Do management tasks differ by field of practice?

Administration in Social Work

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 17-30

  Raymond, Ginny T ^a   Teare, Robert J ^a   Atherton, Charles R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL; EDUCATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL PROFESSION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; REVIEW; SOCIAL WORK; STATISTICS; TASK PERFORMANCE; UNITED STATES;

ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL; DATA COLLECTION; EDUCATION, GRADUATE; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; SOCIAL WORK; SPECIALISM; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0029691278     PISSN: 03643107     EISSN: 15444376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J147v20n01_02     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Austin, D.M. (1983). Administrative practice in human services: Future directions for curriculum development. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 19(2), 141-161.
2. Bernard, L.D. (1995). A new role for graduate education. In R. J. Teare & B. Sheafor, Practice sensitive social work education: An empirical analysis of social work practice and practitioners. Alexandria, VA: Council on Social Work Education.
3. Boehm, W.W. (1968). Common and specific learnings for a graduate school of social work. Journal of Education for Social Work, 4(2), 15-26.
4. Compton, B.R., & Galaway, B. (1984). Social work processes. Chicago: The Dorsey Press.
5. Council on Social Work Education (1982). Curriculum policy for baccalaureate degree programs in social work education. New York: CSWE.
6. Council on Social Work Education (1991-1992). Summary of information on master of social work programs. Alexandria, VA: CSWE.
7. Cowger, C.D. (1984). Statistical significance tests: Scientific ritualism or scientific method? Social Service Review, 55(3), 358-372.
8. Edwards, R.L. (1987). The competing values approach as an integrating framework for the management curriculum. Administration in Social Work, 11(1), 1-13.
9. Gibleman, M., & Schervish, RH. (1993). Who we are; The social work labor force as reflected in the NASW membership. Washington, DC: National Association of Social Workers.
10. Gilbert, N., Miller, H., & Specht, H. (1980). An introduction to social work practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
11. Gummer, B., & Edwards, R.L. (1988). The enfeebled middle: Emerging issues in education for social administration. Administration in Social Work, 12(3), 13-23.
12. Hart, A.F. (1988). Training social administrators for leadership in the coming decades. Administration in Social Work, 12(3), 1-11.
13. Hepworth, D.H., & Larsen, J.A. (1992). Direct social work practice; Theory and skills (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
14. Hoefer, R. (1993). A matter of degree: Job skills for human service administrators. Administration in Social Work, 77(3), 1-20.
15. Johnson, L.C. (1992). Social work practice: A generalist approach (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
16. Labovitz, S. (1967). Some observations on measurements and statistics. Social Forces, 46(2), 151-160.
17. Labovitz, S. (1970). The assignment of numbers to rank order categories. American Sociological Review, 35(1), 515-524.
18. Lorr, M. (1983). Cluster analysis for social scientists. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
19. Menefee, D.T., & Thompson, JJ. (1994). Identifying and comparing competencies for social work management: A practice driven approach. Administration in Social Work, 18(3), 1-25.
20. Patti, R.J. (1977). Patterns of management activity in social welfare agencies. Administration in Social Work, 7(1), 5-18.
21. Perlmutter, F.D. (1984). Social administration and social work education: A contradiction in terms? Administration in Social Work, 5(3), 61-69.
22. Pincus, A., & Minahan, A. (1973). Social work practice: Model and method. Itasca, IL: F.E. Peacock.
23. Schriessheim, C., &. Schriessheim, J. (1974). Development and empirical investigation of new response categories to increase the validity of multiple response alternative questionnaires. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, 887-884.
24. Schwartz, S., & Dattalo P. (1990). Factors affecting student selection of macro specializations. Administration in Social Work, 14(3), 83-96.
25. Sherwood, D.A., & Daley, M.R. (1979). Curriculum directions for an upgraded MSW: Administration for everyone? Journal of Education for Social Work, 15(2), 65-72.
26. Shulman, L. (1992). The skills of helping: Individuals, families, and groups (3rd ed.). Itasca, IL; F.E. Peacock.
27. Teare, R.J. (1981). Social work practice in a public welfare setting: An empirical analysis. New York: Praeger.
28. Teare, R.J. (1983). ACSW study for the national association of social workers. Unpublished manuscript.
29. Teare, R.J. (1987). National survey of occupational social workers. Silver Spring, MD: National Association of Social Workers.
30. Teare, R.J., & Sheafor, B.W. (1992). The national social work task analysis studies: An overview. Paper presented to NASW and CSWE staff. Washington, DC.
31. Teare, R.J., & Sheafor, B.W. (Eds.) (1995). Practice-sensitive social work education: An empirical analysis of social work practice and practitioners. Alexandria, VA: Council on Social Work Education.
32. Zastrow, C. (1995). The practice of social work (5 th ed.). Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.