Picture-word differences in a sentence verification task

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 584-594

  Goolkasian, Paula ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; PROBLEM SOLVING; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 0029737580     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/bf03201085     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. BRAINERD, C. J., & REYNA, V. F. (1992). Explaining "memory free" reasoning. Psychological Science, 3, 332-339.
2. BRAINERD, C. J., & REYNA, V. F. (1993). Memory independence and memory interference in cognitive development. Psychological Review, 100, 42-67.
3. CARPENTER, P. A., & JUST, M. A. (1975). Sentence comprehension: A psycholinguistic processing model of verification. Psychological Review, 82, 45-83.
4. CLARK, H. H., & CHASE, W. G. (1972) On the process of comparing sentences against pictures. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 472-517
5. GLASER, W. R., & GLASER, M. O. (1989). Context effects in Stroop-like word and picture processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 13-42.
6. GLENBERG, A. M., & LANGSTON, W. E. (1992). Comprehension of illustrated text: Pictures help to build mental models. Journal of Memory & Language, 31, 129-151.
7. GOOLKASIAN, P., & PARK, D. C. (1980). Processing of visually presented clock times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 6, 707-717.
8. KROLL, J. F., & CORRIGAN, A. (1981). Strategies in sentence-picture verification: The effect of an unexpected picture. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 20, 515-531.
9. LARKIN, J. H., & SIMON, H. A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11, 65-99.
10. PAIVIO, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
11. PAIVIO, A. (1975). Perceptual comparisons through the mind's eye. Memory & Cognition, 3, 635-647.
12. PAIVIO, A. (1978). A dual coding approach to perception and cognition. In H. L. Pick & E. Saltzman (Eds.), Modes of perceiving and processing information (pp. 39-51). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. PELLEGRINO, J. W., ROSINSKI, R. R., CHIESI, H. L., & SIEGEL, A. (1977). Picture-word differences in decision latency: An analysis of single and dual memory models. Memory & Cognition, 5, 383-396.
14. POTTER, M. C. (1979). Mundane symbolism: The relations among objects, names, and ideas. In N. R. Smith & M. B. Franklin (Eds), Symbolic fuctioning in childhood (pp. 41-65). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. POTTER, M. C., & FAULCONER, B. A. (1975). Time to understand pictures and words. Nature, 253, 437-438.
16. SEYMOUR, P. H. (1973). A model for reading, naming, and comparison. British Journal of Psychology, 64, 35-49
17. SMITH, M. C., & MAGEE, L. E. (1980). Tracing the time course of picture-word processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 373-392.
18. SNODGRASS, F. G. (1984). Concepts and their surface representations. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 23, 3-22.
19. THEIOS, J., & AMRHEIN, P. C. (1989a). The role of spatial frequency and visual detail in the recognition of patterns and words. In C. Izawa (Ed.), Current issues in cognitive processes (pp 389-409). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. THEIOS, J., & AMRHEIN, P. C. (1989b). Theoretical analysis of the cognitive processing of lexical and pictorial stimuli: Reading, naming, and visual and conceptual comparisons. Psychological Review, 96, 5-24.