Fields of dreamers and dreamed-up fields: Functional and fake perimetry

Ophthalmology

Volumn 103, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 117-125

  Thompson, J C ^a   Kosmorsky, G S ^a   Ellis, B D ^a  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HYSTERIA; MALINGERING; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; VISION TEST; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT; ADULT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; TEACHING; VISUAL DISORDER; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL SYSTEM;

ADULT; HUMANS; MALINGERING; PATIENT SIMULATION; PERIMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PATHWAYS;

EID: 0029664418     PISSN: 01616420     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(96)30751-3     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Glovinsky Y, Quigley HA, Bissett RA, Miller NR. Artificially produced quadrantanopsia in computed visual field testing. Am J Ophthalmol 110:90-91.
2. TJ Smith RS Baker Parametric findings in functional disorders using automated techniques Ophthalmology 94 1987 1562 1566
3. JFG Stewart Automated perimetry and malingerers Can the Humphrey be outwitted? Ophthalmology 102 1995 27 32
4. MJ Haley The Humphrey Field Analyzer Screening and Threshold Strategies MJ Haley The Field analyzer primer 2nd ed 1987 Humphrey Instruments San Leandro, CA chap. 2