Computer Versus Lecture: Strategies for Teaching Fetal Monitoring

Journal of Perinatology

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 15-19

  Murray, Michaile L ^a,b,c   Higgins, Patricia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FETUS MONITORING; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NURSING EDUCATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REVIEW; SPECTACLES; TEACHING; VISION;

AUDIOVISUAL AIDS; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; EDUCATION, NURSING; EYEGLASSES; FETAL MONITORING; HUMANS; VISION;

EID: 0029678149     PISSN: 07438346     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Eganhouse DJ. Electronic fetal monitoring education and quality assurance. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 1991;20:16-22.
2. Fetal monitoring problems during labor associated with most serious OB claims. Clinical Engineering Information Service 1984;8:70-2.
3. General Accounting Office. Medical malpractice characteristics of claims closed in 1984. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office, 1987 (GAO/HRD-87-55).
4. Grady MF. Why are people negligent? Technology, nondurable precautions and the medical malpractice explosion. Northwest University Law Rev 1988;82:293-334.
5. Nocon JJ, Coolman DA. Perinatal medicine: risks and prevention. J Reprod Med 1987;32:83-90.
6. Wachsman HF. Obstetrical malpractice or how not to get sued. Conn Med 1986;50:33-6.
7. FM tutor: CAI to build fetal monitoring skills. Nursing Educators Microworld 1987;1:5.
8. Kinnick VG. A national survey about fetal monitoring skills acquired by nursing students in baccalaureate programs. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 1989;18:57-8.
9. Kinnick VG. Learning fetal monitoring under three conditions of concept teaching [Doctoral dissertation]. Boulder, Colorado: University of Colorado, 1989.
10. Murray ML. A comparison of fetal monitoring concept learning from a learner-controlled versus teacher-controlled instructional strategy [Doctoral dissertation]. Albuquerque, New Mexico: The University of New Mexico, 1992.
11. Reigeluth CM. Meaningfulness and instruction: relating what is being learned to whar a student knows. Instr Technol 1983;24:20-6.
12. Traband MF, Dunn TG. Differences in clinical simulation performance: a role for advice-strategies? Respir Care 1988;33:779-85.
13. Felton BB. Planning and implementing computer learning in a department of nursing. Nurs Health Care 1984;5:549-53.
14. Warner S, Tenney JW. Strategies for teaching nursing research: a test of computet-assisted instruction in teaching nursing research. West J Nurs Res 1985;7:132-42.
15. Chang BL. Computer-aided instruction in nursing education. In: Werley HH, et al., eds. Annual review of nursing research. Vol. 4. New York: Springer, 1986:217-33.
16. Jelovsek KJ, Catanzarite VA, Price RD, et al. Application of teaching and learning principles to computer-aided instruction. MD Comput 1989;6: 267-73.
17. Thomas BS. Instructional computing in American nursing programs. Int J Nurs Stud 1986;23:221-9.
18. Merrill MD. Learner control in computer based learning. Comput Educ 1980;4:77-95.
19. Allen GW. Learner control of review in computer-assisted instruction within a military training environment. Dissertation Abstracts International 1989;50:3457-A. (University Microfilms no 90-09-852).
20. Kulik J, Kulik C, Cohen P. Effectiveness of computer-based college teaching: a meta-analysis of findings. Rev Educ Res 1980;50:524-44.
21. Reynolds A, Pontious S. CAI enhances the medication dosage calculation competency of nursing students. Comput Nurs 1986;4:158-65.
22. Beebe SA. The role of nonverbal communication in education: research and theoretical perspectives. Coral Gables, Florida: Department of Communication, University of Miami, 1980 (ERIC Document Reproduction Service no ED 196 062).
23. Rosenshine B, Furst N. Research on teacher performance criteria. In: Smith BO, ed. Research in teacher education. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1971:37-72.
24. Frederiksen N. Implications of cognitive theory for instruction in problem solving. Rev Educ Res 1984;54:363-407.
25. Ball J, Byrnes FC, eds. Research, principles, and practices in visual communication. Washington, D.C.: Association for Educational Communication and Technology, 1960.
26. Hmelo CE. Computer-assisted instruction in health professions education: a review of the published literature. J Educational Technology Systems 1989-1990; 18:83-101.
27. Neil RM. Effects of computer-assisted instruction on nursing student learning and attitude. J Nurs Educ 1985;24:72, 74-5.
28. Clark RE. Reconsidering research on learning from media. Rev Educ Res 1983;53:445-59.
29. Williams CM, Debes JL III, eds. Proceedings for the first national conference on visual literacy. New York: Pitman Publishing, 1970.
30. Rembold KL, Yussen SR. Interaction of knowledge, learning, and development (Program Report 86-8). Madison, Wisconsin: Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin, 1986 (ERIC Document Reproduction Service no ED 275 768).
31. Verbeek HA. Self-instruction through patient simulation by computer. Med Educ 1987;21:10-4.
32. Tennyson RD, Rasch M. Linking cognitive learning theory to instructional prescriptions. Instr Sci 1988;17:369-85.
33. Peterson NS, Jungck JR, Sharpe DM, et al. A design approach to science: learning via the construction of meaning. Machine-Mediated Learning 1987;2:111-27.
34. Reigeluth CM, Schwartz E. An instructional theory for the design of computer-based simulations. J Computer-Based Instruction 1989;16:1-10.