Results with mechanical cardiac valvular prostheses

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Volumn 60, Issue 6, 1995, Pages 1836-1844

  Akins, Cary W ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BLOOD CLOTTING; HEART SURGERY; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; THROMBOEMBOLISM; THROMBOGENESIS;

HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN;

EID: 0029552024     PISSN: 00034975     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0003-4975(95)00766-0     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. Mechanical cardiac valvular prostheses
2. Noninvasive in vivo and in vitro study of the St Jude mitral valve prosthesis
3. Clinical and echocardiographic evaluation of the St. Jude cardiac valve prosthesis: follow-up of 126 patients
4. Clinical and hemodynamic assessment of the Omniscience prosthetic heart valve
5. Clinical evaluation of the Omniscience aortic disc valve prosthesis
6. Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations
7. Eight years' experience with the Medtronic-Hall valve prosthesis
8. Clinical experience with the Medtronic-Hall valve prosthesis
9. Mitral valve replacement: randomized trial of St. Jude and Medtronic-Hall prostheses
10. Five-year experience with the Medtronic Hall prosthesis in isolated aortic valve replacement
11. The Monostrut versus Medtronic Hall prosthesis: a prospective randomized study
12. Heart valve replacement with St. Jude Medical valve prosthesis: long-term experience in 743 patients in Switzerland
13. St. Jude prosthesis for aortic and mitral valve replacement: a ten-year experience
14. Thromboembolic risk and late survival after mitral valve replacement with the St. Jude Medical valve
15. The St. Jude Medical valve: experience with 1000 cases
16. Lower intensity anticoagulation therapy results in lower complication rates with the St. Jude Medical prosthesis
17. Twelve years' experience with the St. Jude Medical valve prosthesis
18. Long-term results of valve replacement with the St. Jude Medical valve
19. The St. Jude Medical prosthesis: a thirteen-year experience
20. Early and late-phase events after valve replacement with the St. Jude Medical prosthesis in 1200 patients
21. Clinical evaluation of the Omniscience cardiac valve prosthesis: follow-up of up to 6 years
22. An international experience with the CarboMedics prosthetic heart valve
23. The clinical report
24. Performance characteristics of the Starr-Edwards model 1260 aortic valve prosthesis beyond ten years
25. Comparative evaluation of aortic valve replacement with Starr, Björk, and porcine valve prostheses
26. Ten year clinical evaluation of Starr-Edwards 2400 and 1260 aortic valve prostheses
27. Long-term results of valve replacement with the Starr-Edwards silicone ball prostheses
28. Ten-year follow-up of the Starr-Edwards prosthesis
29. Aortic valve replacement with the Starr-Edwards prosthesis: a comparison of the first and second decades of follow-up
30. Long-term performance of the Starr-Edwards Silastic ball valves and St Jude Medical bi-leaftlet valves
31. Medtronic-Hall prosthesis: valve related deaths and complications
32. Ten-year experience with the Medtronic Hall valvular prosthesis
33. Medtronic Hall valve replacement in a third-world population group
34. Clinical comparison of St. Jude and porcine aortic valve prostheses
35. St. Jude Medical prosthesis: valve-related deaths and complications
36. Hematological complications with the St. Jude valve and reduced-dose Coumadin
37. Durability and low thrombogenicity of the St. Jude Medical valve at 5-year follow-up
38. St. Jude Medical valve replacement
39. Results and complications with the Omniscience prosthesis
40. Ten to fifteen year reassessment of the performance characteristics of the Starr-Edwards model 6120 mitral valve prosthesis
41. Twenty years' experience with the model 6120 Starr-Edwards valve in the mitral position
42. Comparative clinical results with the Omniscience (STM1), Medtronic-Hall and Björk-Shiley convexo-concave (70°) prostheses in mitral valve replacement
43. Clinical comparison of St. Jude and porcine mitral valve prostheses