Ordinal regression methodology for ROC curves derived from correlated data

Statistics in Medicine

Volumn 15, Issue 16, 1996, Pages 1807-1826

  Toledano, Alicia Y ^a   Gatsonis, Constantine ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; METHODOLOGY; ONCOLOGY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICS;

DIAGNOSIS; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, NEWBORN, DISEASES; LUNG; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NEOPLASM STAGING; OBSERVER VARIATION; RADIOGRAPHY, ABDOMINAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; ROC CURVE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 0029740924     PISSN: 02776715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960830)15:16<1807::AID-SIM333>3.0.CO;2-U     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Metz, C. E., Wang, P. and Kronman, H. B. 'A new approach for testing the significance of differences between ROC curves measured from correlated data', in: Deconinck, F. (ed), Information Processing in Medical Imaging, The Hague, Nijhof, 1984.
2. Hanley, J. A. and McNeil, B. J. 'A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases', Radiology, 148, 839-843 (1983).
3. DeLong, E. R., DeLong, D. M. and Clarke-Pearson, D. L. 'Comparing the areas under two or more correlated ROC curves: A nonparametric approach', Biometrics, 44, 837-845 (1988).
4. Dorfman, D. D., Berbaum, K. S. and Metz, C. E. 'Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis: Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method', Investigative Radiology, 27, 723-731 (1992).
5. Obuchowski, N. A. 'Multireader mutlimodality receiver operating characteristic curve studies: Hypothesis testing and sample size estimation using an analysis of variance approach with dependent observations', Academic Radiology, 2, S22-S29 (1995).
6. McCullagh, P. 'Regression models for ordinal data', Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 42, 109-142 (1980).
7. Dorfman, D. D. and Alf, E. 'Maximum-likelihood estimation of parameters of signal-detection theory and determination of confidence intervals Rating-Method data', Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 6, 487-496 (1969).
8. Tosteson, A. A. and Begg, C. B. 'A general regression methodology for ROC curve estimation', Medical Decision Making, 8, 204-215 (1988).
9. Thisted, R. A. 'Assessing the effect of allergy medication: Models for paired comparisons on ordered categories', Technical report no. 307, Department of Statistics and Anesthesia and Critical Care, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, 1991.
10. Kim, K. 'A regression model for bivariate ordered categorical data', Unpublished manuscript, 1991.
11. Liang, K. and Zeger, S. L. 'Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models', Biometrika, 73, 13-22 (1986).
12. Lipsitz, S, R., Kim, K. and Zhao, L. 'Analysis of repeated categorical data using generalized estimating equations', Statistics in Medicine, 13, 1149-1163 (1994).
13. Toledano, A. Y. 'Generalized estimating equations for repeated ordinal categorical data, with applications to diagnostic medicine', Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, 1993.
14. Liang, K. Y., Zeger, S. L. and Qaqish, B. 'Multivariate regression analyses for categorical data', Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 54, 3-40 (1992).
15. Swets, J. A. and Pickett, R. M. Evaluation of Diagnostic Systems: Methods from Signal Detection Theory, New York, 1982.
16. McCullagh, P. and Nelder, J. A. Generalized Linear Models, 2nd edn, Chapman and Hall, New York, 1989.
17. Begg, C. B. and Greenes, R. A. 'Assessment of diagnostic tests when disease verification is subject to selection bias', Biometrics, 39, 207-215 (1983).
18. Greenes, R. A. and Begg, C. B. 'Assessment of diagnostic technologies: Methodology for unbiased estimation from samples of selectively verified patients', Investigative Radiology, 20, 751-756 (1985).
19. Gray, R., Begg, C. B. and Greenes, R. A. 'Construction of receiver operating characteristic curves when disease verification is subject to selection bias', Medical Decision Making, 4, 151-164 (1984).
20. Webb, W. R., Gatsonis, C., Zerhouni, E. A., Heelan, R. T., Glazer, G. M., Francis, I. R. and McNeil, B. J. 'CT and MR imaging in staging non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma: Report of the radiologie diagnostic oncology group', Radiology, 178, 705-713 (1991).
21. Franken, E. A. Jr., Berbaum, K. S., Marley, S. M., Smith, W. L., Sato, Y., Kao, S. C. S. and Milam, S. G. 'Evaluation of a digital workstation for interpreting neonatal examinations: A receiver operating characteristic study', Investigative Radiology, 27, 732-737 (1992).
22. Gatsonis, C. A. 'Random-effects models for diagnostic accuracy data', Academic Radiology, 2, S14 S21 (1995).
23. Qu, Y., Piedmonte, M. R. and Medendorp, S. V. 'Latent variable models for clustered ordinal data', Biometrics, 51, 268-275 (1995).
24. Miller, M. E., Davis, C. S. and Landis, J. R. 'The analysis of longitudinal polytomous data: Generalized estimating equations and connections with weighted least squares', Biometrics, 49, 1033-1044 (1993).