Compliance after 17 Years of Breast Cancer Screening

Journal of Medical Screening

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 1995, Pages 195-199

  Scaf Klomp, W ^a   Van Sonderen, F L P ^a   Stewart, R ^a   Van Dijck, J A A M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

breast cancer; compliance; mammography

Indexed keywords

AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; COHORT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MARRIAGE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; RADIOGRAPHY; TIME;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COHORT STUDIES; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MAMMOGRAPHY; MARITAL STATUS; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0029446123     PISSN: 09691413     EISSN: 14755793     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/096914139500200405     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Shapiro S. The status of breast cancer screening: A quarter of a century of research. World J., Surg 1989; 13: 9–18.
2. Tabar L., Fagerberg G., Duffy S.W., Day N.E. The Swedish two country trial of mammographic screening for breast cancer: Recent results and calculation of benefit. J Epidemiol Community Health 1989; 43: 107–144.
3. Miller A.B. The costs and benefits of breast cancer screening. AmJ Prev Med 1993; 9: 175–180.
4. Roberts M.M., Alexander F.E., Anderson T.J., et al Edinburgh trial of screening for breast cancer: Mortality at seven years. Lancet 1990; 335: 241–246.
5. Collette HJA Rombach J.J. De Waard F, Collette C. An update of the DOM project for the early detection of breast cancer. In: Day N.E., Miller AB, eds. Screening for breast cancer. Toronto: Hans Huber, 1988.
6. Peeters P.H.M. Verbeek A.L.M. Hendriks J.H.C.L. van Bon M.J.H. Screening for breast cancer in Nijmegen. Report of 6 screening rounds, 1975–1986. Int J., Cancer 1989; 43: 221–230.
7. Vernon S.W., Laville E.A., Jackson G.L. Participation in breast screening programs: A review. Soc Sci Med 1990; 30: 1107–1118.
8. Fink R., Shapiro S. Significance of increased efforts to gain participation in screening for breast cancer. Am J., Prev Med 1990; 6: 31–34.
9. Breen N., Kessler L. Changes in the use of screening mammography: Evidence from the 1987 and 1990 national health interview surveys. Am J., Public Health 1994; 84: 62–67.
10. Lerman C., Trock B., Rimer K., Boyce A., Jepson Ch, Engstrom P. Psychological and behavioral implications of abnormal mammograms. Ann Intern Med 1991; 114: 657–661.
11. De Koning H.J., Van Ineveld B.M., Van Ootmarssen G.J., et al Breast cancer screening and cost-effectiveness; policy alternatives, quality of life consideration and the possible impact of uncertain factors. Int J., Cancer 1991; 49: 531–537.
12. Scaf-Klomp W., Bosveld HEP Van Sonderen FLP Van den Heuvel WJA. Compliance after 15 years of repeated breast cancer screening [abstr]. 7th Conference of the European Health Psychology Society (EHPS). Brussels, September 1993.