De-listing the American peregrine falcon: Is it premature?

Wildlife Society Bulletin

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 429-435

  Pagel, Joel E ^a,c,d,e,f   Bell, Douglas A ^b,g,h,i   Norton, Brian E ^a,j,k,l  

^a USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (United States)

^c US Forest Service   (United States)

^d S Cruz Predatory Bird Res Group   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN STEVENS POINT   (United States)

^f USFS Pacific Northwest Research Lab   (United States)

^g HUMBOLDT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^j S Cruz Predatory Bird Res Group   (United States)

^k UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^l NONE

more..

Author keywords

de listing; peregrine falcon; population viability; species recovery

Indexed keywords

AMERICAN PEREGRINE FALCON; CONSERVATION STATUS; DEMOGRAPHY; PEREGRINE; POPULATION TREND;

USA;

FALCO PEREGRINUS ANATUM;

EID: 0029659424     PISSN: 00917648     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. BARROWCLOUGH, G. F. 1980. Gene flow, effective population sizes, and genetic variance components in birds. Evolution 34:789-798.
2. BARROWCLOUGH, G. F., AND S. L. COATS. 1985. The demography and population genetics of owls, with special reference to the conservation of the spotted owl (Strix occidentalis). Pages 75-85 in R. Gutierrez and A. Carey, eds. Ecology and management of the spotted owl in the Pacific Northwest. Pacific Northwest For. and Exp. Station, Portland, Oreg.
3. BOND, R. M. 1946. The peregrine population of western North America. Condor 48:101-116.
4. CADE, T. J. 1988. The breeding of peregrines and other falcons in captivity: an historical summary. Pages 539-547 in T. J. Cade, J. H. Enderson, C. G. Thelander, and C. M. White, eds. Peregrine falcon populations: their management and recovery. The Peregrine Fund, Inc., Boise, Id. 949pp.
5. CADE, T. J., J. H. ENDERSON, C. G. THELANDER, AND C. M. WHITE, editors. 1988. Peregrine falcon populations; their management and recovery. The Peregrine Fund, Inc., Boise, Id. 949pp.
6. CAUGHLEY, G. 1994. Directions in conservation biology. J. Anim. Ecol. 63:215-244
7. DINERSTEIN, E., AND G. MCCRACKEN. 1990. Endangered greater one-horned rhinoceros carry high levels of genetic variation. Conserv. Biol. 4:417-422.
8. ENDERSON, J. H., W. HEINRICH, L. KIFF, AND C. M. WHITE. 1995. Population changes in North American Peregrines. Trans. North Am. Fisb and Wildl. Conf. 60:142-161.
9. FYFE, R. W., AND R. R. OLENDORFF. 1976. Minimizing the dangers of nesting studies to raptors and other sensitive species. Can. Wildl. Serv., Occas. Pap. No. 23. 17pp.
10. HARRIS, R. B., AND F. W. ALLENDORF. 1989. Genetically effective population size of large mammals: an assessment of estimation. Conserv. Biol. 3:181-191.
11. HICKEY, J. J. 1942. Eastern population of the duck hawk. Auk 59:176-204.
12. HICKEY, J. J. 1969. Peregrine falcon populations: their biology and decline. Univ. Wisconsin Press, Madison. 596pp.
13. INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES (IUCN). 1987. Translocation of living organisms: Introductions, re-introductions, and re-stocking. IUCN position statement. Gland, Switzerland.
14. KIFF, L. F. 1988. Commentary-changes in the status of the peregrine in North America: an overview. Pages 123-139 in T. J. Cade, J. H. Enderson, C. G. Thelander, and C. M. White, eds. Peregrine falcon populations: their management and recovery. The Peregrine Fund, Inc., Boise, Id. 949pp.
15. LANDE, R. 1988a. Genetics and demography in biological conservation. Science 241:1455-1460.
16. LANDE, R. 1988b. Demographic models of the northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina). Oecologia 75:601-607.
17. LANDE, R. 1995. Mutation and conservation. Conserv. Biol. 9:782-791.
18. LAURENSON, K, N. WIELEBNOWSKI, AND T. CARO. 1995. Extrinsic factors and juvenile mortality in cheetahs. Conserv. Biol. 9:1329-1331.
19. MESTA, R., T. SWEM, AND S. LAWRENCE. 1995. Advance notice of a proposal to remove the American peregrine falcon from the list of endangered and threatened wildlife. Fed. Register 60(126):34406-34409.
20. NEI, M., T. MARUYAMA, AND R. CHAKRABORTY. 1975. The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution 29:1-10.
21. NEWTON, I. 1979. Population ecology of raptors. T and AD Poyser, Berkhamsted, England. 399pp.
22. NUNNEY, L., AND D. R. ELAM. 1994. Estimating the effective population size of conserved populations. Conserv. Biol. 8:175-184.
23. O'BRIEN, S. J., AND E. MAYR. 1991. Bureaucratic mischief: recognizing endangered species and subspecies. Science 251:1187-1188.
24. PULLIAM, H. R., AND J. B. DUNNING. 1994. Demographic processes: Population dynamics on heterogeneous landscapes. Pages 179-205 in G. K. Meffe and C. R. Carrol, eds. Principles of conservation biology. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Mass. 600pp.
25. RATCLIFFE, D. 1993. The peregrine falcon. T and AD Poyser. London, England. 416pp.
26. REDIG, P. T., AND H. B. TORDOFF. 1994. Midwest peregrine falcon restoration: 1994 report. The Raptor Center, Univ. Minnesota., St. Paul. 76pp.
27. REYNOLDS, G. F. 1995. Letter to Judy Hohman, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. U.S. For. Serv., Washington Off. File code 2670, 30 August 1995.
28. RYMAN, N., AND L. LAIKRE. 1991. Effects of supportive breeding on the genetically effective population size. Conserv. Biol. 5:325-329.
29. RYMAN, N., P. E. JORDE, AND L. LAIKRE. 1995. Supportive breeding and variance effective population size. Conserv. Biol. 9:1619-1628.
30. SOULÉ, M. E. 1987. Viable populations for conservation. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, N.Y. 189pp.
31. TEAR, T. H., J. M. SCOTT, P. H. HAYWOOD, AND B. GRIFFITH. 1995. Recovery plans and the Endangered Species Act: are criticisms supported by data? Conserv. Biol. 9:182-195.
32. TEMPLE, S. A., AND T. J. CADE. 1988. Genetic issues associated with recovery efforts for three endangered raptors. Pages 17-29 in D. K. Garcelon and G. W. Roemer, eds. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Raptor Reintroduction, 1985. Inst. Wildl. Stud., Arcata, Calif..
33. U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE. 1982. Recovery plan for peregrine falcon (Pacific population). Pacific Coast American Peregrine Falcon Recovery Team. U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv., Denver, Colo. 87pp.
34. U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE. 1984. American peregrine falcon Rocky Mountain/southwest population recovery plan. Prepared in cooperation with the American Peregrine Falcon Recovery Team. U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv., Denver, Colo. 105pp.
35. U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE. 1993. Addendum to the Pacific Coast (1992) and Rocky Mountain/southwest (Revised, 1984) American Peregrine Falcon Recovery Plans. Tech./Agency Rev. Draft. Prepared by the Western Peregrine Falcon Recovery Team. U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv., Portland, Oreg. 20pp.
36. WOOTEN, T. J., AND D. A. BELL. 1992. A metapopulation model of the peregrine falcon in California: viability and management strategies. Ecol. Appl. 2:307-321.
37. WRIGHT, S. 1938. Size of population and breediag structure in relation to evolution. Science 87:430-431.