The performance and market impact of dual trading: CME rule 552

Journal of Financial Intermediation

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 23-48

  Chang, Eric C ^a   Locke, Peter R ^b  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b Office of the Chief Economist   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0029692943     PISSN: 10429573     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jfin.1996.0003     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. CHANG, E. C., LOCKE, P. R., AND MANN, S. C. (1994). The effect of CME Rule 552 on dual traders, J. Futures Markets 14, 493-510.
2. Chicago Mercantile Exchange (1989). Letter dated May 8, 1989, to Director, Division of Trading and Markets, Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
3. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (1989). "Economic Analysis of Dual Trading on Commodity Exchanges." Washington, DC.
4. DEMSETZ, H. (1968). The cost of transacting, Quart. J. Econ. 82, 33-53.
5. FISHMAN, M. J., AND LONGSTAFF, F. A. (1992). Dual trading in futures markets, J. Finance 47, 643-772.
6. GROSSMAN, S. J. (1989). An economic analysis of dual trading. Unpublished mimeo. The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.
7. HARVEY, C. R., AND HUANG, R. D. (1991). Volatility in the foreign currency futures market, Rev. Finan. Stud. 4, 542-569.
8. JEGADEESH, N., AND SUBRAHMANYAM, A. (1993). Liquidity effects of the introduction of the S&P 500 index futures contract on the underlying stocks, J. Finance 66, 171-188.
9. KUSERK, G. J., AND LOCKE, P. R. (1991). Scalper behavior in futures markets: An empirical examination, J. Futures Markets 13(4), 409-432.
10. LOCKE, P. R., AND VENKATESH, P. C. (1995). Futures market transaction costs. Working paper. Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
11. NEWEY, W. K., AND WEST, K. D. (1987). A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica 55, 703-708.
12. SARKAR, A. (1995). The regulation of dual trading: Winners, losers and market impact, J. Finan. Intermediation 4, 77-93.
13. Securities and Exchange Commission (1936). "Report on the Feasibility and Advisability of the Complete Segregation of the Functions of Dealer and Broker." Washington, DC, United States Government Printing Office.
14. SILBER, W. L. (1984). Marketmaker behavior in an auction market: An analysis of scalpers in futures markets, J. Finance 39, 937-953.
15. SMIDT, S. (1985). Trading floor practices on futures and securities exchanges: Economics, regulation, and policy issues, in "Futures markets: Regulatory Issues" Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
16. SMITH, T., AND WHALEY, R. E. (1994). Assessing the costs of regulation: The case of dual trading, J. Law Econ. 37(1), 215-246.
17. STANLEY, K. L. (1981). Measuring the operational costs of dual trading: An analytical framework, J. Futures Markets 1(3), 329-336.
18. STOLL, H. R. (1978). The supply of dealer services in securities markets. J. Finance 33, 1133-1151.
19. STOLL, H. R. (1989). Inferring the components of the bid-ask spread: Theory and empirical tests, J. Finance 44, 115-134.
20. WALSH, M. J., AND DINEHART, S. J. (1991). Dual trading and futures market liquidity: An analysis of three Chicago Board of Trade contract markets, J. Futures Markets 11, 519-537.
21. WORKING, H. (1967). Tests of a theory concerning floor trading on commodity exchanges. Food Research Institute Studies, Volume VII, supplement.