|
|
|
Volumn 22, Issue 3, 1995, Pages 933-979
|
|
Death of an unborn child: jurisprudential inconsistencies in wrongful death, criminal homicide, and abortion cases.
a
a
NONE
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
BEGINNING OF HUMAN LIFE;
CRIMINAL LAW;
FETAL WELL BEING;
FETUS;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
GOVERNMENT;
HOMICIDE;
HUMAN;
INDIVIDUALITY;
INDUCED ABORTION;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL LIABILITY;
LIFE;
MALPRACTICE;
NEWBORN;
PERSONHOOD;
PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT;
PRENATAL EXPOSURE;
UNITED STATES;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
LEGAL APPROACH;
ABORTION, INDUCED;
BEGINNING OF HUMAN LIFE;
CRIMINAL LAW;
EMBRYONIC AND FETAL DEVELOPMENT;
FETAL VIABILITY;
FETUS;
HOMICIDE;
HUMANS;
INDIVIDUALITY;
INFANT, NEWBORN;
JUDICIAL ROLE;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LIABILITY, LEGAL;
LIFE;
MALPRACTICE;
PERSONHOOD;
PRENATAL EXPOSURE DELAYED EFFECTS;
STATE GOVERNMENT;
SUPREME COURT DECISIONS;
UNITED STATES;
|
|
EID: 0029417837
PISSN: 0092430X
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (6)
|
|
References (0)
|
