Effect of genotype unit number and spatial arrangement on severity of yellow rust in wheat cultivar mixtures

Plant Pathology

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 215-222

  Mundt, C C ^a   Brophy, L S ^a   Kolar, S C ^a  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RESISTANT CULTIVAR; SPATIAL ARRANGEMENT; WHEAT; YELLOW RUST;

POACEAE; PUCCINIA STRIIFORMIS; TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

EID: 0029661779     PISSN: 00320862     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3059.1996.d01-127.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Brophy LS, Mundt CC, 1991. Influence of plant spatial patterns on disease dynamics, plant competition and grain yield in genetically diverse wheat populations. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 35, 1-12.
2. Browning JA, Frey KJ, 1969. Multiline cultivars as a means of disease control. Annual Review of Phytopathology 7, 355-82.
3. Fleming RA, Marsh ML, Tuckwell HC, 1982. Effect of field geometry on the spread of crop disease. Protection Ecology 4, 81-108.
4. Gregory PH, 1973. The Microbiology of the Atmosphere, 2nd ed. London: Leonard Hill.
5. Mundt CC, 1989. Use of the modified Gregory model to describe primary disease gradients of wheat leaf rust produced from area sources of inoculum. Phytopathology 79, 241-6.
6. Mundt CC, Brophy LS, 1988. Influence of number of host genotype units on the effectiveness of host mixtures for disease control: A modelling approach. Phytopathology 78, 1087-94.
7. Mundt CC, Browning JA, 1985a. Development of crown rust epidemics in genetically diverse oat populations: Effect of genotype unit area. Phytopathology 75, 607-10.
8. Mundt CC, Browning JA, 1985b. Genetic diversity and cereal rust management. In: Roelfs AP, Bushnell WR, eds. The Cereal Rusts, Vol. 2. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, 527-60.
9. Mundt CC, Leonard KJ, 1985. Effect of host genotype unit area on epidemic development of crown rust following focal and general inoculations of mixtures of immune and susceptible oat plants. Phytopathology 75, 1141-5.
10. Mundt CC, Leonard KJ, 1986a. Analysis of factors affecting disease increase and spread in mixtures of immune and susceptible plants in computer-simulated epidemics. Phytopathologv 76, 832-40.
11. Mundt CC, Leonard KJ, 1986b. Effect of host genotype unit area on development of focal epidemics of bean rust and common maize rust in mixtures of resistant and susceptible plants. Phytopathology 76, 895-900.
12. Mundt CC, Leonard KJ, Thai WM, Fulton JH, 1986. Computerized simulation of crown rust epidemics in mixtures of immune and susceptible oat plants with different genotype unit areas and spatial distributions of initial disease. Phytopathology 76, 590-8.
13. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 1989. Climatological Data, Oregon. Vol. 95. Asheville, NC: National Climatic Data Center.
14. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 1990. Climatological Data, Oregon, Vol. 96. Asheville, NC: National Climatic Data Center.
15. Ruiz GM, Zapata, JM. 1990. The Variety Colombia: A Variety of Coffee with Resistance to Rust (Hemileia vastatrix Berk. & Br.). Chinchiná-Caldas, Colombia: CENICAFE.
16. SAS Institute, Inc., 1988. SAS/STAT User's Guide, ED. 6·03. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
17. Waggoner, PE, 1962. Weather, time, and chance of infection. Phytopathology 52, 1100-8.
18. Wolfe MS, 1985. The current status and prospects of multiline cultivars and variety mixtures for disease resistance. Annual Review of Phytopathology 21 251-73.
19. Wolfe MS, 1992. Maintaining the value of our varieties. In: Munck L., ed. Barley Genetics VI. Copenhagen: Munksgaard International Publishers, 1055-67.
20. Zadoks JC, Kampmeijer P, 1977. The role of crop populations and their deployment, illustrated by means of a simulator, EPIMUL 76. Annals of the Ne\v York Academy of Sciences 287, 164-90.