Relationship between band sharing levels of DNA fingerprints and inbreeding coefficients and estimation of true inbreeding in turkey lines

Poultry Science

Volumn 75, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 25-28

  Zhu, J ^a   Nestor, K E ^a   Moritsu, Y ^a,b  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b RAKUNO GAKUEN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Band sharing; Correlation; DNA fingerprinting; Inbreeding coefficient; Turkey

Indexed keywords

DNA;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; DNA FINGERPRINTING; FEMALE; GENETICS; INBREEDING; MALE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; TURKEY (BIRD);

ANIMALS; DNA; DNA FINGERPRINTING; FEMALE; INBREEDING; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TURKEYS;

EID: 0029684761     PISSN: 00325791     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3382/ps.0750025     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bellamy, R, J., C. F. Inglehearn, I. K. Jalili, A. J. Jeffreys, and S. S. Bhattacharya, 1991. Increased band sharing in DNA fingerprints of an inbred human population. Hum. Genet. 87:341-347.
2. Bruford, M. W., O. Hanotte, J. Y. Brookfield, and T. Burke, 1992. Single-locus and multilocus DNA fingerprinting. Pages 225-269 i Molecular Genetic Analysis of Populations: A Practica Approach. A. R. Hoelzel, ed. IRL Press, London, UK.
3. Butler, M. A., A. F Templeton, and B. Read, 1994. DNA fingerprinting Speke's gazelle: a test for genetic distinctness, ana the correlation between relatedness and similarity. Mol. Ecol. 3:355-361.
4. Dunnington, E. A., L. C. Stallard, J. Hillel, and P. B. Siegel, 1994. Genetic diversity among commercial chicken populations estimated from DNA fingerprints. Poultry Sci. 73: 1218-1225.
5. Falconer, D. S., 1982. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longman House, Burnt Mill, Essex, UK.
6. Gilbert, D. A., C. Packer, A. E. Pusey, J. C. Stephens, and S. J. O'Brien, 1991. Analytical DNA fingerprinting in lions: parentage, genetic diversity, and kinship. J. Hered. 82: 378-386.
7. Jeffreys, A. J., 1987. Highly variable minisatellites and DNA fingerprinting. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 15:309-317.
8. Jeffreys, A. J., V. Wilson, and S. L. Thein, 1985a. Hypervariable 'minisatellite' regions in human DNA. Nature 314:67-73.
9. Jeffreys, A. J., V. Wilson, and S. L. Thein, 1985b. Individualspecific 'fingerprints' of human DNA. Nature 314:76-79
10. Kuhnlem, U., D. Zadworny, Y. Dawe, R. W. Fairfull, and J. S. Gavora, 1990. Assessment of inbreeding by DNA fingerprinting: Development of a calibration curve using defined strains of chickens. Genetics 125:161-165.
11. Lynch, M., 1991. Analysis of population genetic structure by DNA fingerprinting. Pages 113-126 in: DNA Fingerprinting: Approaches and Applications. T. Burke, G. Dolf, A. J. Jeffreys, and R. Wolff, ed. Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland.
12. Mannen, H., S. Tsuji, F. Mukai, N. Goto, and S. Ohtagaki, 1993. Genetic similarity using DNA fingerprinting in cattle to determine relationship coefficient. J. Hered. 84:166-169.
13. McCartney, M. G., 1964. A randombred control population of turkeys. Poultry Sci. 43:739-744.
14. Nestor, K. E., 1977a. Genetics of growth and reproduction in the turkey. 5. Selection for increase body weight alone and in combination with increased egg production. Poultry Sci. 56:337-347.
15. Nestor, K. E., 1977b. The use of paired mating system for the maintenance of experimental populations of turkeys. Poultry Sci. 56:60-65.
16. Nestor, K. E., 1980. Genetics of growth and reproduction in the turkey. 8. Influence of a management change on response to selection for increased egg production. Poultry Sci. 59: 1961-1969.
17. Nestor, K. E., W. L. Bacon, Y. M. Saif, and P. A. Renner, 1985. The influence of genetic increase in shank width on body weight, walking ability, and reproduction of turkeys. Poultry Sci. 64:2248-2255.
18. Nestor, K. E., M. G. McCartney, and N. Bachev, 1969. Relative contributions of genetics and environment to turkey improvement. Poultry Sci. 48:1944-1949.
19. Noble, D. O., D. A. Emmerson, and K. E. Nestor, 1995. Stability of three randombred turkey lines. Poultry Sci. 74: 1074-1078.
20. Ohno, S., and T. Yomo, 1991. The grammatical rule for all DNA: Junk and coding. Electrophoresis 12:103-108.
21. Reeve, H. K., D. F. Westneat, W. A. Noon, P. W. Sherman, and C. F. Aquadro, 1990. DNA "fingerprinting" reveals high levels of inbreeding in colonies of the eusocial naked mole-rat. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:2496-2500.
22. SAS Institute, 1988. SAS® User's Guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
23. Wetton, J. H., R. E. Carter, D. T. Parkin, and D. Walters, 1987. Demographic study of a wild house sparrow population by DNA fingerprinting. Nature 327:147-152.
24. Zar, J. H., 1984. Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
25. Zhu, J., K. E. Nestor, R. A. Patterson, D. J. Jackwood, and D. A. Emmerson, 1996. Evaluation of generic diversity in turkey lines based on band sharing of deoxyribonucleic acid fingerprints through computer analysis. Poultry Sci. 75:(in press).