On planning of samples for linkage analysis: Two ways of a sample size reduction

Genetic Epidemiology

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 343-354

  Ginsburg, E Kh ^a   Axenovich, T I ^b  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b INSTITUTE OF CYTOLOGY AND GENETICS   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

bilinear pedigrees; highly informative marker; incomplete penetrance; pedigree structure

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETIC MARKER; HETEROZYGOTE DETECTION; PEDIGREE ANALYSIS; PENETRANCE; SAMPLE;

GENOTYPE; HETEROZYGOTE; HUMANS; LINKAGE (GENETICS); LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; PEDIGREE;

EID: 0029738977     PISSN: 07410395     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1996)13:4<343::AID-GEPI3>3.0.CO;2-5     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Axenovich TI, Ginsburg EKh (1993a): On the planning of samples for linkage analysis. II. A sample size and an ascertainment. Genetika 29:1544-1553.
2. Axenovich TI, Ginsburg EKh (1993b): On the planning of samples for linkage analysis. III. Incomplete penetrance. Genetika 29:1741-1749
3. Cavalli-Sforza LL, King MC (1986): Detecting linkage for genetically heterogeneous diseases and detecting heterogeneity with linkage data. Am J Hum Genet 38:599-616.
4. Chotai J (1984): On the lod score method in linkage analysis. Ann Hum Genet 48:359-378.
5. Elston RC, Bonney CE (1984): Sampling consideration in the design and analysis of family studies. In: "Genetic Epidemiology of Coronary Heart Disease: Past, Present and Future." New York: Alan R. Liss, pp 349-371.
6. Ginsburg EKh, Axenovich TI (1992): A cooperative binomial ascertainment model. Am J Hum Genet 51:1156-1160.
7. Ginsburg EKh, Axenovich TI (1996): On the sample size required for a predefined linkage decision quality. Genet Epidemiol (submitted).
8. Ginsburg EKh, Axenovich TI, Goodman DW (1996): On estimation of linkage test power. Genet Epidemiol 13:355-365.
9. Hodge SE (1992): Do bilineal pedigrees represent a problem for linkage analysis? Basic principles and simulation results for single-gene diseases with no heterogeneity. Genet Epidemiol 9:191-206.
10. Kullback S (1959): "Information theory and statistics." New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
11. Ott J (1985): "Analysis of Genetic Linkage in Human Families." Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
12. 2. Biometrika 46:364.
13. Spence MA, Bishop DT, Boehnke M, Elston RC, Falk C, Hodge SE, Ott J, Rice J, Merikangas K, Kupfer D (1993): Methodological issues in linkage analysis for psychiatric disorders: Secular trends, assortative mating, bilineal pedigrees. Hum Hered 43:166-172.
14. Stene J (1977): Assumption for different ascertainment models in human genetics. Biometrics 29:523-527.
15. Stene J (1978): Choice of ascertainment model. I. Discrimination between single-proband models by means of birth order data. Ann Hum Genet 42:219-229.
16. Vogel F, Motulsky AG (1986): "Human Genetics: Problems and Approaches." Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
17. Wong FL, Canton RM, Rotter JI (1986): Sample-size considerations and strategies for linkage analysis in autosomal recessive disorders. Am J Hum Genet 39:25-37.