|
Volumn 86, Issue 6, 1995, Pages 960-963
|
Drainage following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy: Dogma or need?
a a a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
AGED;
ARTICLE;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
CYSTIC LYMPHANGIOMA;
ECHOGRAPHY;
ENDOMETRIUM CANCER;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
INCIDENCE;
LYMPH NODE DISSECTION;
LYMPH NODE METASTASIS;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
PELVIS LYMPH NODE;
PELVIS LYMPHADENECTOMY;
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
SUCTION DRAINAGE;
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;
UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;
UTERUS CANCER;
ADULT;
DRAINAGE;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
HYSTERECTOMY;
INCIDENCE;
LYMPH NODE EXCISION;
MIDDLE AGED;
PELVIS;
POSTOPERATIVE CARE;
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS;
PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
|
EID: 0029431180
PISSN: 00297844
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00311-E Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (66)
|
References (10)
|