Detection of first-order structure in optic flow fields

Vision Research

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 259-270

  Te Pas, Susan F ^a   Kappers, Astrid M L ^a   Koenderink, Jan J ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Detection; Looming; Motion; Optic flow; Psychophysics

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; MOTION; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL THRESHOLD;

HUMAN; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; ROTATION; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0029656136     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00084-D     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. De Bruyn, B. & Orban, G. A. (1990). The role of direction information in the perception of geometric optic flow components. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 433-438.
2. De Bruyn, B. & Orban, G. A. (1993). Segregation of spatially superimposed optic flow components. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19(5), 1014-1027.
3. Freeman, T. C. A. & Harris, M. G. (1992). Human sensitivity to expanding and rotating motion: effects of complementary masking and directional structure. Vision Research, 32(1), 81-87.
4. Gibson, J. J. (1950). The perception of the visual world. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
5. Glass, L. & Pérez, R. (1973). Perception of random dot interference patterns. Nature, 246(5432), 360-362.
6. Graziano, M. S. A., Andersen, R. A. & Snowden, R. J. (1994). Tuning of MST neurons to spiral motions. Journal of Neuroscience, 14(1), 54-67.
7. Kappers, A. M. L., te Pas, S. F. & Koenderink, J. J. (1993). Detection of divergence in optic-flow fields. Perception, 22 (Suppl.), 83a.
8. Kappers, A. M. L., van Doorn, A. J. & Koenderink, J. J. (1994). Detection of vorticity in optical flow fields. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 11(1), 48-54.
9. Koenderink, J. J. (1986). Optic flow. Vision Research, 26(1), 161-180.
10. Koenderink, J. J. & van Doorn, A. J. (1975). Invariant properties of the motion parallax field due to the movement of rigid bodies relative to an observer. Optica Acta, 22, 773-791.
11. Koenderink, J. J. & van Doorn, A. J. (1976). Local structure of movement parallax of the plane. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 66(7), 717-723.
12. Lappin, J. S., Norman, J. F. & Mowafy, L. (1991). The detectability of geometric structure in rapidly changing optical patterns. Perception, 20, 513-528.
13. Longuet-Higgins, H. C. & Pradzny K. (1980). The interpretation of a moving retinal image. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 208, 385-387.
14. Milne, A. B. & Snowden, R. J. (1993). Is there anything special about expansion and rotational flow fields? Perception, 22 (Suppl.), 95a.
15. Orban, G. A., Lagae, L., Verri, A., Raiguel, S., Xiao, D., Maes, H. & Torre, V. (1992). First-order analysis of optical flow in monkey brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A., 89, 2595-2599.
16. Regan, D. & Beverly, K. I. (1985). Visual responses to vorticity and the neural analysis of optic flow. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 2(2), 280-283.
17. Sekuler, A. B. (1992). Simple-pooling of unidirectional motion predicts speed discrimination for looming stimuli. Vision Research, 32 (12), 2277-2288.
18. Tanaka, K. & Saito, H.-A. (1989). Analysis of motion of the visual field by direction, expansion/contraction, and rotation cells clustered in the dorsal part of the medial superior temporal area of the macaque monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 62-3, 626-641.
19. Tanaka, K., Fukada, Y. & Saito, H.-A. (1989). Underlying mechanisms of the response specificity of expansion/contraction, and rotation cells in the dorsal part of the medial superior temporal area of the macaque monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 62-3, 642-656.
20. Warren, W. H., Blackwell, A. W., Kurtz, K. J., Hatsopoulos, N. G. & Kalish, M. L. (1991). On the sufficiency of the velocity field for perception of heading. Biological Cybernetics, 65, 311-320.