Influence of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist DL-2-amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid on auditory filial imprinting in the domestic chick

Neurobiology of Learning and Memory

Volumn 65, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 177-188

  Bock, Jörg ^a   Wolf, Annette ^b   Braun, Katharina ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE FOR NEUROBIOLOGY   (Germany)

^b DARMSTADT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

2 AMINO 5 PHOSPHONOVALERIC ACID; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE; N METHYL DEXTRO ASPARTIC ACID RECEPTOR;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; AUTORADIOGRAPHY; CHICKEN; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG EFFECT; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; FOREBRAIN; INTRACEREBRAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; LEARNING; MALE; NONHUMAN; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TELENCEPHALON;

2-AMINO-5-PHOSPHONOVALERATE; ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMALS; AUTORADIOGRAPHY; CHICKENS; IMPRINTING (PSYCHOLOGY); LEARNING; PROSENCEPHALON; RECEPTORS, N-METHYL-D-ASPARTATE;

EID: 0029670124     PISSN: 10747427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/nlme.1996.0019     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Artola, A., & Singer, W. (1987). Long-term potentiation and NMDA receptors in rat visual cortex. Nature, 330, 649-652.
2. Bateson, P. P. G. (1966). The characteristics and context of imprinting. Biological Reviews, 41, 177-220.
3. Bolhuis, J. J., & Reid, I. C. (1992). Effects of intraventicular infusion of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist AP5 on spatial memory of rats in a radial arm maze. Behavioural Brain Research, 47, 151-157.
4. Brauth, S. E., Ferguson, J. L., & Kitt, C. A. (1978). Prosencephalic pathways related to the paleostriatum of the pigeon (Columba livia). Brain Research, 147, 205-221.
5. Burchuladze, R., & Rose, S. P. R. (1992). Memory formation in day-old chicks requires NMDA but not non-NMDA glutamate receptors. European Journal of Neuroscience, 4, 533-538.
6. Collingridge, G. L., Kehl, S. J., & McLennan, H. (1983). Excitatory amino acids in synaptic transmission in the Schaffer-commisural pathway of the rat hippocampus. Journal of Physiology, 334, 33-46.
7. Davis, S., Butcher, S. P., & Morris, R. G. M. (1992). The NMDA receptor antagonist D-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoate (D-AP5) impairs spatial learning and LTP in vivo at intracerebral concentrations comparable to those that block LTP in vitro. Journal of Neuroscience, 12, 21-34.
8. DeCasper, A. J., & Fifer, W. P. (1980). Of human bonding: Newborns prefer their mother's voices. Science, 208, 1174-1176.
9. Fischer, G. J. (1972). Sound stimuli and following in a domestic fowl: Frequency, Rate and duration. Journal of Comparative Physiology and Psychology, 81, 183-190.
10. Gonzales-Lima, F. (1992). Brain imaging of iuditory fearning functions in rats: Studies with fluorodeoxyglucose autoradiography and cytochrome oxidase histochemistry. In F. Gonzales-Lima, Th. Finkenstädt, & H. Scheich (Eds.), Advances in metabolic mapping techniques for brain imaging of behavioral and learning functions (pp. 39-109). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
11. Gray, P. H. (1958). Theory and evidence of imprinting in human infants. The Journal of Physiology, 46, 155-166.
12. Henley, J. M., Moratallo, R., Hunt, S. P., & Barnard, E. A. (1989). Localization and quantitative autoradiography of glutamatergic ligand binding sites in chick brain. European Journal of Neuroscience, 1, 516-523.
13. Hess, E. (1973). Imprinting. New York: Van Nostrand.
14. Horn, G. (1985). Memory, imprinting and the brain. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
15. Immelmann, K., & Grossmann, K. E. (1981). Phasen kindlicher Entwicklung. In H. Wendt & N. Loacker (Eds.), Kindlers enzyklopädie der mensch. Band IV. Die Sonderstellung des menschen (pp. 130-188). Zürich: Kindler Verlag AG.
16. Kuenzel, W., J., & Masson, M. (1988). A stereotaxic atlas of the brain of the chick (Gallus domesticus). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.
17. Lorenz, K. (1935). Der Kumpan in der Umwelt des Vogels. Journal of Ornithology, 83, 137-213 and 289-413.
18. Maier, V., & Scheich, H. (1983). Acoustic imprinting leads to differential 2-deoxyglucose uptake in the chick forebrain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 80, 3860-3864.
19. Mata, M., Fink, D. J., Gainer, H., Smith C. B., Davidsen, L., Savaki, H., Schwartz, W. J., & Sokoloff, L. (1980). Activity-dependent energy metabolism in rat posterior pituitary primarily reflects sodium pump activity. Journal of Neurochemistry, 34, 213-215.
20. McCabe, B. J., & Horn, G. (1988). Learning and memory: Regional changes in N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in the chick brain after imprinting. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 85, 2849-2853.
21. McCabe, B. J., Davey, J. E., & Horn, G. (1992). Impairment of learning by localized injection of an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist into the hyperstriatum ventrale of the domestic chick. Behavioral Neuroscience, 106, 947-953.
22. Mitsacos, A., Dermon, C. R., Stassi, K., & Kouvelas, E. D. (1990). Localization of L-glutamate binding sites in chick brain by quantitative autradiography. Brain Research, 513, 348-352.
23. Mondadori, C., & Weiskrantz, L. (1993) NMDA receptor blockers facilitate and impair learning via different mechanisms. Behavioral and Neural Biology, 60, 205-210.
24. Morris, R. G. M. (1989). Synaptic plasticity and learning: Selective impairment of learning in rats and blockade of long-term potentiation in vivo by the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist AP5. Journal of Neuroscience, 9, 3040-3057.
25. Morris, R. G. M., Anderson, E., Lynch, G. S., & Baudry, M. (1986). Selective impairment of learning and blockade of long-term potentiation by an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist, AP5. Nature, 319, 774-776.
26. Muller, P., & Martin, L. (1984). The 2-deoxyglucose uptake method as a first screen for neurotoxic compounds. Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, 62, 998-1009.
27. Nixdorf, B. E., & Bischof, H.-J. (1982). Afferent connections of the ectostriatum and visual wulst in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata castanotis Gould) - An HRP study. Brain Research, 248, 9-17.
28. Olney, J. W., Labruyere, J., Wang, G., Wozniak, D. F., Price, M. T., & Sesma, M. A. (1991). NMDA Antagonist Neurotoxicity: Mechanism and Prevention. Science, 254, 1515-1518.
29. Rose, S. P. R. (1991). How chicks make memories: the cellular cascade from c-fos to dendritic remodelling. Trends in Neuroscience, 14, 390-397.
30. Scheich, H. (1987). Neural correlates of auditory filial imprinting. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 161, 605-619.
31. Scheich, H., Wallhäußer-Franke, E., & Braun, K. (1992). Does synaptic selection explain auditory imprinting? In L. R. Squire, N. M. Weinberger, G. Lynch, and J. L. McGaugh (Eds.), Memory: Organisation and locus of change (pp. 114-159). Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
32. 14C]deoxyglucose method for the measurement of local cerebral glucose utilization: Theory, procedure and normal values in the conscious and anesthetized albino rat. Journal of Neurochemistry, 28, 897-916.
33. Steele, R. J., & Stewart, M. G. (1993). 7-chlorokynurenate, an antagonist of the glycine binding site on the NMDA receptor, inhibits memory formation in day old chicks (Gallus domesticus). Behavioral and Neural Biology, 60, 89-92.
34. Wallhäußer, E., & Scheich, H. (1987). Auditory imprinting leads to differential 2-deoxyglucose uptake and dendritic spine loss in the chick rostral forebrain. Developmental Brain Research, 31, 29-44.
35. Wang, X., Babinsky, R., & Scheich, H. (1994). Synaptic potentiation and depression in slices of mediorostral neostriatum-hyperstriatum complex, an auditory imprinting-relevant area in chick forebrain. Neuroscience, 3, 689-699.
36. Zeier, H., & Karten, H. J. (1971). The archistriatum of the pigeon: Organization of afferent and efferent connections. Brain Research, 31, 313-326.