|
Volumn 37, Issue 4, 1995, Pages 1183-1207
|
The other right-to-life debate: when does Fourteenth Amendment "life" end?
a
a
NONE
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
BIOETHICS;
BRAIN DEATH;
BRAIN DISEASE;
BRAIN INJURY;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
DEATH;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
ETHICS;
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT;
FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT;
GOVERNMENT;
HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION;
HUMAN;
INDIVIDUALITY;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LONG TERM CARE;
MISCELLANEOUS NAMED GROUPS;
NUTRITIONAL SUPPORT;
PASSIVE EUTHANASIA;
PERSISTENT VEGETATIVE STATE;
PERSONHOOD;
PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION;
POLICY;
RESOURCE ALLOCATION;
SELF CONCEPT;
SOCIOECONOMICS;
TREATMENT WITHDRAWAL;
UNITED STATES;
VULNERABLE POPULATION;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT;
LEGAL APPROACH;
BIOETHICAL ISSUES;
BIOETHICS;
BRAIN DEATH;
BRAIN DISEASES;
BRAIN INJURIES;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
COERCION;
DEATH;
ETHICS;
EUTHANASIA, PASSIVE;
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT;
FINANCING, GOVERNMENT;
GOVERNMENT;
HEALTH CARE RATIONING;
HUMANS;
INDIVIDUALITY;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LIFE SUPPORT CARE;
NUTRITIONAL SUPPORT;
PERSISTENT VEGETATIVE STATE;
PERSONHOOD;
PERSONS;
PUBLIC POLICY;
RESOURCE ALLOCATION;
SELF CONCEPT;
STATE GOVERNMENT;
SUPREME COURT DECISIONS;
UNITED STATES;
VALUE OF LIFE;
VULNERABLE POPULATIONS;
WEDGE ARGUMENT;
WITHHOLDING TREATMENT;
|
EID: 0029417592
PISSN: 0004153X
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (2)
|
References (0)
|