Effects of Cotton Fiber Blending and Processing on HVI Measurements—Part I

Textile Research Journal

Volumn 66, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 349-357

  Fryer, L F ^a   Rust, Jon P ^a   Lord, P R ^b  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Raltex Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BLENDING; COTTON FIBRES; FIBRE BUNDLES; FIBRE ORIENTATION; FIBRE PROPERTIES; HVI; TESTING;

EID: 0029675087     PISSN: 00405175     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/004051759606600601     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Adams, D.L., Why We Need a Standard Method for Strength Testing, and What It Will Take to Get One, in “Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conferences,” National Cotton Council, 1994, pp. 1437-1441.
2. “The American Cotton Handbook,” vol. 1, Dame S. Hamby, Ed., Interscience Publishers, NY, 1965, pp. 132-206.
3. Cui, X., Tensile Properties of Bundles and Their Constituent Fibers—An Application to HVI Cotton Testing, Doctoral dissertation, North Carolina State University, 1994.
4. Duckett, K.E., Zhou, Z., Krowicki, R.S., and Sasser, P.E., Cotton Fiber Fineness Distributions and Their Effects on the Tenacities of Randomly Sampled HVI Tapered Beards: Linear Density Effects, Textile Res. J. 63, 737-744 (1993).
5. Frank, Harry, and Althoen, Steven C., “Statistics: Concepts and Applications,” Cambridge University Press, NY, 1994, pp. 423, 473.
6. Fryer, L.F., Lord, P.R., and Rust, J.P., Influence of Cotton Variables on Subsequent Process Performance, in “Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conferences,” National Cotton Council, 1994, pp. 1639-1640.
7. Harig, H., and Bäumer, R., A Reference Method to Measure Bundle Strength—Problems with Its Development, in “Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conferences,” National Cotton Council, 1994, pp. 1385-1386.
8. Ishtiaque, S.M., Longitudinal Fiber Distribution in Relation to Rotor Spun Yarn Properties, Textile Res. J. 59, 696-699 (1989).
9. Lord, P.R., and Rust, J.P., Blending as a Systemic Problem, in “Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conferences,” National Cotton Council, 1994, pp. 1631-1635.
10. Lord, P.R., Blending Is More Than a Good Bale Laydown, in “Proc. of the Cotton Incorporated 7th Engineered Fiber Selection System Research Forum,” November 1994, Raleigh, NC.
11. Montalvo, J.G., Jr., and Vinyard, B.T., A Critical Evaluation of the Relationships Between Arealometer Instrument Values and Cotton Fiber Perimeter, Textile Res. J. 63, 267-282 (1993).
12. Morlier, O.W., Orr, R.S., and Grant, J.N., The Relation of Length to Other Physical Properties of Cotton Fibers, Textile Res. J. 21, 6-13 (1951).
13. Morton, W.E., and Hearle, J.W.S., “Physical Properties of Textile Fibers,” The Textile Institute, Butterworth and Company, London, 1962, pp. 333-375.
14. Nikolic, M. and Bukosek, Influence of Opening Force During OE Spinning on Fiber Geometry, Tixtile Res. J. 65, 652-659 (1995).
15. Riley, R.R., and Chu, Y.T., Short Fiber Measurement From HVI, in “Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conferences,” National Cotton Council, 1994, pp. 1389-1392.
16. Sasser, P.E., Shofner, F.M., Chu, Y.T., Shofner, C.K., and Townes, M.G., Interpretations of Single Fiber, Bundle, and Yarn Tenacity Data, Textile Res. J. 61, 681-690(1991).
17. Taylor, R.A., Cotton Tenacity Measurements with High Speed Instruments, Textile Res. J. 56, 92-101 (1986).
18. Taylor, R.A., Linking the FMT to HVI Strength Measurements, in “Proc. Beltwide Cotton Production Conferences,” National Cotton Council, 1991, pp. 864-869.