Receptivity and susceptibility of the domestic duck (anas platyrhynchos), the muscovy duck (cairina moschata), and their hybrid, the mule duck, to an experimental infection by eimeria mulardi

Avian Diseases

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 23-27

  Sercy, O ^a   Nie, K ^b   Pascalon, A ^a   Fort, G ^b   Yvore P ^b  

^a VETAGRO SUP   (France)

^b CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANAS; ANAS PLATYRHYNCHOS; ANAS SP.; CAIRINA MOSCHATA; EIMERIA; PLATYRHYNCHOS;

LIPID; PLASMA PROTEIN;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; BIRD DISEASE; BLOOD; COCCIDIOSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISEASE PREDISPOSITION; DUCK; EIMERIA; FEMALE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; MORTALITY; PARASITOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TIME; WEIGHT GAIN;

ANIMALS; BLOOD PROTEINS; COCCIDIOSIS; DISEASE SUSCEPTIBILITY; DUCKS; EIMERIA; FEMALE; LIPIDS; POULTRY DISEASES; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TIME FACTORS; WEIGHT GAIN;

EID: 0029691215     PISSN: 00052086     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/1592367     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Chabrol, E., and R. Charonnat. Une nouvelle réaction pour l'étude des lipides. L'oléidémie. Presse Med. 45:1713-1714. 1937.
2. Chauve, C. M., J. M. Gounel, and M. C. Reynaud. Les coccidies du canard mulard. Bilan d'une première enquête réalisée dans trois élevages du sudouest de la France. Avian Pathol. 20:713-719. 1991.
3. Chauve, C. M., J. Gastellu, and M. C. Reynaud. Pathogénicité d'Eimeria mulardi Chauve 1994 chez le canard mulard après infection expérimentale. Précision des stades pathogènes. Avian Pathol. 23: 557-568. 1994.
4. Chauve, C. M., M. C. Reynaud, and J. M. Gounel. Description d'Eimeria mulardi sp. nov. chez le canard mulard. Etude de la phase endogène de son cycle évolutif avec mise en évidence de développement intranucléaire. Parasite 1:15-22. 1994.
5. Digges, J. R. B., and M. G. Leahy. The duck industry in Australia. In: D. J. Farrell and P. Stapleton, eds. Duck production science and world practice. University of New England, pp. 240-247. 1985.
6. Gornall, A. G., C. J. Bardawill, and M. M. David. Determination of serum proteins by means of the biuret reaction. J. Biol. Chem. 177:751-766. 1949.
7. Licois, D., M. Coudert, M. Boivin, F. Drouet-Viard, and F. Provot. Selection and characterization of a precocious line of Eimeria intestinalis, an intestinal rabbit coccidium. Parasitol. Res. 76:192-198. 1990.
8. Mathis, G. F., and L. R. McDougald. Evaluation of interspecific hybrids of the chicken, Guinea fowl, and Japanese quail for innate resistance to coccidia. Avian Dis. 31:740-745. 1987.
9. Moulia, C. Modalités des interactions génétiques dans les systèmes hôte-parasite: l'association Nématodes (Oxyures)/Muridés (Mus) en zone d'hybridation hôte. Ph.D. Dissertation. Université de Montpellier II. 1992.
10. Pellerdy, L. Coccidia and coccidiosis. Akadémiai Kiado Ed, Budapest. 1965.
11. Williams, R. B. The development, efficacy and epidemiological aspects of Paracox™, a new coccidiosis vaccine for chickens. Pitman-Moore Europe, Harefield, Middlesex, UK. 1992.
12. Zuo, Y. X., X. L. Song, Y. Y. Lin, and Y. Tu. Surveys on the species of coccidia in domestic ducks in Yunnan. Chin. J. Vet. Sci. Technol. 9:13. 1990.