Experiment with simulation models in water-resources negotiations

Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management

Volumn 122, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 64-70

  Reitsma, René ^a   Zigurs, Ilze ^b   Lewis, Clayton ^a   Wilson, Vance ^c   Sloane, Anthony ^d  

^a UCB 450   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^c CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE; AVAILABILITY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FLOOD CONTROL; HYDROELECTRIC POWER; PUBLIC POLICY; RESERVOIRS (WATER); SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEM; NEGOTIATORS; STAKEHOLDERS; WATER RESOURCE NEGOTIATIONS; WHAT IF ANALYSIS;

WATER RESOURCES;

ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECT; MODELING; RESERVOIR; WATER RESOURCE;

MODELLING APPROACH; RESOURCES NEGOTIATION; SIMULATION MODEL; WATER RESOURCES;

EID: 0029677719     PISSN: 07339496     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1996)122:1(64)     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Andrews, C. J. (1991). "Consensus on a shoestring: the efficacy of packaged models in joint fact-finding." Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. on Comp. in Urban Plng. and Mgmt., R. E. Klosterman, ed., Inst. for Comp.-Aided Ping., Univ. of Akron, Ohio.
2. Carnevale, P. J. D., and Isen, A. M. (1986). "The influence of positive affect and visual access on the discovery of integrative solutions in bilateral negotiation." Org. Behavior and Human Decision Processes 37, 1-13.
3. Colorado Department of Natural Resources. (1994). "CRDSS Update, Colorado River Decision Support System Development News." Colorado Water Conservation Board, Div. of Water Resour., Denver, Colo.
4. Dames & Moore, and CADSWES. (1993). Feasibility study report for a Colorado River decision support system. Colo. Dept. of Natural Resour., Denver, Colo.
5. Dennis, A. R., and Gallupe, R. B. (1993). "A history of group support systems empirical research: lessons learned and future directions." Group support systems: new perspectives, L. M. Jessup and J. S. Valacich, eds., Macmillan Publishing Co., New York, N.Y., 59-77.
6. Dickson, G. W., Lee, J. E., Robinson, L., and Heath, R. (1989). "Observations on GDSS interaction: chauffeured, facilitated, and user-driven systems." Proc., 22nd Annu. Hawaii Int. Conf. on Sys. Sci., R. Blanning and D. King, eds., Vol. III, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, Calif., 337-343.
7. Fulp, T., et al. (1994). Decision support for water resources management in the Colorado River. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Boulder City, Nev.
8. Gordon, M. E., Slade, L. A., and Schmitt, N. (1987). "Student guinea pigs: porcine predictors and particularistic phenomena." Acad. of Mgmt. Rev., 12(1), 160-163.
9. Gouran, D. S., Brown, C., and Henry, D. R. (1978). "Behavioral correlates of perceptions of quality in decision-making discussion." Communication monographs. 45, 51-63.
10. Green, S. G., and Taber, T. D. (1980). "The effects of three social decision schemes on decision group process." Org. Behavior and Human Perf., 25, 97-106.
11. Greenberg, J. (1987). "The college sophomore as guinea pig: setting the record straight." Acad. of Mgmt. Rev., 12(1), 157-159.
12. Greenhalgh, L., Neslin, S. A., and Gilkey, R. W. (1985). "The effects of negotiator preferences, situational power, and negotiator personality on outcomes of business negotiations." Acad. of Mgmt. J., 28(1), 9-33.
13. Johnson, L. E. (1990). "Computer-aided planning for multiple-purpose reservoir operations policies." AWRA Water Resour. Bull., 26(2), 299-311.
14. Jones, E. J., and Yaffee, S. L. (1992). The Two Forks Project: Discussion Draft. School of Natural Resour., Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
15. Kraemer, K. L. (1985). "Modeling as negotiating: the political dynamics of computer models in policy making." Adv. in Information Processing in Orgs. 2, 275-307.
16. Luecke, D. F. (1990). "Water resources: controversy over Two Forks Dam." Envir., 32, 42-45.
17. McGrath, J., Martin, J., and Kulka, R. (1982). Judgment Calls in Research. Sage Publications, Inc., Beverly Hills, Calif.
18. Palmer, R. N., Keyes, A. M., and Fisher, S. (1993). "Empowering stakeholders through simulation in water resources planning." Water Management in the '90s; a Time for Innovation, K. Hon, ed., ASCE, New York, N.Y., 451-454.
19. Pinsonneault, A., and Kraemer, K. (1989). "The impact of technological support on groups: an assessment of the empirical research." Decision Support Sys., 5, 197-216.
20. Pruitt, D. G., and Carnevale, P. J. D. (1982). "The development of integrative agreements." Cooperation and Helping Behavior: Theories and Research, V. Derlega and J. Grizelak, eds., Academic Press, Inc., New York, N.Y.
21. Randall, D., Sheer, D. P., and Meyer, H. (1988). "Computer-aided negotiation of water resources issues in California's central valley project." Computerized Decision Support Systems for Water Managers, J. W. Labadie, L. E. Brazil, I. Corfu, and L. E. Johnson, eds., ASCE, New York, N.Y.
22. Reitsma, R. F., Sautins, A. M., and Wehrend, S. C. (1994). "Construction kit for river basin models." J. Comp. in Civ. Engrg., 8(3), 378-384.
23. Session Laws of Colorado. (1993). State of Colorado. Chapter 254, Section 3. Denver, Colo.
24. Walton, R. E., and McKersie, R. B. (1965). A behavioral theory of labor negotiations. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, N.Y.