A national survey of the arrangements managed-care plans make with physicians

New England Journal of Medicine

Volumn 333, Issue 25, 1995, Pages 1678-1683

  Gold, Marsha R ^a   Hurley, Robert ^a   Lake, Timothy ^a   Ensor, Todd ^a   Berenson, Robert ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; GROUP PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATION; MEDICAL FEE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNITED STATES;

CAPITATION FEE; DATA COLLECTION; HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATIONS; INDEPENDENT PRACTICE ASSOCIATIONS; MANAGED CARE PROGRAMS; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PHYSICIANS; PREFERRED PROVIDER ORGANIZATIONS; SALARIES AND FRINGE BENEFITS; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

EID: 0029561122     PISSN: 00284793     EISSN: 15334406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199512213332505     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Weiner JP, de Lissovoy G Razing a tower of Babel: a taxonomy for managed care and health insurance plans. J Health Polit Policy Law 1993; 18: 75-103
2. Gabel J, Liston D, Jensen G, Marsteller J The health insurance picture in 1993: some rare good news. Health Aff (Millwood) 1994; 13: 327-336
3. Berenson RA A physician's view of managed care. Health Aff (Millwood) 1991; 10: 106-119
4. Hillman AL Managing the physician: rules versus incentives. Health Aff (Millwood) 1991; 10: 138-146
5. Hillman AL Financial incentives for physicians in HMOs: is there a conflict of interest? N Engl J Med 1987; 317: 1743-1748
6. Luft HS. Health maintenance organizations: dimensions of performance. New York: John Wiley, 1981.
7. Miller RH, Luft HS Managed care plan performance since 1980: a literature analysis. JAMA 1994; 271: 1512-1519
8. Gold M, Nelson L, Lake T, Behind the curve: a critical assessment of how little is known about the managed care arrangements with physicians. Med Care Res Rev 1995; 2: 307-341
9. Freeborn DK, Pope CR. Promise and performance in managed care: the prepaid group practice model. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994.
10. The effects of managed care and managed competition. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Budget Office, 1995.
11. Effects of managed care: an update. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Budget Office, 1994.
12. Annual report to congress. Washington, D.C.: Physician Payment Review Commission, 1995.
13. Gold M, Hurley R, Lake T, et al. Arrangements between managed care plans and physicians. Selected external research series no. 3. Washington, D.C.: Physician Payment Review Commission, 1995.
14. National Directory of HMOs. Washington, D.C.: Group Health Association of America, 1994.
15. Blalock HM. Social statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1979.
16. Report card pilot project, technical report. Washington, D.C.: National Committee for Quality Assurance, 1995.
17. Standards for the accreditation of managed care organizations. 1993 ed. Washington, D.C.: National Committee for Quality Assurance, 1992.