Urodynamic evaluation of alpha-1 blocker tamsulosin on benign prostatic hyperplasia using pressure-flow study

Japanese Journal of Urology

Volumn 87, Issue 8, 1996, Pages 1048-1055

  Miyatake, Ryuichiro ^a   Park, Young Chol ^a   Koike, Hiroyui ^a   Ohnishi, Norio ^a   Sugiyama, Takahide ^a   Kurita, Takashi ^a   Esa, Atsunobu ^b   Kiwamoto, Hiro ^c  

^a KINKI UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b Hanwasenboku Hospital

^c Wakakusa Daiichi Hospital   (Japan)

Author keywords

alpha 1 blocker; benign prostatic hyperplasia; voiding work

Indexed keywords

ALPHA 1 ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; TAMSULOSIN;

BLADDER NECK STENOSIS; BLADDER PRESSURE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DETRUSOR DYSSYNERGIA; DETRUSOR MUSCLE; DRUG EFFECT; HUMAN; MALE; MICTURITION; PROSTATE HYPERTROPHY; REVIEW; URINE FLOW RATE; URODYNAMICS;

EID: 0029746703     PISSN: 00215287     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5980/jpnjurol1989.87.1048     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Abram, P.H. and Griffiths, D.J.: The assessment of prostatic obstruction from urodynamic measurements and from residual urine Brit. J. UroL, 51, 129-134, 1979.
2. Jensen, K.M.-E., Jørgensen, J.B. and Mogensen, P. : Urodynamics in prostatism. II. Prognostic value of pressure-flow study combined with stop flowtest. Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol. Suppl., 114, 72-77, 1988.
3. McLouglin, J., Gill, K.P., Abel, P.D. and William, G.: Symptoms versus flow rates versus urodynarnics in the selection of patients for prostatectomy. Br. J. Urol., 66, 303-305, 1990.
4. Schäfer, W., Noppeney, R., Rubben, H. and Lutzeyer, W.: The value of free flow rate and pressure-flow studies in the routine investigation of BPH patients Neuro. Urol. Urodyn., 7, 219-211, 1988.
5. Schäfer, W.: The contribution of the bladder outlet to the relation between presure and flow rate during micturition. in Hinman, F. Jr. (ed), Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy. New York, Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer Verlag, p. 470-496, 1983.
6. Chancellor, M.B., Blaivas, J.G., Kaplan, S.A. and Axelrod, S.: Bladder outlet obstruction versus impaired detrusor contractility: The role of outflow. J. Urol., 145, 810-812, 1991.
7. Schäfer, W.: Detrusor muscle mechanics in clinical urodynamics In Krane, R J., Siroky, M. B. (eds). Clinical Neurourol. 2nd ed., Boston: Little, Brown, p. 109-150.
8. Schäfer, W.: Urethral resistance? Urodynamics concepts of physiological and pathological bladder outlet function during voiding. Neuro. Urol. Urodyn., 4, 161-201, 1985.
9. Jørgensen, J.B., Jensen, K.M.-E., Billebrahe, N. E., Bille-Brahe, N.E. and Mogensen, P.: Uroflowmetry in asymptomatic elderly males. Brit. J. Urol., 58, 390-395, 1991.
10. Jensen, K.M.-E., Jørgensen, J B. and Mogensen, P.: Urodynamics in prostatism. I. Prognostic value of uroflowmetry. Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol. Suppl., 114, 63-71, 1988.
11. Abrams, P.H., Farrar, D.J., Turner-Warwick, R. T., Whiteside, C.G. and Fenely, R.C.L.: The results of prostatectomy: Asymptomatic and urodynamic analysis of 152 patients. J. Urol., 121, 640-642, 1979.
12. Meyhoff, H.H.: Transurethral versus transvesical prostatectomy. Scand. J. Urol. Suppl., 102, 1-26, 1987.
13. Nielsen, K.K., Kromann-Andersen, B., Poulsen, A.L., Schou, J. and Nordling, J.: Subjective and objective evaluation of patients with prostatism and inflavesical obstruction treated with both intraprostatic spiral and transurethral prostatectomy Neuro. Urol. Urodyn., 13, 13-19, 1994.
14. Kabalin, J.N., Gill, H.S., Bite, G. and Wolfe, V.: Comparative study of laser versus electrocautery prostatic resection: 18-month folowup with complex urodynamic assessment. J. Urol., 153, 94-98, 1995.
15. van Mastrigt, R. and Rollema, H.J.: The prognostic value of bladder contractility in transurethral resection of the prostate. J Urol., 148, 1856, 1992.
16. Griffiths, D.J., Constantinou, C.E. and van Mastrigt, R.: Urinary bladder function and its control in healthy females. Amer. J. Physiol., 251, R225, 1986.