DNA exposure and condensation in the X and 21 chromosomes

Stem Cells

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 548-557

  Puck, Theodore T ^a,b,c   Johnson, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DENVER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Chromosome 21; Chromosome condensation; Gene exposure; Gene sequestration; Nuclear DNA positioning; X chromosome

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE G1 PHASE; CHROMOSOME 21; CHROMOSOME CONDENSATION; CHROMOSOME PAINTING; FIBROBLAST; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GENE CONTROL; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; NUCLEOLUS; PROTEIN DNA INTERACTION; X CHROMOSOME; X CHROMOSOME INACTIVATION;

EID: 0029742502     PISSN: 10665099     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/stem.140548     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Puck TT. Human Gene Mapping, Exposure and Expression, Banbury Report. Cold Spring Harbor, New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1983;14:205-213.
2. Schonberg S, Patterson D, Puck TT. Resistance of Chinese hamster ovary cell chromatin to endonuclease digestion I. Reversal by cyclic AMP. Exp Cell Res 1983;145:57-62.
3. Puck TT. Genetic regulation and growth control: role of cyclic AMP and cell cytoskeleton. Somat Cell Mol Genet 1987;13:451-457.
4. Ashall F, Sullivan N, Puck TT. Specificity of cAMP-induced gene exposure reaction in CHO cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1988;85:3908-3912.
5. Puck TT, Krystosek A, Chan DC. Genome regulation in mammalian cells. Somat Cell Mol Genet 1990;16:257-265.
6. Krystosek A, Puck TT. The spatial distribution of exposed nuclear DNA in normal, cancer, and reverse-transformed cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990;87:6560-6564.
7. Puck TT, Krystosek A. Role of the cytoskeleton in genome regulation and cancer. Int Rev Cytology 1992;132:75-108.
8. Puck TT, Bartholdi M, Krystosek A et al. Confocal microscopy of genome exposure in normal, cancer, and reverse-transformed cells. Somat Cell Mol Genet 1991;17:489-503.
9. Puck TT, Krystosek A. Reverse transformation, genome exposure, and cancer. Adv Cancer Res 1993;2:125-151.
10. Haag MM, Krystosek A, Arenson E et al. Reverse transformation and genome exposure in the C6 glial cell line. Cancer Invest 1994;12:33-45.
11. Puck TT, Johnson R, Krystosek A. Functional interpretation of interphase chromosome domains. Mol Biol Cell 1992;3:173a.
12. Dyer KA, Canfield TK, Gartler SM. Molecular cytological differentiation of active from inactive X domains in interphase: implications for X chromosome inactivation. Cytogenet Cell Genet 1989;50:116-120.
13. Bischoff A, Albers J, Kharboush I et al. Differences of size and shape of active and inactive X-chromosome domains in human amniotic fluid. Cell Nuclei Microscopy Res Technique 1993;25:68-77.
14. Weintraub H, Groudine M. Chromosomal sub-units in active genes have an altered conformation. Science 1976;193:848-856.
15. Garel A, Axel R. Selective digestion of transcriptionally active ovalbumin genes from oviduct nuclei. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1976;73:3966-3970.
16. Kaplan PS, Murray J, Sylvester JE et al. The topographic organization of repetitive DNA in the human nucleolus. Genomics 1993;15(suppl 1):123-132.
17. Carter KC, Bowman D, Carrington W et al. A three-dimensional view of precursor messenger RNA metabolism within the mammalian nucleus. Science 1993;259:1330-1335.
18. Brown CJ, Miller AP, Xarrel L et al. The DXS423E gene in XP11.21 escapes X chromosome inactivation. Hum Mol Genet 1995;4(suppl 2):251-253.
19. Migeon B. X-chromosome inactivation: molecular mechanisms and genetic consequences. Trends Genet 1994;10:230-235.