Sensitivity methods for time-continuous, spatially discrete groundwater contaminant transport models

Water Resources Research

Volumn 32, Issue 8, 1996, Pages 2409-2420

  Skaggs, Todd H ^a,b   Barry, D A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b U S SALINITY LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GROUND WATER;

ALGORITHM; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; MODEL; SIMULATION;

GROUNDWATER; POLLUTANT TRANSPORT;

CONTAMINANT TRANSPORT; GROUNDWATER; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY METHOD; TRANSPORT MODEL;

EID: 0029663921     PISSN: 00431397     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/96WR01138     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ahlfeld, D. P., J. M. Mulvey, and G. F. Pinder, Designing optimal strategies for contaminated groundwater remediation, Adv. Water Resour., 9(2), 77-84, 1986.
2. Ahlfeld, D. P., J. M. Mulvey, G. F. Pinder, and E. F. Wood, Contaminated groundwater remediation design using simulation, optimization, and sensitivity theory, 1, Model development, Water Resour. Res., 24(3), 431-441, 1988a.
3. Ahlfeld, D. P., J. M. Mulvey, and G. F. Pinder, Contaminated groundwater design using simulation, optimization, and sensitivity theory, 2, Analysis of a field site, Water Resour. Res., 24(3), 443-452, 1988b.
4. Bear, J., Hydraulics of Groundwater, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1979.
5. Cacuci, D. G., Sensitivity theory for nonlinear systems, 1, Nonlinear functional analysis approach, J. Math. Phys., 22(12), 2794-2802, 1981.
6. Cacuci, D. G., C. F. Weber, E. M. Oblow, and J. H. Marable, Sensitivity theory for general systems of nonlinear equations, Nucl. Sci. Eng., 75, 88-110, 1980.
7. Chang, L.-C., C. A. Shoemaker, and P. L.-F. Liu, Optimal time-varying pumping rates for groundwater remediation: Application of a constrained optimal control algorithm, Water Resour. Res., 28(12), 3157-3173, 1992.
8. de Hoog, F. R., J. H. Knight, and A. N. Stokes, An improved method for numerical inversion of Laplace transforms, SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput., 3(3), 357-366, 1982.
9. Dettinger, M. D., and J. L. Wilson, First order analysis of uncertainty in numerical models of groundwater flow, 1, Mathematical development, Water Resour. Res., 17(1), 149-161, 1981.
10. Dogru, A. H., and J. H. Seinfeld, Comparison of sensitivity coefficient calculation methods in automatic history matching, SPEJ Soc. Pet. Eng. J., 21, 551-557, 1981.
11. Gavalas, G. R., P. C. Shah, and J. H. Seinfeld, Reservoir history matching by Bayesian estimation, Soc. Pet. Eng. J., 16, 337-350, 1976.
12. Germain, D., and E. O. Frind, Modelling contaminant migration in fracture networks: Effects of matrix diffusion, in Contaminant Transport in Groundwater, edited by H. E. Kobus and W. Kinzelbach, pp. 267-274, A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 1989.
13. Gill, P. E., W. Murray, and M. H. Wright, Practical Optimization, Academic, San Diego, Calif., 1981.
14. Gorelick, S. M., Large scale nonlinear deterministic and stochastic optimization: Formulations involving simulation of subsurface contamination, Math. Programm., 48, 19-39, 1990.
15. Gorelick, S. M., C. I. Voss, P. E. Gill, W. Murry, M. A. Saunders, and M. H. Wright, Aquifer reclamation design: The use of contaminant transport simulation combined with nonlinear programming, Water Resour. Res., 20(4), 415-427, 1984.
16. Harrison, B., E. A. Sudicky, and J. A. Cherry, Numerical analysis of solute migration through fractured clayey deposits into underlying aquifers, Water Resour. Res., 28(2), 515-526, 1992.
17. Houyoux, M. R., An evaluation of decision making for aquifer restoration, M.S. thesis, Univ. of N. C., Chapel Hill, 1995.
18. Huyakorn, P. S., and G. F. Pinder, Computational Methods in Subsurface Flow, Academic, San Diego, Calif., 1983.
19. Hwang, J. W., W. C. Cho, and G. T. Yeh, An eigenvalue solution continuous in time to the spatial discretized solute transport equation in steady groundwater flow, Water Resour. Res., 20(11), 1725-1732, 1984.
20. Jang, Y.-S., N. Sitar, and A. Der Kiureghian, Reliability analysis of contaminant transport in saturated porous media, Water Resour. Res., 30(8), 2435-2448, 1994.
21. Kabala, Z. J., and P. C. D. Milly, Sensitivity analysis of flow in unsaturated heterogeneous porous media: Theory, numerical model, and its verification, Water Resour. Res., 26(4), 593-610, 1990.
22. Knopman, D. S., and C. I. Voss, Behavior of sensitivities in the one-dimensional advection-dispersion equation: Implications for parameter estimation and sampling design, Water Resour. Res., 23(2), 253-272, 1987.
23. Kool, J. B., P. S. Huyakorn, E. A. Sudicky, and Z. A. Saleem, A composite modeling approach for subsurface transport of degrading contaminants from land-disposal sites, J. Contam. Hydrol., 17, 69-90, 1994.
24. LaVenue, A. M., and J. F. Pickens, Application of a coupled adjoint sensitivity and kriging approach to calibrate a groundwater flow model, Water Resour. Res., 28(6), 1543-1569, 1992.
25. Li, S. G., F. Raun, and D. McLaughlin, A space-time accurate method for solving solute transport problems, Water Resour. Res., 28(9), 2297-2306, 1992.
26. Moridis, G. J., and D. L. Reddell, The Laplace transform finite difference method for simulation of flow through porous media, Water Resour. Res., 27(8), 1873-1884, 1991.
27. Neuman, S. P., A statistical approach to the inverse problem of aquifer hydrology, 3, Improved solution and added perspective, Water Resour. Res., 16(2), 331-346, 1980.
28. Pinder, G. F., and W. G. Gray, Finite Element Simulation in Surface and Subsurface Hydrology, Academic, San Diego, Calif., 1977.
29. Samper, F. J., and S. P. Neuman, Adjoint state equations for advective-dispersive transport, in Finite Elements in Water Resources: Proceedings of the VI International Conference, edited by A. Sá da Costa et al., pp. 423-437, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1986.
30. Sudicky, E. A., The Laplace transform Galerkin technique: A time-continuous finite element theory and application to mass transport in groundwater, Water Resour. Res., 25(8), 1833-1846, 1989.
31. Sudicky, E. A., The Laplace transform Galerkin technique for efficient time-continuous solution of solute transport in double-porosity media, Geoderma, 46, 209-232, 1990.
32. Sudicky, E. A., and R. G. McLaren, The Laplace transform Galerkin technique for large-scale simulation of mass transport in discretely fractured porous formations, Water Resour. Res., 28(2), 499-514, 1992.
33. Sun, N.-Z., and W. W-G. Yeh, Coupled inverse problems in groundwater modeling, 1, Sensitivity analysis and parameter identification, Water Resour. Res., 26(10), 2507-2525, 1990.
34. Sun, N.-Z., and W. W-G. Yeh, A stochastic inverse solution for transient groundwater flow: Parameter identification and reliability analysis, Water Resour. Res., 28(12), 3269-3280, 1992.
35. Sykes, J. F., J. L. Wilson, and R. W. Andrews, Sensitivity analysis for steady state groundwater flow using adjoint operators, Water Resour. Res., 21(3), 359-371, 1985.
36. Townley, L. R., and J. L. Wilson, Computationally efficient algorithms for parameter estimation and uncertainty propagation in numerical models of groundwater flow, Water Resour. Res., 21(12), 1851-1860, 1985.
37. Umari, A. M. J., and S. M. Gorelick. The problem of complex eigensystems in the semianalytical solution for advancement of time in solute transport simulations: A new method using real arithmetic, Water Resour. Res., 22(7), 1149-1154, 1986.
38. Vemuri, V., and W. J. Karplus, Identification of nonlinear parameters of ground water basins by hybrid computation, Water Resour. Res., 5(1), 172-185, 1969.
39. Wang, H. F., and M. P. Anderson, Introduction to Groundwater Modeling, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1982.
40. Wilson, J. L., and D. E. Metcalfe, Illustration and verification of adjoint sensitivity theory for steady state groundwater flow, Water Resour. Res., 21(11), 1602-1610, 1985.
41. Yeh, W. W-G., Review of parameter identification procedures in groundwater hydrology: The inverse problem, Water Resour. Res., 22(2), 95-108, 1986.
42. Yeh, W. W-G., and N.-Z. Sun, Variational sensitivity analysis, data requirements, and parameter identification in a leaky aquifer system, Water Resour. Res., 26(9), 1927-1938, 1990.
43. Zoppou, C., and J. H. Knight, A quasi-analytical method for solving the advective-diffusion equation with spatially variable coefficients, in Computational Techniques and Applications: CTAC93, edited by D. Stewart, H. Gardner and D. Singleton, pp. 511-517, World Sci., River Edge, N. J., 1993.