Sources of variation in attitudes and beliefs about federal rangeland management

Journal of Range Management

Volumn 49, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 69-75

  Brunson, Mark W ^a   Steel, Brent S ^b  

^a UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

attitudes; beliefs; environmental values; federal policy; survey

Indexed keywords

PERCEPTION; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; RANGELAND MANAGMENT; URBAN-RURAL DISPARITY;

USA;

EID: 0029667353     PISSN: 0022409X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/4002728     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Ajzen, I. and M. Fishbein. 1980. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
2. Brown, G. and C. Harris. 1992. The USDA Forest Service: toward the new resource management paradigm? Society & Natur. Resour. 5:231-245.
3. Brunson, M.W. and J.J. Kennedy. 1995. Redefining multiple use: agency responses to changing social values. p. 186-195. In: R.L. Knight and S.F. Bates (eds.), A new century for natural resources management. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
4. Brunson, M.W. and B.S. Steel. 1994. National public attitudes toward federal rangeland management. Rangelands 16:77-81.
5. Buttel, F.H. 1987. New directions in environmental sociology. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 13:465-488.
6. Dillman, D.A. 1978. Mail and telephone surveys: the total design method. John Wiley & Sons, N.Y.
7. Dunlap, R.E. 1992. American environmentalism: the US environmental movement. Taylor & Francis, Philadelphia, Penn.
8. Dunlap, R.E. and K.D. Van Liere. 1978. The "new environmental paradigm": a proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. J. Environ. Educ. 9(Summer):10-19.
9. Fortmann, L. and J. Kusel. 1990. New voices, old beliefs: forest environmentalism among new and long-standing rural residents. Rural Sociol. 55:214-232.
10. Graham, H. 1991. Americans report high levels of environmental concern, activity. Gallup Poll Monthly (April):6-12.
11. Heberlein, T.A. 1981. Environmental attitudes. Zeitschrift für Umweltpolitik 4:241-270.
12. Holechek, J.L., R.D. Pieper, and C.H. Herbel. 1989. Range management: principles and practices. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
13. Noe, F.P. and W.E. Hammitt. 1992. Environmental attitudes and the personal relevance of management actions in a park setting. J. Environ. Manage. 35:205-216.
14. Pierce, J.C., N.C. Lovrich Jr., T. Tsurutani, and T. Abe. 1989. Public knowledge and environmental politics in Japan and in the United States. Westview, Boulder, Colo.
15. Rasker, R. 1993. Rural development, conservation, and public policy in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Society & Natur. Resour. 6:109-126.
16. Rokeach, M. 1979. Understanding human values: Individual and societal. Free Press, N.Y.
17. Rudzitis, G. and H.E. Johansen. 1991. How important is wilderness? Results from a United States survey. Environ. Manage. 15:227-233.
18. Shindler, B., P. List, and B.S. Steel. 1993. Managing federal forests: public attitudes in Oregon and nationwide. J.Forest. 91:36-42.
19. Simmons, C.J., B.A. Bickart, and J.G. Lynch Jr. 1993. Capturing and creating public opinion in survey research. J. Consumer Res. 20:316-329.
20. Steel, B.S., P. List and B. Shindler. 1994. Conflicting values about federal forests: a comparison of national and Oregon publics. Society & Natur. Resour. 7:137-153
21. Tetlock, P.E. 1986. A value pluralism model of ideological reasoning. J. Personality & Soc. Psychol. 50:819-827.
22. Tourangeau, R. and K.A. Rasinski. 1988. Cognitive processes underlying context effects in attitude measurement. Psychol. Bull. 103:299-314.