Modelling [s] to [∫] accommodation in English

Journal of Phonetics

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 113-137

  Nolan, Francis ^a   Holst, Tara ^a   Kühnert, Barbara ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0029693048     PISSN: 00954470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jpho.1996.0008     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bladon, R. A. W. & Nolan, F. (1977) A video-fluorographic investigation of tip and blade alveolars in English, Journal of Phonetics, 5, 185-93.
2. Browman, C. P. (1995) Assimilation as gestural overlap: comments on Holst and Nolan. In Phonology and phonetic evidence: papers in laboratory phonology IV (B. Connell & A. Arvaniti, editors), pp. 334-342. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Browman, C. P. & Goldstein, L. (1989) Articulatory gestures as phonological units, Phonology, 6, 201-251.
4. Browman, C. P. & Goldstein, L. (1990) Tiers in articulatory phonology, with some implications for casual speech. In Papers in laboratory phonology I: between the grammar and physics of speech (J. Kingston & M. E. Beckman, editors), pp. 341-376. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Browman, C. P. & Goldstein, L. (1992) Articulatory Phonology: an overview, Phonetica, 49, 155-80.
6. Cruttenden, A. (1994) Gimson's Pronunciation of English (5th edition). London: Arnold.
7. Fowler, C. (1980) Coarticulation and theories of extrinsic timing, Journal of Phonetics, 8, 113-133.
8. Fowler, C., Rubin, P., Remez, R. E., & Turvey, M. T. (1980) Implications for speech production of a general theory of action. In Speech production, Vol. 1 (B. Butterworth, editor), pp. 373-420. New York: Academic Press.
9. Hawkins, S. (1992). An introduction to task dynamics. In Papers in laboratory phonology II: gesture, segment, prosody (G. J. Doherty & D. R. Ladd, editors), pp. 9-25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Holst, T. & Nolan, F. (1995) The influence of syntactic structure on [s] to [∫] assimilation. In Phonology and phonetic evidence: papers in laboratory phonology IV (B. Connell & A. Arvaniti, editors), pp. 315-333. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Kelso, J. A. S., Saltzman, E. L., & Tuller, B. (1986) The dynamical perspective on speech production: data and theory, Journal of Phonetics, 14, 29-59.
12. Nolan, F. (1992) The descriptive role of segments: evidence from assimilation. In Papers in laboratory phonology II: gesture, segment, prosody (G. J. Docherty & D. R. Ladd, editors), pp. 261-280. Cambridge: CUP.
13. Nguyen, N. & Hoole, P. (1993) Frequency variations in the lowest main spectral peak in sibilant clusters. In Proceedings of the Eurospeech conference 1993, pp. 81-84.
14. Pandeli, H. (1993) The articulation of lingual consonants: an EPG study. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Cambridge.
15. Perkell, J. S., Boyce, S. E. & Stevens, K. N. (1979) Articulatory and acoustic correlates of the [s-š] distinction. In Speech communication papers presented at the 97th meeting of the ASA, Cambridge MA 12-16 June, 1979 (J. J. Wolf & D. H. Klatt, editors). New York: Acoustical Society of America.
16. Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., Zue, W. V., & Bernstein, J. (1978) An acoustic study of palatalisation of fricatives in American English, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 64, S92(A).
17. Stevens, K. N. (1972) The quantal nature of speech: evidence from articulatory-acoustic data. In Human communication: a unified view (E. E. David & P. B. Denes, editors), pp. 51-66. New York: McGraw-Hill.
18. Stevens, K. N. (1989) On the quantal nature of speech, Journal of Phonetics, 17, 3-45.
19. Umeda, N. (1977) Consonant duration in American English, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 61, 846-858.