A program for seismic wavefield modeling using finite-difference techniques

Computers and Geosciences

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 267-286

  Keiswetter, Dean ^a   Black, Ross ^a   Schmeissner, Chris ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Finite difference; FORTRAN 77; Seismic modeling; Wave propagation

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAM; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; FORTRAN; WAVE PROPAGATION;

EID: 0029729550     PISSN: 00983004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0098-3004(95)00078-X     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Alford, R. M., Kelly, K. R., and Boore, D. M., 1974, Accuracy of finite-difference modeling of the acoustic wave equation: Geophysics, v. 39, no. 6, p. 834-842.
2. Alterman, Z., and Karal, F. C., 1968, Propagation of elastic waves in layered media by finite-difference methods: Bull. Seism. Soc. America, v. 58, no. 1, p. 367-398.
3. Brekhovskikh, L. M., 1960, Waves in layered media: Academic Press, New York, 561 p.
4. Cerjan, C., Kosloff, D., Kosloff, R., and Reshef, M., 1985, A non-reflecting boundary condition for discrete acoustic and elastic wave equations: Geophysics, v. 50, no. 4, p. 705-708.
5. Chen, K., 1984, Numerical modeling of elastic wave propagation in anisotropic inhomogeneous media: a finite element approach (ext. abst): Soc. Expl. Geophys. 54th Intern. Mtg., p. 631-632.
6. Clay, C., 1990, Elementary exploration seismology: Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 346 p.
7. Clayton, R. W., and Engquist, B., 1977, Absorbing boundary conditions for acoustic and elastic wave equations: Bull. Seism. Society America, v. 67, no. 6, p. 1529-1540.
8. Gazdag, J., 1981, Modeling of the acoustic wave equation with transform methods: Geophysics, v. 46, no. 6, p. 854-859.
9. Keiswetter, D., and Bennett, B, 1995, A Windows™ application for generating input models for numerical modeling: Computers & Geosciences, v. 22, no. 3, p. 355-356.
10. Keiswetter, D., Black, R., and Steeples, D., 1994, Mapping bedrock beneath glacial till using CDP seismic reflection methods: Geophys. Res. Lett., v. 21, no. 6, p. 453-456.
11. Kelly, K., Alford, R, and Whitmore, N., 1982, Modeling -the forward method, in Jain, K., and deFigueiredo, R., eds., Concepts and Techniques in Oil and Gas Exploration: Soc. Explor. Geophys., Tulsa, Oklahoma, p.92-114.
12. Kelly, K., Ward, R., Treitel, S, and Alford, R., 1976, Synthetic seismograms, a finite-difference approach: Geophysics, v. 41, no. 1, p. 2-27.
13. Keys, R. G., 1985, Absorbing boundary conditions for acoustic media: Geophysics, v. 50, no. 6, p. 892-902.
14. Kosloff, D., and Baysal, E., 1982, Forward modeling by a Fourier method: Geophysics, v. 47, n. 10, p. 1402-1412.
15. Renaut, R. A., and Petersen, J., 1989, Stability of wide-angle absorbing boundary conditions for the wave equation: Geophysics, v. 54, no. 9, p. 1153-1163.
16. Reynolds, A. C., 1978, Boundary conditions for the numerical solution of wave propagation problems: Geophysics, v. 43, no. 6, p. 1099-1110.
17. Sheriff, R. E., 1991, Encyclopedic dictionary of exploration geophysics (3rd ed.): Soc. Expl. Geophys., Tulsa, Oklahoma, 376 p.
18. Shtivelman, V., 1985, Two-dimensional acoustic modeling by a hybrid method: Geophysics, v. 50, no. 8, p. 1273-1284.
19. Sochacki, J., Kubichek, R., George, J., Fletcher, W. R., and Smithson, S., 1987, Absorbing boundary conditions and surface waves: Geophysics, v. 54, no. 1, p. 60-71.