Genetic diversity and population structure in the outcrossing populations of Equisetum arvense and E. hyemale (Equisetaceae)

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 83, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 58-62

  Korpelainen, Helena ^a   Kolkkala, Mikko ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Equisetum; Genetic variation; Mating systems; Population structure; Pteridophyta

Indexed keywords

EQUISETUM ARVENSE; EQUISETUM HYEMALE; EQUISETACEAE;

GENETIC DIVERSITY; SELFING;

EID: 0029661586     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2445954     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. AYALA, F. J., J. R. POWELL, M. L. TRACEY, C. A. MOURAO, AND S. PEREZ-SALAS. 1972. Enzyme variability in the Drosophila willistoni group. IV. Genic variation in natural populations of Drosophila willistoni. Genetics 70: 113-139.
2. BOLD, H. C., C. J. ALEXOPOULOS, AND T. DELEVORYAS. 1986. Morphology of plants and fungi. Harper and Row, New York, NY.
3. CRAWFORD, D. J. 1983. Phylogenetic and systematic inferences from electrophoretic studies. In S. D. Tanksley and T. J. Orton [eds.], Isozymes in plant breeding, part A, 257-287. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
4. DÖPP, W. 1950. Eine die Antheridienbildung bei Farnen fördernde Substanz in den Prothallien von Pteridium aquilinum (L.) Kuhn. Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft 63: 139-147.
5. DUCKETT, J. G. 1970. Sexual behaviour of the genus Equisetum, subgenus Equisetum. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 63: 327-352.
6. _. 1977. Towards an understanding of sex determination in Equisetum: an analysis of regeneration in gametophytes of the subgenus Equisetum. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 74: 215-242.
7. _. 1979. An experimental study of the reproductive biology and hybridization in the European and North American species of Equisetum. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 79: 205-229.
8. _. AND A. R. DUCKETT. 1980. Reproductive biology and population dynamics of wild gametophytes of Equisetum. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 80: 1-40.
9. GOTTLIEB, L. D. 1981. Electrophoretic evidence and plant populations. Progress in Phytochemistry 7: 1-46.
10. HAMILTON, R. G., AND R. M. LLOYD. 1991. Antheridiogen in the wild: the development of fern gametophyte communities. Functional Ecology 5: 804-809.
11. HAMRICK, J. L., AND M. J. W. GODT. 1990. Allozyme diversity in plant species. In A. H. D. Brown, M. T. Clegg, A. L. Kahler, and B. S. Weir [eds.], Plant population genetics, breeding, and genetic resources, 43-63. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
12. HAUFLER, C. H. 1987. Electrophoresis is modifying our concepts of evolution in homosporous preridophytes. American Journal of Botany 74: 953-966.
13. _, AND D. E. SOLTIS. 1986. Genetic evidence suggests that homosporous ferns with high chromosome numbers are diploid. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 83: 4389-4393.
14. HAUKE, R. L. 1967. Sexuality in a wild population of Equisetum arvense gametophytes. American Fern Journal 57: 59-66.
15. _. 1974. The taxonomy of Equisetum - an overview. New Botanist 1: 89-95.
16. _. 1977. Experimental studies on growth and sexual determination in Equisetum gametophytes. American Fern Journal 67: 18-31.
17. HEBERT, P. D. N., AND M. J. BEATON. 1989. Methodologies for allozyme analysis using cellulose acetate electrophoresis. Helena Laboratories, Beaumont, TX.
18. HOLSINGER, K. E. 1987. Gametophytic self-fertilization in homosporous plants: development, evaluation, and application of a statistical method for evaluating its importance. American Journal of Botany 74: 1173-1183.
19. KLEKOWSKI, E. J. 1969. Reproductive biology of the Pteridophyta. II. Theoretical considerations. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 62: 347-359.
20. LI, C. C., AND D. G. HORVITZ. 1953. Some methods of estimating the inbreeding coefficient. American Journal of Human Genetics 5: 107-117.
21. LÖVE, A., D. LÖVE, AND R. E. G. PICHI SERMOLLI. 1977. Cytotaxonomical atlas of the Pteridophyta. Strauss and Cramer, Hirschberg.
22. NEI, M. 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89: 583-590.
23. PAGE, C. N. 1972. An assessment of the inter-specific relationships in Equisetum subgenus Equisetum. New Phytologist 71: 355-369.
24. POULIK, M. D. 1957. Starch gel electrophoresis in discontinuous system of buffers. Nature 180: 1477-1479.
25. SOLTIS, D. E. 1986. Genetic evidence for diploidy in Equisetum. American Journal of Botany 73: 908-913.
26. _, C. H. HAUFLER, D. C. DARROW, AND G. J. GASTONY. 1983. Starch gel electrophoresis of ferns: a compilation of grinding buffers, gel and electrode buffers, and staining schedules. American Fern Journal 73: 9-27.
27. _, AND P. S. SOLTIS. 1989. Polyploidy, breeding systems, and genetic differentiation in homosporous pteridophytes. In D. E. Soltis and P. S. Soltis [eds.], Isozymes in plant biology, 241-258. Dioscorides Press, Portland, OR.
28. _, AND _. 1992. The distribution of selfing rates in homosporous ferns. American Journal of Botany 79: 97-100.
29. _, P. S. SOLTIS, AND R. D. NOYES. 1988. An electrophoretic investigation of intragametophytic selfing in Equisetum arvense. American Journal of Botany 75: 231-237.
30. SOLTIS, P. S., AND D. E. SOLTIS. 1990. Genetic variation within and among populations of ferns. American Fern Journal 80: 161-172.
31. TRYON, R. M., AND G. VITALE. 1977. Evidence for antheridiogen production and its mediation of a mating system in natural populations of fern gametophytes. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 74: 243-249.
32. WOLF, P. G., E. SHEFFIELD, AND C. H. HAUFLER. 1991. Estimates of gene flow, genetic substructure and population heterogeneity in bracken (Pteridium aquilinum). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 42: 407-423.
33. WORKMAN, P. L., AND J. D. NISWANDER. 1970. Population studies on southwestern Indian tribes. II. Local genetic differentiation in the Papago. American Journal of Human Genetics 22: 24-49.
34. WRIGHT, S. 1931. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16: 97-159.
35. _. 1965. The interpretation of population structure by F-statistics with special regard to systems of mating. Evolution 19: 395-420.