Mate selection by repeated inspection: More on pied flycatchers

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 51, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 739-745

  Getty, Thomas ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MATE CHOICE; PIED FLYCATCHER; SEARCH COST; TERRITORY; TRADE-OFF;

FICEDULA HYPOLEUCA; MUSCICAPIDAE;

EID: 0029730115     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1996.0078     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Alatalo, R. V. 1988. The search cost in mate choice of the pied flycatcher. Anim. Behav., 36, 289-291.
2. Bakker, T. C. 1991. Sequential female choice and the previous male effect in sticklebacks. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol, 29, 205-210.
3. Breipohl, A. M. 1970. Probabilistic Systems Analysis. New York: Wiley.
4. Dale, S. & Slagsvold, T. 1994. Polygyny and deception in the pied flycatcher: can females determine male mating status? Anim. Behav., 48, 1207-1217.
5. Dawkins, M. S. & Guilford, T. 1991. The corruption of honest signalling. Anim. Behav., 41, 865-873.
6. Dawkins, R. & Krebs, J. R. 1978. Animal signals: information or manipulation. In: Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach (Ed. by J. R. Krebs & N. B. Davies), pp. 282-309. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
7. Dombrovsky, Y. & Perrin, N. 1994. On adaptive search and optimal stopping in sequential mate choice. Am. Nat, 144, 355-361.
8. Downhower, J. F. & Lank, D. B. 1994. Effects of previous experience on mate choice by female mottled sculpins. Anim. Behav., 47, 369-372.
9. Endler, J. A. 1993. Some comments on the evolution and design of animal communication systems. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B, 340, 215-225.
10. Getty, T. 1995. Search, discrimination and selection: mate choice by pied flycatchers. Am. Nat., 145, 145-153.
11. Grafen, A. & Johnstone, R. A. 1993. Why we need ESS signalling theory. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B, 340, 245-250.
12. Hasson, O. 1994. Cheating signals. J. theor. Biol., 167, 223-238.
13. Johnstone, R. A. & Grafen, A. 1992. Error-prone signalling. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B, 248, 229-233.
14. Johnstone, R. A. & Grafen, A. 1993. Dishonesty and the handicap principle. Anim. Behav., 46, 759-764.
15. MacMillan, N. A. & Creelman, C. D. 1991. Detection Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Noe, R. & Hammerstein, P. 1994. Biological markets: supply and demand determine the effect of partner choice in cooperation, mutualism and mating. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol, 35, 1-11.
17. Real, L. 1990. Search theory and mate choice. I. Models of single-sex discrimination. Am. Nat., 136, 376-404.
18. Reeve, H. K. 1989. The evolution of conspecific acceptance thresholds. Am. Nat, 133, 407-436.
19. Searcy, W. A., Erickson, D. & Lundberg, A. 1991. Deceptive behaviour in pied flycatchers. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 29, 167-175.
20. Slagsvold, T. & Dale, S. 1994. Why do female pied flycatchers mate with already mated males: deception or restricted mate sampling. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 34, 239-250.
21. Temerin, H. & Stenius, S. 1994. How reliable are behavioral cues for assessment of male mating status in polyterritorial wood warblers, Phylloscopus slbilatrlx? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol, 35, 161-168.
22. Wiley, R. H. 1994. Errors, exaggeration, and deception in animal communication. In: Behavioral Mechanisms In Evolutionary Ecology (Ed. by E. A. Real), pp. 157-189. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.