Evidence for upper mantle anisotropy beneath southern Germany from Love and Rayleigh wave dispersion

Geophysical Research Letters

Volumn 23, Issue 10, 1996, Pages 1135-1138

  Friederich, W ^a   Huang, Z X ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

^b INSTITUTE OF GEOPHYSICS   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPY; LOVE WAVE; MANTLE (UPPER); RAYLEIGH WAVE; WAVE DISPERSION;

GERMANY;

ANISOTROPY; DISPERSION (WAVES); EARTHQUAKES; FREQUENCIES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SEISMOLOGY; SURFACE WAVES; WAVE PROPAGATION; RAYLEIGH WAVES;

GERMANY; LOVE WAVE DISPERSION; LOVE-RAYLEIGH DISCREPANCY; PHASE VELOCITY; RAYLEIGH WAVE DISPERSION; TELESEISMIC EVENTS; UPPER MANTLE ANISOTROPY; WAVENUMBER;

SEISMIC WAVES; DISPERSION (WAVES);

AZIMUTHAL ANISOTROPY; DISPERSION CURVES; RAYLEIGH-WAVE DISPERSION; SEISMIC ANISOTROPY; SOUTHERN GERMANY; TRANSVERSELY ISOTROPIC MODEL; UPPER MANTLE; UPPER MANTLE ANISOTROPY;

EID: 0029666522     PISSN: 00948276     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/96GL01216     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Bamford, D., 1977. Pn velocity anisotropy in a continental upper mantle, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc, 49, 29-48.
2. Cara, M. and Lévêque, J.J., 1988. Anisotropy of the asthenosphere: the higher mode data of the Pacific revisited, Geophys. Res. Lett., 15, 205-208.
3. Cara, M., Nercessian, A. and Nolet, G., 1980. New inferences from higher mode data in Western Europe and Northern Eurasia, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc, 61, 459-478.
4. Dziewonski, A.M. and Anderson, D.L., 1981. Preliminary reference Earth model, Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 25, 297-356.
5. Efron, B. and Gong, G., 1983. A leisurely look at the bootstrap, the jackknife and cross-validation, The American Statistician, 37.1, 36-48.
6. Friederich, W. and Dalkolmo, J., 1995. Complete synthetic seismograrns for a spherically symmetric earth by a numerical computation of the Green's function in the frequency domain, Geophys. J. Int., 122, 537-550.
7. Fuchs, K., 1983. Recently formed elastic anisotropy and petrological models for the continental subcrustal lithosphere in southern Germany, Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 31, 93-118.
8. Kawasaki, I. and Kon'no, F., 1984. Azimuthal anisotropy of surface waves and the possible type of seismic anisotropy due to preferred orientation of olivine in the uppermost mantle beneath the Pacific Ocean, J. Phys. Earth, 32, 229-244.
9. Kennett, B.L.N. and Engdahl, E.R., 1991. Traveltimes for global eartquake location and phase identification, Geophys. J. Int., 105, 429-465.
10. Levshin, A. and Ratnikova, L., 1984. Apparent anisotropy in inhomogeneous media, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 76, 65-70.
11. Maupin, V. and Cara, M., 1992. Love-Rayleigh wave incompatibility and possible deep upper mantle anisotropy in the Iberian Peninsula, Pageoph, 138, 429-444.
12. Montagner, J.P. and Nataf, H.C., 1986. A simple method for inverting the azimuthal anisotropy of surface waves, J. geophys. Res., 91, 511-520.
13. Zeis, S. Gajewski, D. and Prodehl, C., 1990. Crustal structure of southern Germany from seismic refraction data, Tectonophysics, 176, 59-86.