Phylogenetic analysis of ontogenetic shape transformations: A reassessment of the piranha genus pygocentrus (teleostei)

Systematic Biology

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 1995, Pages 343-360

  Fink, William L ^a   Zelditch, Miriam Leah ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Character independence; Geometric morphometrics; Ontogeny; Phylogeny; Piranhas; Pygocentrus

Indexed keywords

EID: 0029534847     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: 1076836X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/44.3.343     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Alberch, P., and J. Alberch. 1981. Heterochronic mechanisms of morphological diversification and evolutionary change in the neotropical salamander Bolitoglossa occidentalis (Amphibia: Plethodontidae). J. Morphol. 167:249-264.
2. Alberch, P., S. J. Gould, G. F. Oster, and D. B. Wake. 1979. Size and shape in ontogeny and phylogeny. Paleobiology 5:296-317.
3. Bookstein, F. L. 1986. Size and shape spaces for landmark data in two dimensions. Stat. Sci. 1:181-242.
4. Bookstein, F. L. 1989. Principal warps: Thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. USA 11:567-585.
5. Bookstein, F. L. 1991. Morphometric tools for landmark data: Geometry and biology. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York.
6. Bookstein, F. L. 1994. Can biometrical shape be a homologous character? Pages 197-226 in Homology: The hierarchical basis of comparative biology (B. K. Hall, ed.). Academic Press, New York.
7. Bookstein, F. L., B. Chernoff, R. L. Elder, J. Humphries, Jr., G. R. Smith, and R. E. Strauss. 1985. Morphometries in evolutionary biology. Spec. Publ. Acad. Nat. Sd. Phila. 15:i-xvii, 1-277.
8. Creighton, G. K., and R. E. Strauss. 1986. Comparative patterns of growth and development in cri-cetine rodents and the evolution of ontogeny. Evolution 40:94-106.
9. Danser, B. H. 1950. A theory of systematics. Bibl. Biotheor. 4:117-180.
10. DE Queiroz, K. 1985. The ontogenetic method for determining character polarity and its relevance to phylogenetic systematics. Syst. Zool. 34:280-299.
11. Fink, W. L. 1981. Ontogeny and phylogeny of tooth attachment modes in actinopterygian fishes. J. Morphol. 167:167-184.
12. Fink, W. L. 1993. Revision of the piranha genus Py-gocentrus (Teleostei, Charadformes). Copeia 1993: 665-687.
13. Gould, S. J. 1977. Ontogeny and phylogeny. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
14. Hall, B. K. 1992. Evolutionary developmental biology. Chapman & Hall, New York.
15. Jensen, R. J. 1993. The 25th International Numerical Taxonomy Conference. Syst. Biol. 42:599-601.
16. Klompen, J. S. H., and B. M. OConnor. 1989. Ontogenetic patterns and phylogenetic analysis in Acari. Pages 91-103 in The concept of stase and the ontogeny of arthropods (H. M. Andre and J.-C. Lions, eds.). AGAR, Wavre, Belgium.
17. Kluge, A. G., and R. E. Strauss. 1985. Ontogeny and systematics. Artnu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16:247-268.
18. Mabee, P. 1993. Phylogenetic interpretation of ontogenetic change: Sorting out the actual and artefac-tual in an empirical case study of centrarchid fishes. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 107:175-291.
19. Machado-Allison, A. 1985. Studies on the subfamily Serrasalminae. Part III. On the generic status and phylogenetic relationships of the genera Pygopristis, Pygocentrus, Pristobrycon, and Serrasalmus (Teleostei-Charaddae-Serrasalminae). Acta Biol. Venez. 12(1):19-42.
20. Maddison, W. P., and D. R. Maddison. 1992. MacClade, analysis of phylogeny and character evolution, version 3. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
21. Mc Kinney, M. 1988. Heterochrony in evolution. Plenum, New York.
22. Moser, H. G., W. J. Richards, D. M. Cohen, M. P. Fahay, A. W. Kendall, and S. L. Richardson. 1984. Ontogeny and systematics of fishes. Am. Soc. Ichthyol. Herpetol. Spec. Publ. 1:i-ix, 1-760.
23. O'Grady, R. 1985. Ontogenetic sequences and the phylogenetics of parasitic flatworm life cycles. Cla-distics 1:159-170.
24. Patterson, C. 1982. Morphological characters and homology. Pages 21-74 in Problems of phylogenetic reconstruction (K. A. Joysey and A. E. Friday, eds.). Academic Press, London.
25. Rice, W. R. 1986. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223-225.
26. Richtsmeier, J. T., B. D. Corner, H. M. Grausz, J. M. Cheverud, and S. E. Danahey. 1993. The role of postnatal growth pattern in the production of facial morphology. Syst. Biol. 42:307-330.
27. Rohlf, F. J., and F. L. Bookstein (eds.). 1990. Proceedings of the Michigan morphometries workshop. Univ. Mich. Mus. Zool. Spec. Publ. 2:i-viii, 1-380.
28. Rohlf, F. J., and L. F. Marcus. 1993. A revolution in morphometries. Trends Ecol. Evol. 8:129-132.
29. Strauss, R. E. 1987. On allometry and relative growth in evolutionary studies. Syst. Zool. 36:7275.
30. Strauss, R. E., and L. A. Fuiman. 1985. Quantitative comparisons of body form and allometry in larval and adult Padfic sculpins (Teleostei: Cottidae). Can. J. Zool. 63:1582-1589.
31. Swiderski, D. L. 1994. Morphological evolution of the scapula in tree squirrels, chipmunks and ground squirrels (Sduridae): An analysis using thin-plate splines. Evolution 47:1854-1873.
32. Swofford, D. L. 1993. PAUP: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 3.1. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign.
33. Wake, D. B. 1989. Phylogenetic implications of ontogenetic data. Geobios 12:369-378.
34. Zelditch, M. L., F. L. Bookstein, and B. L. Lundri-Gan. 1992. Ontogeny of integrated skull growth in the cotton rat Sigmodon fulviventer. Evolution 46: 1164-1180.
35. Zelditch, M. L., W. L. Fink, and D. L. Swiderski. 1995. Morphometries, homology, and phylogenetics: Quantified characters as synapomorphies. Syst. Biol.44:179-189.