Evaluation of mental representation for same and mixed compatibility assignments

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 58, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 47-55

  Dornier, Lanie A ^a   Reeve, T Gilmour ^b  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; REACTION TIME; VISION;

CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0029704324     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03205474     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. COHEN, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. DORNIER, L. A., & REEVE, T. G. (1990). Evaluation of compatibility effects in the precuing of arm and direction parameters. Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport, 61, 37-49.
3. DUNCAN, J. (1977a). Response selection errors in spatial choice reactions tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 415-423.
4. DUNCAN, J. (1977b). Response selection rules in spatial choice reaction tasks. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 49-61). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. DUNCAN, J. (1978). Response selection in spatial choice reaction: Further evidence against associative models. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30, 429-440.
6. DUTTA, A., & PROCTOR, R. W. (1992). Persistence of stimulus-response compatibility effects with extended practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 801-809.
7. FITTS, P. M., & SEEGER, C. M. (1953). S-R compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 199-210.
8. GOODMAN, D., & KELSO, J. A. S. (1980). Are movements prepared in parts? Not under compatible (naturalized) conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 475-495.
9. HEISTER, G., SCHROEDER-HEISTER, P., & EHRENSTEIN, W. H. (1990). Spatial coding and spatio-anatomical mapping: Evidence for a hierarchical model of spatial stimulus-response compatibility. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 117-143). Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.
10. HENDRIX, A. J. P. (1986). Compatibility of precuing and of S-R mapping in choice reactions. Acta Psychologica, 62, 59-88.
11. KLAPP, S. T. (1977). Response programming, as assessed by reaction time, does not establish commands for particular muscles. Journal of Molar Behavior, 9, 301-312.
12. KORNBLUM, S., HASBROUCQ, T., & OSMAN, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility - A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
13. LADAVAS, E. (1990). Some aspects of spatial stimulus-response compatibility in adults and normal children. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 145-162). Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.
14. LADAVAS, E., & MOSCOVITCH, M. (1984). Must egocentric and environmental frames of reference be aligned to produce spatial S-R compatibility effects? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 205-215.
15. LARISH, D. D. (1986). Influence of stimulus-response translations on response programming: Examining the relationship of arm, direction, and extent of movement. Acta Psychologica, 61, 53-70.
16. LEONARD, J. A. (1959). Tactual choice reactions: I. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11, 76-83.
17. NICOLETTI, R., ANZOLA, G. P., LUPPINO, G., RIZZOLATTI, G., & UMILTÀ, C. (1982). Spatial compatibility effects on the same side of the body midline. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 8, 664-673.
18. NICOLETTI, R., & UMILTÀ, C. (1985). Responding with hand and foot: The right/left prevalence in spatial compatibility is still present. Perception & Psychophysics, 38, 211-216.
19. PROCTOR, R. W., & REEVE, T. G. (1986). Salient-feature coding operations in spatial precuing tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 12, 277-285.
20. PROCTOR, R. W., & REEVE, T. G. (1988). The acquisition of task-specific productions and modifications of declarative representations in spatial-precuing tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 182-196.
21. PROCTOR, R. W., & REEVE, T. G. (1990). Research on stimulus-response compatibility: Toward a comprehensive account. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 483-494). Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.
22. PROCTOR, R. W., REEVE, T. G., & VANZANDT, T. (1992). Salient-features coding in response selection. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior II (pp. 727-741). Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.
23. REEVE, T. G., & PROCTOR, R. W. (1984). On the advanced preparation of discrete finger responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 541-553.
24. REEVE, T. G., & PROCTOR, R. W. (1985). Non-motoric translation processes in the preparation of discrete finger responses: A rebuttal of Miller's (1985) analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 11, 234-240.
25. REEVE, T. G., & PROCTOR, R. W. (1990). The salient-features coding principle for spatial-and symbolic-compatibility effects. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 163-180). Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.
26. ROSENBAUM, D. A. (1980). Human movement initiation: Specification of arm, direction, and extent. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 444-474.
27. ROSENBAUM, D. A. (1983). The movement precuing technique: Assumptions, applications, and extensions. In R. A. Magill (Ed.), Memory and control of action (pp. 231-274). Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.
28. SIMON, J. R. (1969). Reactions toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Pschology, 81, 174-176.
29. UMILTÀ, C., & NICOLETTI, R. (1990). Spatial stimulus-response compatibility. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 89-116). Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.
30. WALLACE, R. J. (1971). S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88, 354-360.
31. WEEKS, D. J., & PROCTOR, R. W. (1990). Salient-features coding in the translation between orthogonal stimulus and response dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 355-366.