Female choice for complex song in the European starling: A field experiment

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 65-71

  Mountjoy, D James ^a,b   Lemon, Robert E ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

Indicator models; Sexual selection; Song repertoires; Sturnus vulgaris; Territory quality

Indexed keywords

STURNUS VULGARIS; STURNIDAE;

MATE CHOICE; SEXUAL SELECTION; SONG; STARLING;

EID: 0029667644     PISSN: 03405443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s002650050218     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Adret-Hausberger M, Güttinger H-R, Merkel FW (1990) Individual life history and song repertoire changes in a colony of starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) Ethology 84: 265-280
2. Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton
3. Baker MC (1986) Sexual selection and size of repertoire in song-birds. In: Ouellet H (ed) Acta XIX Congressus Internationalis Orinologici, vol. 1. National Museum of Natural Sciences, Ottawa, pp 1358-1365
4. Borgia G (1987) A critical review of sexual selection models. In: Bradbury JW, Andersson MB (eds) Sexual selection: testing the alternatives. Wiley, Chichester, pp 55-66
5. Canady RA, Kroodsma DE, Nottebohm F (1984) Population differences in complexity of a learned skill are correlated with the brain space involved. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81: 6232-6234
6. Catchpole CK (1980) Sexual selection and the evolution of complex songs among European warblers of the genus Acrocephalus. Behaviour 74: 149-166
7. Catchpole CK (1982) The evolution of bird sound in relation to mating and spacing behaviour. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH (eds) Acoustic communication in birds, vol. 1. Academic Press, London, pp 297-319
8. Catchpole CK (1986) Song repertoires and reproductive success in the great reed warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19: 439-445
9. Curio E (1983) Why do young birds reproduce less well? Ibis 125: 400-404
10. Cuthill I, Hindmarsh AM (1985) Increase in starling song activity with removal of mate. Anim Behav 33: 326-328
11. Darwin C (1871) The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. John Murray, London
12. Desrochers A (1992) Age and foraging success in European black-birds: variation between and within individuals. Anim Behav 43: 885-894
13. DeVoogd TJ, Krebs JR, Healy SD, Purvis A (1993) Relations between song repertoire size and the volume of brain nuclei related to song: comparative evolutionary analyses amongst oscine birds. Proc R Soc Lond B 254: 75-82
14. Dowsett-Lemaire F (1979) The imitative range of the marsh warbler Acrocephalus palustris, with special reference to imitations of African birds. Ibis 121: 453-468
15. Eens M, Pinxten R (1990) Extra-pair courtship in the starling Sturnus vulgaris. Ibis 132: 618-619
16. Eens M, Pinxten R, Verheyen RF (1989) Temporal and sequential organisation of song bouts in the European starling. Ardea 77: 75-86
17. Eens M, Pinxten R, Verheyen RF (1990) On the function of singing and wing-waving in the European starling Sturnus vulgaris. Bird Study 37: 48-52
18. Eens M, Pinxten R, Verheyen RF (1991) Male song as a cue for mate choice in the European starling. Behaviour 116: 210-238
19. Eens M, Pinxten R, Verheyen RF (1992a) No overlap in song repertoire size between yearling and older European starlings, Sturnus vulgaris. Ibis 134: 72-76
20. Eens M, Pinxten R, Verheyen RF (1992b) Song learning in captive European starlings, Sturnus vulgaris. Anim Behav 44: 1131-1143
21. Eens M, Pinxten R, Verheyen RF (1993) Function of the song and song repertoire in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris): an aviary experiment. Behaviour 125: 51-66
22. Feare CJ (1984) The starling. Oxford University Press, Oxford
23. Fisher RA (1958) The genetical theory of natural selection. Dover, New York
24. Harvey PH, Bradbury JW (1991) Sexual selection. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology. Blackwell, London, pp 203-233
25. Howard RD (1974) The influence of sexual selection and interspecific competition on mockingbird song (Mimus polyglottes). Evolution 28: 428-438
26. Kirn JR, Glower RP, Kroodsma DE, DeVoogd TJ (1989) Song-related brain regions in the red-winged blackbird are affected by sex and season but not repertoire size. J Neurobiol 20: 139-163
27. Krebs JR, Ashcroft R, Webber MI (1978) Song repertoires and territory defence. Nature 271: 539-542
28. Lande R (1987) Genetic correlations between the sexes in the evolution of sexual dimorphism and mating preferences. In: Bradbury JW, Andersson MB (eds) Sexual selection: testing the alternatives. Wiley, Chichester, pp 83-94
29. Manning JT (1985) Choosy females and correlates of male age. J Theor Biol 116: 349-446
30. McGregor PK, Krebs JR, Perrins CM (1981 ) Song repertoires and lifetime reproductive success in the great tit (Parus major). Am Nat 118: 149-159
31. Mountjoy DJ (1994) Male song and sexual selection in the European starling. PhD thesis, McGill University, Montreal, Canada,
32. Mountjoy DJ, Lemon RE (1991) Song as an attractant for male and female European starlings, and the influence of song complexity on their response. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28: 97-100
33. Mountjoy DJ, Lemon RE (1995) Extended song learning in wild-European starlings. Anim Behav 49: 357-366
34. Nottebohm F (1972) The origins of vocal learning. Am Nat 106: 116-140
35. Nottebohm F, Kasparian S, Pandazis C (1981) Brain space for a learned task. Brain Res 213: 99-109
36. Nottebohm F, Nottebohm ME, Crane L (1986) Developmental and seasonal changes in canary song and their relation to changes in the anatomy of song-control nuclei. Behav Neur Biol 46: 445-471
37. Pyle P, Howell SNG, Yunick RP, DeSante DF (1987) Identification guide to North American passerines. Slate Creek Press, Bolinas
38. Searcy WA (1984) Song repertoire size and female preferences in song sparrows. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 14: 281-286
39. Searcy WA (1992) Song repertoire and mate choice in birds. Am Zool 32: 71-80
40. Searcy WA, Andersson MB (1986) Sexual selection and the cvolution of song. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 17: 507-533
41. Searcy WA, Marier P (1981) A test for responsiveness to song structure and programming in female sparrows. Science 213: 926-928
42. Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871-1971. Aldine, Chicago, pp 136-179
43. Verheyen RF (1980) Breeding strategies of the starling. In: Wright EN, Inglis IR, Feare CJ (eds) Bird problems in agriculture. British Crop Protection Council, Croydon, pp 69-82
44. Wilkinson L (1992) SYSTAT: the system for statistics. SYSTAT, Evanston
45. Yasukawa K (1981) Song repertoires in the red-winged blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus): a test of the Beau Geste hypothesis. Anim Behav 29: 114-125
46. Yasukawa K, Blank JL, Patterson CB (1980) Song repertoires and sexual selection in the red-winged blackbird. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 7: 233-238