Report from efficacy subgroup MR methodology workshop

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 1-3

  Black, William C ^a,b   Beam, Craig A ^c   Camaratta, Joseph ^d   Hanley, James ^e   Malenka, David ^a   Sugarman, Mitchell ^f   Thornbury, John R ^g   Wagner, Robert F ^h  

^a DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCK MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b DARTMOUTH MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

^d SIEMENS CORPORATE RESEARCH   (United States)

^e MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^f KAISER PERMANENTE MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^h CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision analysis; Diagnostic accuracy; Effectiveness outcome; Efficacy; Technology assessment

Indexed keywords

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DECISION TREE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; REVIEW;

DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; DECISION TREES; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS;

EID: 0029683080     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1880060102     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Fryback DG, Thornbury JR. The efficacy of diagnostic imaging. Med Decis Making 1991; 11:88-94.
2. Pauker SG, Kassirer JP. The threshhold approach to clinical decision making. N Engl J Med 1980; 302:1109-1117.
3. Phelps CE, Mushlin AI. Focusing technology assessment using medical decision theory. Med Decis Making 1988; 8:279-289.
4. Mooney C, Mushlin AI, Phelps CE. Targeting assessments of magnetic resonance imaging in suspected multiple sclerosis. Med Decis Making 1990; 10:77-94.
5. Feinstein AR. Diagnostic and spectral markers. In: Clinical epidemiology: the architecture of clinical research. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co., 1985; 614-618.
6. Black WC, Dwyer AJ. Local versus global measures of accuracy: an important distinction for diagnostic imaging. Med Decis Making 1990; 10:266-273.
7. Metz CE, Wagner RF, Doi K, et al. Toward consensus on quantitative assessment of medical imaging systems. Med Phys, in press.
8. McNeil BJ, Keeler E, Adelstein SJ. Primer on certain elements of medical decision making. N Engl J Med 1975; 293:211-215.
9. Metz CE. Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nuc Med 1978; 8:283-298.
10. Begg CB, McNeil BJ. Assessment of radiologic tests: control of bias and other design considerations. Radiology 1988; 167:565-569.
11. Black WC, Welch HG. Advances in diagnostic imaging and overestimations of disease prevalence and the benefits of therapy. N Engl J Med 1993; 328:1237-1243.
12. Beck JR, Pauker SG. The Markov process in medical prognosis. Med Decis Making 1983; 3:419-458.
13. Feinstein AR, Sosin DM, Wells CK. The Will Rogers phenomenon: Stage migration and new diagnostic techniques as a source of misleading statistics for survival in cancer. N Engl J Med 1985; 12:1604-1608.