Commuting in transit versus automobile neighborhoods

Journal of the American Planning Association

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 1995, Pages 210-225

  Cervero, Robert ^a   Gorham, Roger ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOBILE NEIGHBOURHOOD; COMMUTING CHARACTERISTICS; COMPARATIVE STUDIES; SUBURBAN PLANNING; TRANSPORT PLANNING; URBAN DESIGN;

USA, CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO BAY;

EID: 0029520980     PISSN: 01944363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01944369508975634     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Beimborn, Edward, Harvey Rabinowitz, Peter Gugliotta, Charles Mrotek, and Shuming Yan. 1991. Guidelines for Transit Sensitive Land Use Design. Washington, DC: Urban Mass Transportation Administration.
2. Calthorpe, Peter. 1993. The Next American Metropolis. Princeton: Princeton Architectural Press.
3. Cervero, Robert. 1986. Suburban Gridlock. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research.
4. Cervero, Robert. 1989. America’s Suburban Centers: The Land Use-Transportation Link. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
5. Cervero, Robert. 1993. Transit-Supportive Development in the United States: Experiences and Prospects. Washington, DC: Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation.
6. Demoro, Harre. 1985. The Key Route: Transbay Commuting by Train and Ferry. Glendale, CA: Interurban Press.
7. Ewing, Reid, Padma Haliyur, and G. William Page. 1993. Getting Around a Traditional City, a Suburban PUD and Everything In-Between. In Alternative Transportation: Planning, Design, Issues, Solutions: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Pedestrian Conference. Boulder, CO: Go Boulder, City of Boulder, 21-30.
8. Fehrs and Peers Associates. 1992. Metropolitan Transportation Commission Bay Area Trip Rate Survey Analysis. Oakland, CA: Metropolitan Transportation Commission.
9. Fishman, Robert. 1987. Bourgeois Utopias: The Rise and Fall of Suburbia. New York: Basic Books.
10. Fogelson, Robert. 1967. The Fragmented Metropolis: Los Angeles 1850-1930. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
11. Handy, Susan. 1992. Regional Versus Local Accessibility: Neotraditional Development and its Implications for Non-work Travel. Built Environment 18, 4: 253-67.
12. Holtzclaw, John. 1990. Manhattanization versus Sprawl: How Density Impacts Auto Use: Comparing Five Bay Area Communities. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Pedestrian Conference. City of Boulder, 99-106.
13. Holtzclaw, John. 1994. Using Residential Patterns and Transit to Decrease Auto Dependence and Costs. San Francisco: National Resources Defense Council, unpublished paper.
14. Jackson, Kenneth. 1985. Crabgrass Frontier: The Suburbaniution of the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.
15. Kanafani, Adib. 1983. Transportation Demand Analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.
16. Katz, Peter. 1993. The New Urbanism: Toward an Architecture of Community. New York: McGraw-Hill.
17. Kulash, Walter, Joe Anglin, and David Marks. 1990. Traditional Neighborhood Development- Will the Trafic Work? Washington, DC: Real Estate Research Consultants.
18. LUTRAQ. 1992. The LUTRAQ Alternative/Analysis of Alternatives. Portland, OR: LUTRAQ, with Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Calthorpe Associates, and Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglas, Inc.
19. McNally, Michael, and Sherry Ryan. 1993. A Comparative Assessment of Travel: Characteristics of Neotraditional Developments. Irvine, CA: Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California.
20. Meyer, John, and Jose Gomez-Ibaiiez. 1981. Autos, Transit, and Cities. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
21. Maryland National Capital Park and Planning Commission (MNCPPC). 1992. Transit and Pedestrian Oriented Neighborhoods. Silver Spring: Maryland National Capital Park and Planning Commission.
22. Middlesex Somerset Mercer Regional Council (MSM). 1992. The Impact of Various Land Use Strategies on Suburban Mobility. Washington, DC: Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation.
23. Rabinowitz, Harvey, Edward Bemborn, Charles Mrotek, Shuming Yan, and Peter Gugliotta. 1991. The New Suburb: Analysis and Trends. Washington, DC: Urban Mass Transportation Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation.
24. Solomon, Daniel. 1992. ReBuilding. Princeton: Princeton Architectural Press.
25. Stone, J., and C. Johnson. 1992. Neotraditional Neighborhoods: A Solution to Traffic Congestion? In Site Impact Trafic Assessment Conference Proceedings, edited by E. Paaswell. New York: American Society of Civil Engineers.
26. Thomson, Michael. 1977. Great Cities and Their Trafic. London: Penguin.
27. White Mountain Survey Company. 1991. City of Portsmouth Trafic/Trip Generation Study. Ossippee, New Hampshire: White Mountain Survey Company.