Genetic criteria for establishing evolutionarily significant units in Cryan's buckmoth

Conservation Biology

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 85-98

  Legge, John T ^a,c   Roush, Richard ^a,d   Desalle, Rob ^b   Vogler, Alfried P ^b,e   May, Bernie ^a  

^a Cornell University ^*  (United States)

^b DIVISION OF INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY   (United States)

^c Michigan Natural Features Inventory   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^e DEPARTMENT OF LIFE SCIENCES   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CRYAN'S BUCKMOTH; HOST PLANT; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

CANADA, ONTARIO, OTTAWA; USA, NEW YORK;

HEMILEUCA MAIA; LEPIDOPTERA; MENYANTHES TRIFOLIATA; SATURNIIDAE; HEMILEUCA SPP.;

EID: 0029667632     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10010085.x     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Amato, G. D. 1991. Species hybridization and protection of endangered animals. Science 253:250.
2. Avise, J. C., and W. S. Nelson. 1989. Molecular genetic relationships of the extinct Dusky Seaside Sparrow. Science 243:646-648.
3. Avise, J. C. 1989. A role for molecular genetics in the recognition and conservation of endangered species. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 4:279-281.
4. Avise, J. C. 1992. Molecular population structure and the biogeographic history of a regional fauna: a case history with lessons for conservation biology. Oikos 63:62-76.
5. Behnke, R. J. 1993. Status of biodiversity of taxa and nontaxa of salmonid fishes: Contemporary problems of classification and conservation. Pages 43-48 in J. G. Cloud and G. H. Thorgaard, editors. Genetic conservation of salmonid fishes. Plenum Press, New York.
6. Birky, C. W., T. Maruyama, and P. Fuerst. 1983. An approach to population and evolutionary genetic theory for genes in mitochondria and chloroplasts, and some results. Genetics 103:513-527.
7. Bowers, M. D. 1988. Chemistry and coevolution: iridoid glycosides, plants, and herbivorous insects. Pages 133-165 in K. C. Spencer, editor. Chemical mediation of coevolution. Academic Press, San Diego.
8. Britten, H. B., and P. F. Brussard. 1990. Genetic divergence and the Pleistocene history of the alpine butterflies Boloria improba (Nymphalidae) and the endangered Boloria acrocnema (Nymphalidae) in western North America. Canadian Journal of Zoology 70: 539-548.
9. Clary, D. O., and D. R. Wolstenholme. 1985. The mitochondrial DNA molecule of Drosophila yakuba: nucleotide sequence, gene organization, and genetic code. Journal of Molecular Evolution 22:252-271.
10. Collins, M. M., and P. M. Tuskes. 1979. Reproductive isolation in sympatric species of dayflying moths (Hemileuca:Saturniidae). Evolution 33:728-733.
11. Cracraft, J. 1983. Species concept and speciation analysis. Current Ornithology 1:159-187.
12. Crease, T. J., M. Lynch, and K. Spitze. 1990. Hierarchical analysis of population genetic variation in mitochondrial and nuclear genes of Daphnia pulex. Molecular Biology and Evolution 7:444-458.
13. Cryan, J. F., and R. Dirig. 1987. The moths of autumn. Pine Bush Historic Preservation Project, Albany, New York.
14. Davis, J. I., and K. C. Nixon. 1992. Populations, genetic variation, and the delimitation of phylogenetic species. Systematic Biology 41: 421-435.
15. DeSalle, R., A. Templeton, I. Mori, S. Pletscher, and J. S. Johnston. 1987. Temporal and spatial heterogeneity in natural populations of Drosophila mercatorum. Genetics 116:215-223.
16. Dizon, A. E., C. Lockyer, W. F. Perrin, D. P. Demaster, and J. Sisson. 1992. Rethinking the stock concept: a phylogeographic approach. Conservation Biology 6:24-36.
17. Dowling, T. E., W. L. Minckley, M. E. Douglas, P. C. Marsh, and B. D. Demarais. 1992. Response to Wayne, Nowak, and Phillips and Henry: use of molecular characters in conservation biology. Conservation Biology 6:600-603.
18. Erwin, T. L. 1991. An evolutionary basis for conservation strategies. Science 253:750-752.
19. Faeth, S. H. 1992. Do defoliation and subsequent phytochemical responses reduce future herbivory on oak trees? Journal of Chemical Ecology 18:915-925.
20. Ferguson, D. C. 1971. In R. B. Dominick et al., editors. The moths of America north of Mexico, fasc. 20.2, Bombycoiclea (Saturniidae). E. W. Classey Ltd. and R. B. D. Publications, London.
21. Garnery, L., D. Vautrin., J. M. Cornuet, and M. Solignac. 1991. Phylogenetic relationships in the genus Apis inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequence data. Apidologie 22:87-92.
22. Hagen, R. H. 1990. Population structure and host use in hybridizing subspecies of Papilio glaucus (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Evolution 44:1914-1930.
23. Harrison, R. G. 1991. Molecular changes at speciation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 22:281-308.
24. Hillis, D. M. 1987. Molecular versus morphological approaches to systematics. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18:23-42.
25. Leeuw, I. 1974. A further note on the acceptability of an alternate foodplant for Hemileuca maia (Drury) (Saturniidae). Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 28:301.
26. Legge, J. T. 1993. Genetic differentiation of fen-dwelling Hemileuca (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) within the H. maia species group. M.S. thesis. Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
27. Lehmann, E. L. 1975. Nonparametrics: Statistical methods based on ranks. Holden-Day, San Francisco.
28. Liu, H., and A. T. Beckenbach. 1992. Evolution of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase II gene among 10 orders of insects. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 1:41-52.
29. May, B. 1992. Starch gel electrophoresis of allozymes. Pages 1-28 in A. R. Hoelzel, editor. Molecular genetic analysis of populations: a practical approach. IRL Press, Oxford, England.
30. Menken, S. B. 1990. Biochemical systematics of the leaf mining moth family Nepticulidae (Lepidoptera). III. Allozyme variation patterns in the Ectoedemia subbimaculella group. Bijdragen tot de Dierkunde 60:189-197.
31. Metzler, E. H., and V. P. Lucas. 1990. An endangered moth in Ohio, with notes on other species of special concern (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae, Sphingidae, Notodontidae, and Arctiidae). Ohio Journal of Science 90:33-40.
32. Meyer, A., I. D. Kocher, P. Basasibwaki, and A. C. Wilson. 1990. Monophyletic origin of Lake Victoria cichlid fishes suggested by mitochondrial DNA sequences. Nature 347:550-553.
33. Moritz, C. 1994. Applications of mitochondrial DNA analysis in conservation: a critical review. Molecular Ecology 3:401-411.
34. Nei, M. 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89:583-590.
35. Nelson, G. J., and N. I. Platnick. 1981. Systematics and biogeography: cladistics and vicariance. Columbia University Press, New York.
36. Nixon, K. C., and Q. D. Wheeler. 1990. An amplification of the phylogenetic species concept. Cladistics 6:212-223.
37. Peigler, R. S., and S. E. Stone. 1989. Taxonomic and biological notes on the Hemileuca maia group (Saturniidae) with description of a new species from Texas and New Mexico. Journal of the Lepidopterological Society of Japan 40:149-166.
38. Rojas, M. 1992. The species problem and conservation: What are we protecting? Conservation Biology 6:170-178.
39. Ryder, O. A. 1986. Conservation and systematics: The dilemma of subspecies. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 1:9-10.
40. Scalbert, A., and E. Haslam. 1987. Polyphenols of the leaves of Quercus robur. Phytochemistry 26:3191-3196.
41. Scholtens, B. G., and W. H. Wagner, Jr. 1994. Biology of the genus Hemileuca (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) in Michigan. The Great Lakes Entomologist 27:197-207.
42. Scriber, J. M. 1983. Evolution of feeding specialization, physiological efficiency, and host races in selected Papilionidae and Saturniidae. Pages 373-412 in R. F. Denno and M. S. McClure, editors. Variable plants-and herbivores in natural and managed systems. Academic Press, New York.
43. Smith, M. J. 1974. Life history notes on some Hemileuca species (Satumiidae). Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 28:142-145.
44. Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf. 1981. Biometry. 2nd edition. Freeman, San Francisco.
45. Stamp, N. E., and M. D. Bowers. 1986. Growth of the buckmoths Hemileuca lucina and H. maia on their own and each other's host plants. Lepidopterists' Society Journal 40:214-247.
46. Stone, S. E., and M. J. Smith. 1990. Buckmoths (Lepidoptera:Saturniidae:Hemileuca) in relation to southwestern vegetation and foodplants. Desert Plants 10:13-30.
47. Thompson, J. H. 1988. Evolutionary genetics of opposition preference in swallowtail butterflies. Evolution 42:1223-1234.
48. Thorpe, J. P. 1982. The molecular clock hypothesis: biochemical evaluation, genetic differentiation and systematics. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 13:139-168.
49. Tiitto, J. R. 1986. A chemotaxonomic survey of phenolics in leaves of northern Salicaceae species. Phytochemistry 25:663-668.
50. Tuttle, J. In press. The wild silk moths of North America. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.
51. Vogler, A. P., and R. DeSalle. 1993. Phylogeographic patterns in coastal North American tiger beetles, Cicindela dorsalis, inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Evolution 47:1192-1202.
52. Vogler, A. P., and R. DeSalle. 1994. Diagnosing units of conservation management. Conservation Biology 8:354-363.
53. Vogler, A. P., C. B. Knisley, S. B. Glueck, J. M. Hill, and R. DeSalle. 1993. Using molecular and ecological data to diagnose endangered populations of the Puritan tiger beetle, Cicindela puritana. Molecular Ecology 2:375-383.
54. Waples, R. S. 1991. Pacific salmon, Oncorynchus spp., and the definition of a "species" under the Endangered Species Act. Marine Fisheries Review 53:11-22.
55. Wayne, R. K., and S. M. Jenks. 1991. Mitochondria DNA analysis implying extensive hybridization of the endangered red wolf Canis rufus. Nature 351:565-568.