Air quality predictions of the urban airshed model containing improved advection and chemistry algorithms

Environmental Science and Technology

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 1163-1175

  Winkler, Sandra L ^a   Chock, David P ^a  

^a FORD RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FORMALDEHYDE; HYDROGEN PEROXIDE; NITRIC ACID; NITRIC OXIDE; NITROGEN DIOXIDE; OZONE; PEROXYACETYLNITRATE;

AIR POLLUTION; AIR QUALITY; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; MODEL; SIMULATION; URBAN AREA;

ADVECTION ALGORITHM; AIR POLLUTANT TRANSPORT; AIR QUALITY PREDICTION; IMPLICIT/EXPLICIT HYBRID; PHOTOCHEMICAL GRID MODEL; URBAN AIRSHED MODEL;

ADVECTION/CHEMISTRY; AIR POLLUTION; ALGORITHMS; MODELS; URBAN AIRSHED;

EID: 0029656577     PISSN: 0013936X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/es950403c     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. U.S. EPA. Urban Airshed Model Version 6.21, Dated 93287; U.S. EPA: Research Triangle Park, NC, 1993.
2. Chock, D. P.; Winkler, S. L.; Sun, P. A comparison of stiff chemistry solvers for air quality modeling. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1994, 28, 1882-1892.
3. Smolarkiewicz, P. K.; Clark, T. L. The multidimensional positive definite advection transport algorithm: further development and applications. J. Comput. Phys. 1986, 67, 396-438.
4. Chock D. P. A comparison of numerical methods for solving the advection equation-III. Atmos. Environ. 1991, 25A, 853-871.
5. Chock, O.P.; Winkler, S. L. A comparison of advection algorithms coupled with chemistry. Atmos. Environ. 1994, 28, 2659-2675.
6. Chock, D. P.; Winkler, S. L. Air quality predictions using a fixed layer depth vertical structure in the Urban Airshed Model. In preparation.
7. Hindmarsh, A. C. LSODE and LSODI, Two new initial value ordinary differential equation solvers. ACM-SIGNUM Neu'sl. 1980, 15 (4), 10-11.
8. Young, T. R.; Boris, J. P. A numerical technique for solving stiff ordinary differential equations associated with the chemical kinetics of reactive flow problems. J. Phys. Chem. 1977, 81, 2424-2427.
9. Hesstvedt, E.; Hov, Ø.; Isaksen, I. S. A. Quasi-steady-state approximations in air pollution modeling: comparison of two numerical schemes for oxidant prediction. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 1978, 10, 971-994.
10. Sun, P., Chock, D. P.; Winkler, S. L. An implicit-explicit hybrid solver for a system of stiff kinetic equations. J. Comput. Phys. 1994, 115, 515-523.
11. Chock, O.P.; Dunker, A. M. A comparison of numerical methods for solving the advection equation. Atmos. Environ. 1983, 17, 11-24.
12. (123 Chock, D. P. A comparison of numerical methods for solving the advection equation-II. Atmos. Environ. 1985, 19, 571-586.
13. Donea J. A Taylor-Galerkin method for convective Iransport problems. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 1984, 20, 101-119.
14. Gazdag J. Numerical convective schemes based on accurate computation of space derivatives. J. Comput. Phys. 1973, 13, 100-113.
15. Forester K. C. Higher order monotonic convective difference schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 1977, 23, 1-22.
16. Zalesak S. T. Fully multidimensional flux-corrected transport algorithms for fluids. J. Comput. Phys. 1979, 31, 335-362.
17. Bott, A. Monotone flux limitation in the area-preserving fluxform advection algorithm. Mon. Weather Rev. 1992, 120, 2592-2602.
18. Bott, A. The monotone area-preserving flux-form advection algorithm: reducing the time-splitting error in two-dimensional flow fields. Mon. Weather Rev. 1993, 121, 2637-2641.
19. Yarwood, G., Systems Applications International, San Rafael, CA, personal communication, 1993.
20. U.S. EPA. User's Guide for the Urban Airshed Model, Volume II: User's Manual for UAM (CB-IV) Modeling System: EPA-450/4-90-007A. U.S. EPA: Research Triangle Park," NC, June 1990.
21. Dabdub, D., Seinfeld, J. H. Numerical Advective schemes used in air quality models-sequential and parallel implementation. Atmos. Environ. 1994, 28, 3369-3385.