Contextual Dependencies during Perceptual-motor Skill Acquisition: Gone but Not Forgotten!

Memory

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 91-108

  Wright, David L ^a   Shea, Charles H ^a   Li, Yuhua ^a   Whitacre, Chad ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; HUMAN; LONG TERM MEMORY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; TIME; UNITED STATES;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CUES; HUMANS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; RETENTION (PSYCHOLOGY); TEXAS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0029682464     PISSN: 09658211     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/741940665     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Balsam, P.D. (1985). The functions of context in learning and performance. In P.D. Balsam & A. Tomie (Eds.), Context and learning (pp. 1-21). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
2. Bjork, R.A., & Richardson-Klavehn, A. (1989). On the puzzling relationship between environmental context and human memory. In C. Izawa (Ed.), Current issues in cognitive processes (pp. 313-344). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
3. Fisher, R.P., Geiselman, R.E., Holland, H.L., & MacKinnon, D.P. (1984). Hypnotic and cognitive interviews to enhance the memory of eyewitnesses to crime. International Journal of Investigative and Forensic Hypnosis, 7, 28-31.
4. Gooden, D.R., & Baddeley, A.D. (1975). Context-dependent memory in two natural environments: On land and underwater. British Journal of Psychology, 66, 325-332.
5. Gordon, W.C. (1981). Mechanisms of cue-induced retention enhancement. In N.E. Spear & R.R. Miller (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms (pp. 319-339). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
6. Lee, T.D., & Hirota, T.T. (1980). Encoding specificity principle in motor short-term memory for movement extent. Journal of Motor Behavior, 12, 63-67.
7. Lee, T.D., & Magill, R.A. (1985). On the nature of movement representation in memory. British Journal of Psychology, 76, 175-182.
8. Miller, R.R., & Springer, A.D. (1974) Implcations of recovery from experimental amnesia. Psychological Review, 81, 470-473.
9. Newell, K.M. (1976). Motor learning without knowledge of results through the development of a response recognition mechanism. Journal of Motor Behavior, 8, 209-217.
10. Perkins, C.C., & Weyant, R.G. (1958). The interval between training and test trials as a determiner of the slope of generalization gradients. Journal of Comparative Physiological Psychology, 51, 596-600.
11. Proteau, L. (1992). On the specificity of learning and the role of visual information for movement control. In L. Proteau & D. Elliott (Eds.), Vision and Motor Control (pp. 67-103). North Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers.
12. Proteau, L., Marteniuk, R.G., & Lévesque, L. (1992). A sensorimotor basis for motor learning: Evidence indicating specificity of practice. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44A, 557-575.
13. Reed, H.J. (1931). The influence of a change in condition upon the amount recalled. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14, 632-649.
14. Riccio, D.C., Richardson, R., & Ebner, D.L. (1984). Memory retrieval deficits based upon altered contextual cues: A paradox. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 152-165.
15. Richardson, R., Riccio, D.C., Guanowsky, V., & Okonkwo, A.E. (1983). Disruptive effects of context shifts diminish as a function of the retention interval. Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association. Chicago.
16. Schmidt, R.A., Young, D.E., Swinnen, S., & Shapiro, D.C. (1989). Summary knowledge of results for skill acquisition: Support for the guidance hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 352-359.
17. Smith, S., & Guthrie, E.R. (1924). General psychology in terms of behavior. New York: Appleton- Century.
18. Smith, S.M. (1979). Remembering in and out of context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 460-471.
19. Smith, S.M. (1984). A comparison of two techniques for reducing context-dependent forgetting. Memory & Cognition, 12, 477-482.
20. Smith, S.M. (1985). Background music and context-dependent memory. American Journal of Psychology, 98, 591-603.
21. Smith, S.M. (1988). Environmental context-dependent memory. In G.M. Davies & D.M. Thomson (Eds.), Memory in context: Context in memory (pp. 13-34). London: Wiley.
22. Smith, S.M., Glenberg, A.M., & Bjork, R.A. (1978). Environmental context and human memory. Memory and Cognition, 6, 342-353.
23. Swinnen, S., Schmidt, R.A., Nicholson, D.E., & Shapiro, D.C. (1990). Information feedback for skill acquisition: Instantaneous knowledge of results degrades learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 706-716.
24. Thomas, D.R. (1991). Context as a retrieval cue in pigeon long-term memory. In W.C. Abraham, M.C. Corballis, & K.G. White (Eds.), Memory mechanisms: A tribute to G.V. Goddard (pp. 329-352). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
25. Tulving, E., & Thomson, D.M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352-373.
26. Winstein, C.J., & Schmidt, R.A. (1990). Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 677-691.
27. Wright, D.L., & Shea, C.H. (1991). Contextual dependencies in motor skills. Memory and Cognition, 19, 361-370.
28. Wright, D.L., & Shea, C.H. (1993). Cognition and motor skill acquisition: Contextual dependencies. In C. Reynolds (Ed.), Advances in cognitive assessment: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 89-106). New York: Plenum.
29. Zelaznik, H.N., Shapiro, D.C., & Newell, K.M. (1978). On the structure of motor recognition memory. Journal of Motor Behavior, 10, 313-323.