Application of sensitive mouse lymph node assay for detection of contact sensitization capacity of dyes

Journal of Applied Toxicology

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 349-354

  Ikarashi, Yoshiaki ^a   Tsuchiya, Toshie ^a   Nakamura, Akitada ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF HEALTH SCIENCES   (Japan)

Author keywords

Contact allergen; Dye; Lymphocyte proliferation; Mouse; Sensitization test

Indexed keywords

ANTHRAQUINONE DERIVATIVE; AZO DYE; CONTACT ALLERGEN; DYE; ERYTHROSINE; OIL SCARLET; QUINIZARIN; QUINOLINE DERIVATIVE; SUDAN I;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BIOASSAY; CELL ACTIVITY; CELL PROLIFERATION; CONTACT SENSITIZATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG SCREENING; FEMALE; GUINEA PIG; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LYMPH NODE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PATCH TEST; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TECHNIQUE; TOPICAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION;

ALLERGENS; ANIMALS; CELL DIVISION; COLORING AGENTS; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; FEMALE; LYMPH NODES; MICE; MICE, INBRED BALB C; OXAZINES; TOXICITY TESTS; XANTHENES;

ANIMALIA; CAVIA PORCELLUS; SUS SCROFA;

EID: 0029743555     PISSN: 0260437X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1263(199607)16:4<349::AID-JAT351>3.0.CO;2-5     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. K. L. Hatch, Chemical and textiles. Part I. Dermatological problems related to fiber content and dyes. Textile Res. J. 54, 664-682 (1984).
2. K. L. Hatch and H. I. Maibach, Textile dye dermatitis. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 12, 1079-1092 (1985).
3. S. Seidenari, B. M. Manzini and P. Danese, Contact sensitization to textile dyes: description of 100 subjects. Contact Dermatitis 24, 253-258 (1991).
4. R. L. Baer, D. L. Ramsey and E. Biondi, The most common contact allergens 1968-1970. Arch. Dermatol. 108, 74-78 (1973).
5. E. Cronin, Contact Dermatitis. Churchill Livingston, Edinburgh (1980).
6. P. A. Botham, D. A. Basketter, T. Maurer, D. Mueller, M. Potokar and W. J. Bontinck, Skin sensitization - a critical review of predictive test methods in animals and man. Food Chem. Toxicol. 29, 275-286 (1991).
7. B. Magnusson and A. M. Kligman, Allergic Contact Dermatitis in the Guinea Pig: Identification of Contact Allergens. C. C. Thomas, Springfield, IL (1970).
8. I. Kimber and C. Weisenberger, A murine local lymph node assay for the identification of contact allergens: assay development and results of an initial validation study. Arch. Toxicol. 63, 274-282 (1989).
9. I. Kimber, J. Hilton and C. Weisenberger, The murine local lymph node assay for identification of contact allergens: a preliminary evaluation of in situ measurement of lymphocyte proliferation. Contact Dermatitis 21, 215-220 (1989).
10. E. W. Sholes, D. A. Basketter, A. E. Sarll, I. Kimber, C. D. Evans, K. Miller, M. C. Robbins, P. T. C. Harrison and S. J. Waite, The local lymph node assay: results of a final inter-laboratory validation under field conditions. J. Appl. Toxicol. 12, 217-222 (1992).
11. I. Kimber, J. Hilton and P. A. Botham, Identification of contact allergens using the murine local lymph node assay: comparisons with the Buehler occluded patch test in guinea pigs. J. Appl. Toxicol. 10, 173-180 (1990).
12. D. A. Basketter and E. W. Sholes, Comparison of the local lymph node assay with the guinea pig maximization test for the detection of a range of contact allergens. Food Chem. Toxicol. 30, 65-69 (1992).
13. Y. Ikarashi, T. Tsuchiya and A. Nakamura, A sensitive mouse lymph node assay with two application phases for the detection of contact allergens. Arch. Toxicol. 67, 626-636 (1993).
14. Y. Ikarashi, K. Ohno, J. Momma, T. Tsuchiya and A. Nakamura, Assessment of contact sensitivity of four thiourea rubber accelerators: comparison of two mouse lymph node assays with the guinea pig maximization test. Food Chem. Toxicol. 32, 1067-1072 (1994).
15. T. Mosmann, Rapid colorimetric assay for the cellular growth and survival: Application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assay. J. Immunol. Methods 65, 55-63 (1983).
16. U. Landegren, Measurement of cell numbers by means of the endogenous enzyme hexosaminidase. Applications to detection of lymphokines and cell surface antigen. J. Immunol. Methods 67, 379-388 (1984).
17. T. Porstmann, T. Ternynck and S. Avrameas, Quantitation of 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine incorporation into DNA: an enzyme immunoassay for the assessment of the lymphoid cell proliferative response. J. Immunol. Methods 82, 169-179 (1988).
18. J. P. Magaud, I. Sargent and D. Y. Mason, Detection of human white cell proliferative responses by immunoenzymatic measurement of bromodeoxyuridine uptake. J. Immunol. Methods 106, 95-100 (1988).
19. 3H]thymidine incorporation assay. J. Immunol. Methods 170, 211-224 (1994).
20. T. Kozuka, M. Tashiro, S. Sano, K. Fujimoto, Y. Nakamura, S. Hashimoto and G. Nakaminami, Pigmented contact dermatitis from azo dyes (I). Cross-sensitivity in human. Contact Dermatitis 6, 330-336 (1980).
21. J. Okada, R. Kanbe, M. Kuzukawa, Y. Ikeda, K. Yoshimura, R. Hayakawa and K. Matsunaga, Identification of contact allergens in C. I. Solvent Red 23 (commercial Sudan III) by chemical analysts and animal testing. Contact Dermatitis 25, 313-318 (1991).
22. Y. Sato, Y. Katsumura, H. Ichikawa, T. Kobayashi, T. Kozuka, F. Morikawa and S. Ohta, A modified technique of guinea pig testing to identify delayed hypersensitivity allergens. Contact Dermatitis 7, 225-237 (1981).
23. M. Utsumi, T. Sugai, A. Syouji and K. Watanabe, Lipstick dermatitis due to Lithol Rubin BCA. Skin Res. 11 (33), 238-244 (1991).
24. R. Hayakawa, Y. Fujimoto and M. Kaniwa, Allergic pigmented lip dermatitis from lithol Rubin BCA. Am. J. Contact Dermatitis 5, 34-37 (1994).
25. B. M. Hausen, Contact allergy to disperse blue 106 and blue 124 in black "velvet" clothes. Contact Dermatitis 28, 169-173 (1993).
26. D. M. Sailstad, J. S. Tepper, D. L. Doerfler, H. Qasim and M. K. Selgrade, Evaluation of azo and two anthraquinone dyes for allergic potential. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 23, 569-577 (1994).
27. B. M. Hausen and E. M. Sawall, Sensitization experiments with textile dyes in guinea pigs. Contact Dermatitis 20, 27-31 (1989).
28. B. M. Hausen and F. Menezes Brandao, Disperse blue 106, a strong sensitizer. Contact Dermatitis 15, 102-103 (1986).
29. F. Menezes Brandao, C. Altermalt, M. Pecegueiro, O. Bordalo and J. Foussereau, Contact dermatitis to disperse blue 106. Contact Dermatitis 13, 80-84 (1985).
30. A. E. Rohold, G. D. Nielsen and K. E. Anderson, Nickel-sulphate-induced contract dermatitis in the guinea pig maximization test: a dose-response study. Contact Dermatitis 24, 35-39 (1991).
31. A. Nakamura, J. Momma, H. Sekiguchi, T. Noda, T. Yamano, M. Kaniwa, S. Kojima, M. Tsuda and Y. Kurokawa, A new protocol and criteria for quantitative determination of sensitization potencies of chemicals by guinea pig maximization test. Contact Dermatitis 31, 72-85 (1994).