On phylogeny of Hippophea (Elaeagnaceae)

Nordic Journal of Botany

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 51-62

  Hyvönen, Jaakko ^a,b  

^a Dept of Botany ^*  (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HIPPOPHAE; ELAEAGNACEAE; HIPPOPHAE GYANTSENSIS; HIPPOPHAE NEUROCARPA; HIPPOPHAE RHAMNOIDES; HIPPOPHAE RHAMNOIDES NEUROCARPA; HIPPOPHAE SALICIFOLIA; HIPPOPHAE SALICIFOLIA SINENSIS; HIPPOPHAE SALICIFOLIA YUNNANENSIS; HIPPOPHAE TIBETANA; SHEPHERDIA;

CLADISTICS; PHYLOGENY; TAXONOMY;

EID: 0029659446     PISSN: 0107055X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-1051.1996.tb00214.x     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Abrams, L. 1951. Illustrated flora of the Pacific states. Vol. 3. -Stanford.
2. Archibald, J. D. 1994. Metataxon concepts and assessing possible ancestry using phylogenetic systematics. - Syst. Biol. 43: 27-40.
3. Arohonka, T. & Rousi, A. 1980. Karyotypes and C-bands in Shepherdia and Elaeagnus. - Ann. Bot. Fennici 17: 258-263.
4. Avdeev, V. I. 1981. Novyi podvid oblepikhi (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) - Izv. Akad. Nauk Tadzh. SSR, Biol. Nauk, 1 (82): 102-103.
5. -1983. Novaya taksonomiya roda oblepikha: Hippophae L. -Izv. Akad. Nauk Tadzh. SSR, Biol. Nauk. 4: 11-17.
6. Bremer, K. 1990. Combinable component consensus. - Cladistics 6: 369-372.
7. -1992. Ancestral areas: a cladistic interpretation of the center of origin concept. - Syst. Biol. 41: 436-445.
8. Cao, Y-L. & Lu, R.-S. 1989. Karyotype analysis of Hippophae L. in China. - Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 27: 118-123.
9. Carpenter, J. M. 1988. Choosing among multiple equally parsimonious trees. - Cladistics 4: 291-296.
10. Crisp, M. D. & Weston, P. H. 1993. Geographic and ontogenetic variation in morphology of Australian waratahs (Telopea: Proteaceae). - Syst. Biol. 42: 49-76.
11. Cronquist, A. 1988. The evolution and classification of flowerins: plants. 2. ed. - New York.
12. Dahlgren, R., Hansen, B., Jakohsen, K., Rosendal Jensen, S., Larsen, K. & Juhl Nielsen, B. 1980. Angiospermernes taxonomi. 2. Dicotyledonernes taxonomi: Magnolianae-Proteanae. 2. ed. - Copenhagen.
13. Danielsen, A. 1977. Tindved (Hippophae rhamnoides) i Homborsund på Skagerrak-kysten. - Blyttia 35: 1-9.
14. Davis, J. I. & Manos, P. S. 1991. Isozyme variation and species delimitation in the Puccinellia nuttalliana complex (Poaceae): an application of the phylogenetic species concept. -Syst. Bot. 16: 431-445.
15. -& Nixon, K. C. 1992. Populations, genetic variation, and the delimitation of phylogenetic species. - Syst. Biol. 41: 421-435.
16. Donoghue, M. J. 1985. A critique of biological species concept and recommendations for a phylogenetic alternative. -Bryologist 88: 172-181.
17. -1989. Phylogenies and the analysis of evolutionary sequences, with examples from seed plants. - Evolution 43: 1137-1156.
18. Eliseev, I. P., Mazaeva, E. Y., Malena, T. V. & Ivashin, I. I. 1984. Formovae raznoobrazie nekotorykh populyatsii Hippophae rhamnoides L. v Kirgizskoi SSR. - Rast. Resursy 20: 502-509.
19. Ermakov, B. S. & Koikov, N. T. 1981. Osobennosti populyatisii oblepikhi iz doliny r. Kitoi (Irkutskaya obi.) - Rast. Resursy 17: 184-189.
20. Farris, J. S. 1969. A successive approximations approach to character weighting. - Syst. Zool. 18: 374-385.
21. -1983. The logical basis of phylogenetic analysis. - In: Platnick, N. & Funk, V. (eds), Advances in cladistics. Volume 2. New York, pp. 7-36.
22. -1989. The retention index and the rescaled consistency index. - Cladistics 5: 417-419.
23. Gams, H. 1943. Der Sanddorn (Hippophae rhamnoides) im Alpengebiet. - Beih. Bot. Centralbl. 62. Abt. B: 68-96.
24. Hauser, D. L. 1992. Similarity, falsification and character state order - a reply to Wilkinson. - Cladistics 8: 339-344.
25. Hauser, D. L. & Presch, W. 1991. The effect of ordered characters on phylogenetic reconstruction. - Cladistics 7: 243-265.
26. Hennig, W. 1950. Grundzüge einer Theorie der phylogenetischen Systematik. - Deutscher Zentralverlag, Berlin.
27. Hess, H. E., Landolt, E. & Hirzel, R. 1970. Flora der Schweiz 2. - Birkhäuser. Basel.
28. Hitchcock, C. L. & Cronquist, A. 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. - Seattle.
29. Huntley, B. 1988. Glacial and holocene vegetation history - 20 ky to present. Europe. - In: Huntley, B & Webb III, T. (eds), Handbook of vegetation science. Vegetation history, pp. 341-383. Kluwer. Dordrecht.
30. Hutchinson, J. 1969. Evolution and phylogeny of flowering plants. - London.
31. Imamaliev, G. N. & Panteleeva, E. I. 1980. Kharakteristika nekotorykh form oblepikhi rasprostranennyh v predgoryakh Bol'shogo kavkaza (Azerbaidzhanskaya SSR). - Rast. Resursy 16: 547-549.
32. Kapuscinski, R. 1977. Rokitnik zwyczajny Hippophae rhamnoides L. na polskim wybrzezu Baltyku: zmiennos-morfologiczna. - Fragm. Flor. Geobot. 23: 17-36.
33. Kluge, A. G. & Wolf, A. J. 1993. Cladistics: what's in a word. -Cladistics 9: 183-199.
34. Korzinnikov, Y. S., Golovatyi, A. I. & Gur'yanov, A. F. 1984. Morfologicheskie i biokhimicheskie osobennosti Hippophae rhamnoides L. v Tadzhikistane. - Rast. Resursy 20: 368-371.
35. Lian, Y.-S. 1988. New discoveries of the genus Hippophae L. (Elaeagnaceae). - Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 26: 235-237.
36. Lipscomb, D. I. 1992. Parsimony, homology and the analysis of multistate characters. - Cladistics 8: 45-65.
37. Liu, S.-W. & He, T.-N. 1978. The genus Hippophae from Qing-Zang plateau. - Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 16: 106-108.
38. Maddison, W. P. & Maddison, D. R. 1992. MacClade: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Version 3.0. - Computer program distributed by the Sinauer Associates. Sunderland.
39. McDade, L. 1990. Hybrids and phylogenetic systematics. I. Patterns of character expresston in hybrids and their implications for cladistic analysis. - Evolution 44: 1685-1700.
40. Meikle, R. D. 1985. Flora of Cyprus. Vol. 2. - Kew.
41. Queiroz, K. de 1988. Systematics and the Darwinian revolution. - Philosophy of Science 55: 238-259.
42. Mihajlovic, D. 1992. Xerophytic plant forms in Palaeogene floras of the western Balkan-peninsula. - In: Kovar-Eder, J. (ed.), Palaeovegetational development in Europe and regions relevant to its palaeofloristic evolution. Museum of Natural History. Vienna, pp. 189-196.
43. Mishler, B. D. & De Luna, E. 1991. The use of ontogenetic data in phylogenetic analyses of mosses. - Advance in Bryology 4: 121-167.
44. Momiyama, Y. & Hara, H. 1973. The genus Elaeagnus of eastern Himalaya. - J. Jap. Bot. 48: 257-267.
45. Nixon, K. C. & Carpenter, J. M. 1993: On outgroups. - Cladistics 9: 413-426.
46. O'Hara, R. J. 1993. Systematic generalization, historical fate, and the species problem. - Syst. Biol. 42: 231-246.
47. Reynaud, C. 1976. Palaeoecological significance of Hippophae rhamnoides, with an example of the protocratic vegetational stage in NE Fennoscandia. - Boreas 5: 9-24.
48. Ronquist, F. 1994: Ancestral areas and parsimony. - Syst. Biol. 43: 67-273.
49. Rousi, A. 1965. Observations on the cytology and variation of European and Asiatic populations of Hippophae rhamnoides. - Ann. Bot. Fennici 2: 1-18.
50. -1971. The cenus Hippophae L. A taxonomic study. - Ann. Bot. Fennici 8: 177-227.
51. -& Arohonka, T. 1980. C-bands and ploidy level of Hippophae rhamnoides. - Hereditas 92: 327-330.
52. -, Karunen, P., Eronen, P. & Hakala, I. 1978. Comparative cromatographic study of Eurasian Hippophae populations. -Ann. Bot. Fennici 15: 73-79.
53. -, Karunen, P. & Hakala, I. 1982. Chemical variation in Eurasian populations of Hippophae rhamnoides revealed by two-dimensional thin-layer chromatography. - Ann. Bot. Fennici 19: 219-224.
54. Sandt, 1925. Zur Kenntnis der Beiknospen. - Bot. Abhandl. 7: 1-160.
55. Scoggan, H. J. 1979. The flora of Canada. Part 4. - Ottawa.
56. Servettaz, C. 1909. Monographie des Eléagnacées. - Beih. Bot. Centralbl. 25: 1-420.
57. Shapiro, D. K., Garanovich, I. M., Anakhimovskaya, L. V., Narizhnaya, T. I. & Krivosheya, L. P. 1979. Biokhimicheskaya i morfologicheskaya kharakteristika oblepikhi, proizrastayuschei v det'te r. Dunaya. - Rast. Resursy 15: 544-548.
58. Slowinski, J. B. 1993. "Unordered" versus "ordered" characters. - Syst. Biol. 42: 155-165.
59. Soest, J. L. van 1952. Zwei Unterarten von Hippophae rhamnoides L. - Mitt. Flor.-soz. Arb. N.F. 3: 88.
60. Sorsa, P. 1971. Pollen morphological study of the genus Hippophae L., including the new taxa recognized by A. Rousi. -Ann. Bot. Fennici 8: 228-236.
61. Stevens, P. F. 1991. Character states, morphological variation, and phylogenetic analysis: a review. - Syst. Botany 16: 553-583.
62. Swofford, D. L. 1993. PAUP: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony. Version 3.1.1. - Computer program distributed by the Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign.
63. Veldkamp, J. F. 1986. Elaeagnaceae. - In: Steenis, C. G. G. J. van (ed.), Flora Malesiana. Vol. 10: 151-156.
64. Wiley, E. O., Siegel-Causey, E., Brooks, D. R. & Funk, V. A. 1991. The compleat cladist. A primer of phylogenetic procedures. - University of Kansas. Museum of Natural History Special Publication 19: 1-157.
65. Wilkinson, M. 1992. Ordered versus unordered characters. -Cladistics 8: 375-385.
66. Vrana, P. & Wheeler, W. 1992. Individual organisms as terminal entities: laying the species problem to rest. - Cladistics 8: 67-72.
67. Yao, Y. & Tigerstedt, P. M. A. 1993. Isozyme studies of genetic diversity and evolution in Hippophae. - Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 40: 153-164.
68. Zhang, Z. X., Gao, Z. Q. & Zhang, Y. 1992. A SEM study on the morphology of foliar surface of seabuckthorn and Elaeagnus and their implication on taxonomy. I. The morphology of foliar surface and their attachment. - Bull. Bot. Res. North-East. Forest. Univ. 12: 169-176.
69. -, Zhang, Y. & Gao, Z. Q. 1992. A SEM study on the morphology of foliar surface of seabuckthorn and Elaeagnus and their implication on taxonomy. II. The morphology of foliar surface of seabuckthorn and their implication on taxonomy. - Bull. Bot. Res. North-East. Forest. Univ. 12: 407-415.