Are the Characeae able to indicate the origin of groundwater in former river channels?

Vegetatio

Volumn 125, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 207-222

  Bornette, Gudrun ^a   Guerlesquin, Micheline ^b   Henry, Christophe P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE L'OUEST   (France)

Author keywords

Aquatic macrophytes; Chara; Hillslope aquifer; Nitella; Physico chemistry; Seepage water

Indexed keywords

ALGAE; CHARA; CHARA GLOBULARIS; CHARA HISPIDA; CHARA MAJOR; CHARA VULGARIS; CHARACEAE; CHARALES; NITELLA; CHARA SYNCARPA;

AQUATIC MACROPHYTE; GROUNDWATER; GROUNDWATER ORIGIN; HILLSLOPE AQUIFER; RIVER CHANNEL; SEEPAGE; WATER CHEMISTRY;

EID: 0029660885     PISSN: 00423106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF00044652     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Amoros, C., Roux, A. L., Reygrobellet, J. L., Bravard, J. P. & Pautou, G. 1987. A method for applied ecological studies of fluvial hydrosystems. Regul. Rivers Res. Manage. 1: 17-36.
2. Auderset Joye, D. 1993. Contribution à l'écologie des Characées de Suisse. PhD. Thesis, University of Geneva, Switzerland, 273 p.
3. Balocco-Castella, C. 1988. Les macrophytes aquatiques des milieux abandonnés par le Haut-Rhône et l'Ain. Diagnostic phytoécologique sur l'évolution et le fonctionnement de ces ecosystèmes. PhD. Thesis, University Lyon I, France. 150 p.
4. Bornette, G. & Amoros, C. 1991. Aquatic vegetation and hydrology of a braided river floodplain. J. Veget. Sci. 2: 497-512.
5. Bornette, G., Amoros, C. & Collilieux, G. 1994a. Role of seepage supply in aquatic vegetation dynamics in former river channels: prediction testing using a hydroelectric construction. Environ. Manage. 18: 223-234.
6. Bornette, G., Amoros, C. & Chessel, D. 1994b. Effect of allogenic processes on successional rates in former river channels. J. Veget. Sci. 5: 237-246.
7. Bornette, G. & Heiler, G. 1994. Environmental and biological responses of former channels to river incision: a diachronic study on the Upper Rhone River. Regul. Rivers Res. Manage. 9: 79-92.
8. Bornette, G. & Large, A. R. G. 1995. Groundwater-surface water ecotones at the upstream part of confluences in former river channels. Hydrobiologia 310: 123-137.
9. Braun-Blanquet, J. 1932. Plant sociology: the study of plants communities. Transl. Fuller, G. D. & Conard H. S. McGraw Hill Book Co., New York, USA.
10. Bravard, J. P., Amoros, C. & Pautou, G. 1986. Impact of civil engineering works on the successions of communities in a fluvial system. Oikos 47: 92-111.
11. Caffrey, J. & King, J.J. 1989. Aspects of Charophyte ecology in three drained tributaries of the River Boyne, Ireland. Bull. Irish Biogeogr. Soc. 12: 6-17.
12. Carbiener, R., Tremolieres, M., Mercier, J. L. & Klein, J. P. 1988. pp. 171-200. In: Kobus, H. R. & Zilliox, L. (eds), Les associations végétales, biorevelatrices des échanges hydrologiques eaux de surface, eaux souterraines. Nitratbelastung des Grundwassers, Mitteilungen Institute fur Wasserbau, Stuttgart, Germany, Heft 71.
13. Carbiener, R., Trémolières, M., Mercier, J. L. & Ortscheit, A. 1990. Aquatic macrophyte communities as bioindicators of eutrophication in calcareous oligosaprobe stream waters (Upper Rhine plain, Alsace). Vegetatio 86: 71-88.
14. Castella, C. & Amoros, C. 1984. Répartition des Characées dans les bras morts du Haut-Rhône et de l'Ain et signification écologique. Cryptogamie, Algologie 5: 127-139.
15. Cernohous, F. & Husak, S. 1986. Macrophyte vegetation of Eastern and Northeastern Bohemia. Folia Geobot. Phytotaxon. 21: 1-112.
16. Chessel, D. & Doledec, S. 1993. ADE version 3.6: Hypercard ©Stacks and Quickbasic Microsoft ©Programme Library for the Analysis of Environmental Data. Ecologie des eaux douces et des grands fleuves-URA CNRS 1451, Université Lyon 1, 69622 Villeurbanne, France.
17. Compère, P. 1992. Charophytes. Flore pratique des Algues d'Eau Douce de Belgique no 4. Journal Botanique National de Belgique, Meise, Belgium.
18. Corillion, R. 1975. Flore et végétation du massif armoricain: tome IV. Flore des Charophytes (Characees) du massif armoricain et des contrées voisines d'Europe occidentale. Jouve (ed.), Paris, France.
19. Crawford. S. A. 1977. Chemical, physical and biological changes associated with Chara succession in farm ponds. Hydrobiologia 55: 209-217.
20. Doledec, S. & Chessel, D. 1991. Recent developments in linear ordination methods for environmental sciences. Adv. Ecol.: 1: 133-155.
21. Feizines, J. C. 1977. Analyse des relations entre la minéralisation des eaux douces stagnantes et la distribution des végétaux qui les peuplent. Etude sur les étangs en Bourbonnais, Nivernais, Morvan, Puisaye. Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot. Biol. Vég. 18: 221-250.
22. Forsberg, G. C. 1965. Environmental conditions of Swedish Charophytes. Symb. Bot. Ups. 18: 1-67.
23. Goodall, D. W. 1954. Objective methods for the classification of vegetation. III. An essay in the use of factor analysis. Aust. J. Bot. 2: 304-324.
24. Grillas, P. 1990. Distribution of submerged macrophytes in the Camargue in relation to environmental factors. J. Veget. Sci. 1: 393-402.
25. Guerlesquin, M. & Mériaux, J. L. 1981. Characées et végétations associées des milieux aquatiques du Nord de la France. Colloq. Phytosociolog. 10: 415-444.
26. Guinochet, M. & de Vilmorin, R. 1973. Flore de France. Editions du C.N.R.S., Paris, France. Vol. 5.
27. Juget, J., Yi, B. J., Roux, C., Richoux, Ph., Richardot-Coulet, M., Reygrobellet, J. L., & Amoros, C. 1979. Structrure et fonctionnement des écosystèmes du Haut Rhône français. VII. Le complexe hydrographique de la Lône des pêcheurs (un ancien méandre du Rhône). Schweiz. Z. Hydrol. 41: 395-417.
28. Klein, J. P. & Carbiener, R. 1989. Intérêt et application de la cartographie écologique a l'élude d'écosystemes dulcaquicoles: l'exemple de deux rivières phréatiques du champ d'inondation de l'Ill. Bull. Assoc. Philoma. Alsace-Lorraine 25: 33-61.
29. Kohler, A., Brinkmeier, R. & Vollrath, H. 1974. Verbreitung und Indikatorwert der submersen Makrophyten in den Fließgewassern der Friedberger Au. Beri. Bayer. Bot. Ges. Erforsch. Heim. Flora 45: 5-36.
30. Kohler, A. 1975. Submerse Makrophyten und ihre Gesellschaften als Indikatoren der Gewasserbelastung. Beitr. Naturk. Forsch. Suedwestdtschl. 34: 149-159.
31. Kohler, A. & Schiele, S. 1985. Veränderungen von Flora und Vegetation in den kalkreichen Fließgewassern der Friedberger Au (bei Augsburg) von 1972 bis 1982 unter veränderten Belastungbedingungen. Arch. Hydrobiol. 103: 137-199.
32. Krause, W. 1981. Characcen als Bioindikatoren für den Gewasserzustand. Limnologica 13: 399-418.
33. Krause, W. & King, J. J. 1994. The ecological status of Lough Corrib, Ireland, as indicated by physiographic factors, water chemistry and macrophytic flora. Vegetatio 110: 149-161.
34. Kufel, L. & Osimek, T. 1994. Can Chara control phosphorus cycling in Lake Luknajno (Poland)? Hydrobiologia 275/276: 277-283.
35. Melzer, A., Harlacher, R., Held, K. & Vogt, E. 1988. Die Makrophyten Vegetation des Ammer-, Worth-, und Pilsensees sowie des Wesslinger Sees. Information Berichte der Bayerischen Landesamt für Wasserwirtschaft, Munich, Germany. 266 p.
36. Mercier, P. 1991. Etude des relations espèces-environnement et analyse de la co-structure d'un couple de tableaux. PhD. Thesis, University Lyon I, France, 178 p.
37. Moore, J. A. 1979. The current status of the Characeae (Stoneworts) in the British Isles. Watsonia 12: 297-309.
38. Moore, J. A. 1986. Charophytes of Great Britain and Ireland. BSBI Handbook no 5, Botanical Society of the British Isles, London, UK.
39. Norris, R. H., Lake, P. L., & Swain, R. 1982. Ecological effects of mine effluents on the South Esk River, North-Eastern Tasmania. III. Benthic macroinvertebrates. Aust. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 33: 789-809.
40. Orloci, L. 1966. Geometric models in ecology. I. The theory and application of some ordination methods. J. Ecol. 54: 193-215.
41. Ortscheit, A. 1985. Evolution de la végétation aquatique du Waldrhein près de Strasbourg, un ancien bras du Rhin à status hydrologique original. Bull. Assoc. Philomat. Alsace-Lorraine 21: 195-237.
42. Schmider, F. & Ottow, J. C. G. 1985. Characterization of differently polluted ponds by submerged macrophytes and various denitrifying bacteria. Verb. Theor. Angew. Limnol. 22: 2303-2308.
43. Simons, J., Ohm, M., Daalder, R., Boers, P. & Rip, W. 1994. Restoration of Botshol (The Netherlands) by reduction of external nutrient load: recovery of acharacean community, dominated by Chara connivens. Hydrobiologia 275/276: 243-253.
44. Stewart, N. F. & Church, J. M. 1992. Stoneworts. Red Data Book of Britain and Ireland, the Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough, UK.
45. Tucker, L. R. 1958. An inter-battery method of factor analysis. Psychometrica 23: 111-136.
46. Tutin, T. G., Heywood, V. H., Burges, N. A., Valentine, D. H., Walters, S. & Webbs, D. A. (eds) 1964. Flora Europaea. Vol. 5. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
47. Wade, P.M. 1990. The colonisation of disturbed freshwater habitats by Characeae. Folia Geobot. Phytotaxon. 25: 275-278.
48. Wattenhoffer, R. 1984. Macrophytes, pp. 337-353. In: Commission Internationale pour le Leman (ed.), La Protection des Eaux du Leman contre la Pollution. Synthèse 1957-1982, Lausanne, Switzerland.
49. Wiegleb, G. 1978. Untersuchungen über den Zuzammenhang zwischen hydrochemischen Umweltfaktoren und Makrophytenvegetation in stehenden Gewassern. Arch. Hydrobiol. 83: 443-484.
50. Wiegleb, G. 1981. Structur, Verbreitung und Bewertung von Makrophytengesellschaften niedersachsischer Fließgewasser. Limnologica 13: 427-448.
51. Wood, R. D. 1950. Stability and zonation of Characeae. Ecology 34: 642-647.