Great researcher . . . good teacher?

Journal of Professional Nursing

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 31-38

  Melland, Helen I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Faculty; Publish or perish; Publishing; Research; Scholarship; Universities

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; HUMAN; NURSING EDUCATION; NURSING RESEARCH; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STANDARD; TEACHING; UNITED STATES; WRITING;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AUTHORSHIP; EDUCATION, NURSING, BACCALAUREATE; EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL; FACULTY, NURSING; HUMANS; NURSING RESEARCH; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TEACHING; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0029687616     PISSN: 87557223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S8755-7223(96)80072-X     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Abrami, P. C. (1990, Fall). The dimensionality of ratings and their use in personnel decisions. New directions in teaching and learning, 43 (Student ratings of instruction: Issues for improving practice) pp. 97-111. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
2. Aleamoni, L. M., & Yimer, M. (1973, June). An investigation of the relationship between colleague rating, student rating, research productivity, and academic rank in rating instructional effectiveness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 64(3), 274-277.
3. Association of American Colleges. (1985). The decline and devaluation of the undergraduate degree. In C. F. Conrad & J. G. Haworth (Eds.), Curriculum in transition: Perspectives on the undergraduate degree (pp. 65-94). Needham Heights, MA: Ginn Press.
4. Atkins, M. (1990, Winter). Core curriculum destroyed by bad teaching. Campus, pp. 10-12.
5. Bennett, W. J. (1984). To reclaim a legacy: A report on the humanities in higher education. Washington, DC: National Endowment for the Humanities.
6. Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
7. Centra, J. A. (1983). Research productivity and teaching effectiveness. Research in Higher Education, 18(4), 379-389.
8. Crimmel, H. H. (1984). The myth of the teacher-scholar. Liberal Education, 70(3), 183-198.
9. Feldman, K. A. (1987). Research productivity and scholarly accomplishment of college teachers as related to their instructional effectiveness: A review and exploration. Research in Higher Education, 26(3), 227-298.
10. Flanigan, K. S., Ballinger, P. W., Grant, H. K., Bennett, D., Schiller, M. R., Waller, K. V., Jordan, L., Gierhart, J., Brodnik, M. P., Van Son, L. G., Testat, E. W. (1988). Research productivity profile of allied health faculty. Journal of Allied Health, 17(2), 87-100.
11. Friedrich, R. J., & Michalak, S. J. (1983). Why doesn't research improve teaching? Journal of Higher Education, 54(2), 146-163.
12. Gray, P. J., Froh, R. C., & Diamond, R. M. (1992). A national study of research universities on the balance between research and undergraduate teaching. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University, Center for Instructional Development.
13. Hativa, N., & Raviv, A. (1993). Using a single score for sumniative evaluation by students. Research in Higher Education, 34(5), 625-646.
14. Jalongo, M. R. (1985). Faculty productivity in higher education. The Educational Forum, 49(2), 171-182.
15. Kimball, B. A. (1988). Teaching undergraduates essays from the Lilly Endowment workshop in liberal arts. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.
16. Levy, R. G., & Cooke, D. L. (1990, December). Hang the faculty. Syracuse University Magazine, pp. 35-39.
17. McKeachie, W. J. (1969, Winter). Student ratings of faculty. American Association of University Professors Bulletin, 439-444.
18. Michalak, S. J., & Friedrich, R. J. (1981). Research productivity and teaching effectiveness at a small liberal arts college. The Journal of Higher Education, 6(52), 578-597.
19. Mooney, C. J. (1991, May 8). Professors feel conflict between roles in teaching and research, say students are badly prepared. The Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. A15-A16.
20. Rotten, J. (1990, December). Research productivity, course load, and ratings of instructors. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 71, 1388.
21. Ryan, B. F., Joiner, B. L., & Ryan, T. A. (1985). Minitab handbook (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: PWS-Kent Publishing Company.
22. Schoenfeld, C. (1992, August). Teaching vs. research: What do academics really think? Academic Leader, 5(8), 1.
23. Seldin, P. (1980). Successful faculty evaluation programs. Cruger, NY: Coventry Press.
24. Swanson, E. A., McCloskey, J. C., & Bodensteiner, A. (1991). Publishing opportunities for nurses: A comparison of 92 U.S. journals. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 23(1), 33-38.
25. Sykes, C. J. (1988). Profscam. Washington, DC: Regnery, Gateway.
26. Toch, T. (1990, October 15). A return to teaching? The ascendancy of research over teaching may have peaked. U.S. News & World Report, pp. 107-109.
27. Wakefield-Fischer, M. (1987, May-June). The relationship between professionalization of nursing faculty, leadership styles of deans, and faculty scholarly productivity. Journal of Professional Nursing, 3(3) 155-164.
28. Wilshire, B. (1990). The moral collapse of the university: Professionalism, purity, and alienation. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.