53 plant species. Agric. Meteorol. 20: 189-204.
35. Wilkinson, L. 1990. SYSTAT: the system for statistics. Systat Inc., Evanston, IL, U.S.A.