|
Volumn 10, Issue 1, 1995, Pages 95-151
|
The health care proxy and the narrative of death.
a
a
NONE
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL;
ARTICLE;
ATTITUDE;
ATTITUDE TO DEATH;
ATTITUDE TO HEALTH;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
DEATH;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
EMPIRICAL APPROACH;
EVALUATION;
FREEDOM;
GOVERNMENT;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HEALTH CARE PROXY LAW 1990 (NY);
HISTORY;
HOSPITAL;
HUMAN;
INFORMATION PROCESSING;
INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LIVING WILL;
LONG TERM CARE;
MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY;
MEDICINE;
PASSIVE EUTHANASIA;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
PHYSICIAN;
RIGHT TO DIE;
SOCIAL CONTROL;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
UNITED STATES;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
EMPIRICAL APPROACH;
HEALTH CARE PROXY LAW 1990 (NY);
LEGAL APPROACH;
ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL;
ADVANCE DIRECTIVES;
ATTITUDE;
ATTITUDE TO DEATH;
BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
COMMUNICATION;
DATA COLLECTION;
DEATH;
EUTHANASIA, PASSIVE;
EVALUATION STUDIES;
FREEDOM;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE;
HISTORY;
HOSPITALS;
HUMANS;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LIFE SUPPORT CARE;
LIVING WILLS;
MEDICINE;
NEW YORK;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
PHYSICIANS;
RIGHT TO DIE;
SOCIAL CONTROL, FORMAL;
STATE GOVERNMENT;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
UNITED STATES;
|
EID: 0029418105
PISSN: 10446419
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (2)
|
References (0)
|