Age-corrected normal values with the Tubingen Automatic Perimeter TAP 2000 CC;Alterskorrigierte Normalwerte am Tubinger Automatikperimeter TAP 2000 CC

Ophthalmologe

Volumn 93, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 428-432

  Wohlrab, Th M ^a   Erb, C ^a   Rohrbach, J M ^a   Thiel, H J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

age corrected threshold; normal values; perimetry; Tubingen Automatic Perimeter

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AGING; COMPUTER ASSISTED PERIMETRY; CONFERENCE PAPER; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT; ADOLESCENT; AGE; ARTICLE; INSTRUMENTATION; MIDDLE AGED; PERIMETRY; PHYSIOLOGY; REFERENCE VALUE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL PROCESSING; VISUAL FIELD;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIMETRY; REFERENCE VALUES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 0029747223     PISSN: 0941293X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Aulhorn E (1964) Über die Beziehung zwischen Lichtsinn und Sehschärfe. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 167: 4-74
2. Aulhorn E, Durst W (1982) Rasterperimetrie in der augenärztlichen Praxis. Fortschr Ophthalmol 79:350-353
3. Aulhorn E, Lüddeke H (1977) Das periphere Gesichtsfeld. Ber Zusammenkunft Dtsch Ophthalmol Ges 74:33-42
4. Brenton RS, Phelbs CD (1986) The normal visual field on the Humphrey field analyzer. Ophthalmologica 193:56-74
5. Drance SM, Berry V, Hughes A (1967) Studies on the effects of age on the central and peripheral isopters of the visual fields in normal subjects. Am J Ophthalmol 63:1667-1672
6. Federman JL, Gouras P (1994) Retina and vitreous. Mosby, St Louis, pp 9-11
7. Field Analyzer Fibel (1987) Field analyzer Fibel 2nd edn. Allergan Humphrey. Karlsruhe, ISBN 0-939-425-01-7
8. Haas AL (1989) Normalwerte für den Octopus und ihre Bedeutung bei der Befundinterpretation. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 194:320-321
9. Heijl A, Lindgren G, Olsson J (1987) Normal variability of static perimetric threshold values across the central visual field. Arch Ophthalmol 105:1544-1549
10. Heijl A, Lindgren G, Olsson J (1989) The effect of perimetric experience in normal subjects. Arch Ophthalmol 107:81-86
11. Iwase A, Kitazawa Y, Ohno Y (1988) On age-related norms of the visual field. Jpn J Ophthalmol 32:429-437
12. Jaffe G, Alvarado JA, Juster RP (1986) Age-related changes of the normal visual field. Arch Ophthalmol 104:1021-1025
13. Mutlakan E, Skarf B (1994) Diffuse vs localized visual field defects in primary open angle glaucoma (abstract 4288). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 35:2182
14. Naumann GOH, Apple DJ (1980) Embryologie, Anatomie und Untersuchungstechnik. In: Naumann GOH (Hrsg) Pathologie des Auges. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, S 38
15. Perimeter Digest (1983) Octopus. Bern
16. Rukmani N, Sekhar GC, Mandal AK (1994) Diffuse loss: a specific form of glaucomatous damage (abstract 4276). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 35:2180